Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

580 or 585 endlinks what fits better for mbk / mbw 1665 and 1680 ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

howdy !

a rolex concessionaire said there are differences.

little differences but differences.

i can get both but which are the better solution,

which fits better for the

mbk / mbw seadweller 1665 and the submariner 1680?

greetings

316L

Posted

The 580's were original to both the 1680, and the 1665. The 585 was later developed to have a better fit on the thicker Seadweller case, and became standard on the 1665.

Posted (edited)

but which fits better for the mbk / mbw 1665 and 1680 "CASE" ? ;)

the 580 or the 585?

as possible without wobble and gap :rolleyes:

Edited by 316L
Posted

Since MBW cases are 1:1 (for the most part), please see my earlier post.

Guest kotaro
Posted

avitt, 93150 - 580 bracelet & end piece is correct for 16610 noobmariner?

Posted

Early submariner 16610's had the 93150 band with 501B end pieces. Around 2000 or so, the 92350 band with SEL's came out. SEL means solid end links which are part of the band itself and not separate like the old style. Noob has the 93250 since it is recent- 2006.

Posted

YES very important and an easy mod

Don't forget to drill the case for genuine springbars ...
Posted

yes of course.

i will use a drill of 1,2mm for the lugholes.

and which size are the correct for the little countersink, 1,4 or 1,5mm...?

Posted
YES very important and an easy mod

why is this so important? How genuine springbars improve the watch?

Please explain.

Posted

The springbars & springbar holes (in the side of the lugs) of rep watches are usually smaller than their gen counterparts. The difference in springbar holes makes it relatively easy to spot a rep Sub or Seadweller from several feet away. If you enlarge the holes and replace the narrow rep springbars with gens (or properly sized aftermarket springbars), your rep will be one step closer to looking like a gen.

Posted

i will use a drill of 1,2mm for the lugholes.

but which size are the correct to chamfering the 1665 and 1680 lugholes?

Posted

Some people like to countersink lug holes (which is what I think you mean by 'chamfer'), but I do not think this is correct & have never done that on any of my watches. Just drill & buff, that is all

Image52.jpg

dw_lugholes.jpg

springbar_comparison.jpg

5514ComexwithmoddedHevalve.jpg

Posted

i think you're right.

chamfering/countersink e.g. with a 6mm driller to make it closer to be a gen,

is an optical illusion.

lugholesnj6.jpg

Posted

To become the gen look you must shape the lugs down a bit on both sides...

The lugs on the rep case are slighty bigger than on gen ones...

Countersink the caseholes is totally wrong,drill them and polish it.

Thats it ;)

But for the question...

585 Endlinks for the 1665

580 Endlinks for the 1680

But 380 Endlinks match the 1680 case perfect...

Posted

thanks a lot tribal.

But 380 Endlinks match the 1680 case perfect...

very interesting...

i know the 380b are for the tudor submariner.

explain us what makes it perfect for the 1680 case, please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up