rosnik Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 (edited) I received this morning from PreciousTime. Here some pictures for you guys. Edited October 16, 2007 by rosnik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 So thats all the info we get hey? lol The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago. Is this Asian or Valjoux? This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6 LOnnie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdick Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 (edited) So thats all the info we get hey? lol The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago. Is this Asian or Valjoux? This one is prob 100x more reliable than the new "time bomb" sec @6 LOnnie I think it is a non-chrono asian automatic. Edited September 24, 2007 by slickdick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gioarmani Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Does the large second hand (stop-watch hand) always turn too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted September 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Sorry for the poor infos, now I'll get for you:rolleyes: The Chrono is foull functional, the seconds are @9 , The little dials are @3 and @9, aligned. About the movements I think it's A7750 but I do not know exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdick Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Sorry for the poor infos, now I'll get for you:rolleyes: The Chrono is foull functional, the seconds are @9 , The little dials are @3 and @9, aligned. About the movements I think it's A7750 but I do not know exactly. It does looko like asain 7750, its the first pre-200x one i see with markers next to the subsdials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted September 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 It does looko like asain 7750, its the first pre-200x one i see with markers next to the subsdials. Yes, it's 16520 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted September 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Do you think the bracelet is correct? I'm thinking to get one folding first link type............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rckh Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Sorry; Let hope u paid not more than USD$50 for this Daytona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosnik Posted September 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 (edited) It's really so bud? Edited September 24, 2007 by rosnik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giorgio Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 Sorry; Let hope u paid not more than USD$50 for this Daytona. Please tell us where you get 7750 chronographs for less than $50. I'm sure we'd all love to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giorgio Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 The sub dial spacing doesnt look to bad. Some of those old "Swiss" daytonas were just rediculous years ago. I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart. All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 Now that i see the new batch of pics, you can really see the sub dial spacing... pretty far apart Lonnie I think the subdial spacing is the same as those old ones you refer to. Looks like they made the subdials smaller and the rings thicker so they could fit the markers in at 3 and 6. This also helps to make it look like they're closer together than they actually are, but they're still too far apart. All in all, not a bad watch though, and you don't have to worry about a hacked movement grinding to a halt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfreeman420 Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 If this is trying to be a zenith based daytona the hour markers are too fat and short. Should be long and skinny. The subdials are way off. I couldn't wear that, although I do have two second @ six paperweights right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now