r11co Posted January 24, 2008 Report Share Posted January 24, 2008 For those of you not following my 'Bond 22' thread in the Omega section.... New Bond Film Title Confirmed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coeuss Posted January 24, 2008 Report Share Posted January 24, 2008 For those of you not following my 'Bond 22' thread in the Omega section.... New Bond Film Title Confirmed Just in time for our friends in Guangzhou to produce a near perfect PO. I need a new one since my old one is broken. I would like to see one with correct symbol, correct markers, correct bezel. It's not too much to ask is it. If I were to Franken Omega one it would cost over 600 bucks at that point I might as well save my money and buy a real one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted January 26, 2008 Report Share Posted January 26, 2008 They might as well have called it "James Bond and the Temple of Doom" or "James Bond: The Phantom Menace". Not the best title choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadweller4000 Posted January 26, 2008 Report Share Posted January 26, 2008 They might as well have called it "James Bond and the Temple of Doom" or "James Bond: The Phantom Menace". Not the best title choice. Who cares, as long as it rocks like Bond 21? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b16a2 Posted January 26, 2008 Report Share Posted January 26, 2008 Im such an avid Bond fan, I can't wait for the release of this one! Title for me is irrelevant, I know it's going to be brilliant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted January 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 Title for me is irrelevant... Agreed, although (like DC) it has grown on me. With this being the 40th Anniversary of Fleming's death there had to be a literary link in the title. It would have been disrespectful not to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
confused69u Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 I can't wait for this one either but Batman #2 will definitely trump this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonSlayer Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 It sounds a bit like a title of a Indiana Jones movie Come on guys! It's not that bad, surely Octopussy has to take the biscuit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 This was on the MSN Homepage. Copy and pasted for your reading pleasure ( I haven't actually read it through myself yet ) Daniel Craig: MSN Interview Daniel Craig is two weeks into the shoot of Quantum Of Solace when we meet him on set at Pinewood Studios. He Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Why dont they just call it Bond22? These titles are getting rediculous haha. I hope one day they go back to Rolex becasue i really dont like Omegas anymore lol. The last bond film as borderline ok... needs WAY more gadgets and cars though. The last film really didnt have that "007" feeling. dizz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Why dont they just call it Bond22? These titles are getting rediculous haha. I hope one day they go back to Rolex becasue i really dont like Omegas anymore lol. The last bond film as borderline ok... needs WAY more gadgets and cars though. The last film really didnt have that "007" feeling. I agree on the title, even though in 6 months it will just be part of the background, much like any other title. However, on all other points, I could not disagree more. More gadgets? Last film didn't feel like 007? Is Crack free where you live? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Indeed, I liked the 'less gadgets' aspect of Casino Royale. Bond didn't really have 'gadgets' as such in the novels (certainly not as they were in the movies) I felt that aspect kept Casino Royale more true to the original spirit of Bond, not the corrupted version people recognize from the movies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 I agree on the title, even though in 6 months it will just be part of the background, much like any other title. However, on all other points, I could not disagree more. More gadgets? Last film didn't feel like 007? Is Crack free where you live? lol i just watched the movie again last week and honestly not one gadget stands out in my mind right now. Maybe it was all the free crak thats affecting my memory lol. We need less naked james bond and more cool gagets and stuff. Oh yeah and they need to go back to ROLEX and dump the omegas!!! haha Here comes the flames from the Omega guys!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 (edited) lol i just watched the movie again last week and honestly not one gadget stands out in my mind right now. Maybe it was all the free crak thats affecting my memory lol. We need less naked james bond and more cool gagets and stuff. Oh yeah and they need to go back to ROLEX and dump the omegas!!! haha Here comes the flames from the Omega guys!! The only gadget that I can think of, would be the defibrilator, and possible the real-time monitoring of Bond's vital signs. However, the technology exists for such a device, so I wouldn't like to say for sure that it could be considered a 'fantasy' gadget, as was the case with previous Bond movies. [Edit to add] As much as I prefer Omega as a brand to Rolex, indeed, going back to Bond's roots should include going back to a Rolex. That's what Fleming wrote, that's what he should have Edited January 29, 2008 by TeeJay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted February 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Teaser.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Teaser.... As the man said, I'm lovin' it Wonder how long before the McWags find a way of having Bond flogging their McBurgers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 The only gadget that I can think of, would be the defibrilator, and possible the real-time monitoring of Bond's vital signs. However, the technology exists for such a device, so I wouldn't like to say for sure that it could be considered a 'fantasy' gadget, as was the case with previous Bond movies. [Edit to add] As much as I prefer Omega as a brand to Rolex, indeed, going back to Bond's roots should include going back to a Rolex. That's what Fleming wrote, that's what he should have But unfortunatly Rolex wont Play, or pay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dario33 Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Poster: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 (edited) But unfortunatly Rolex wont Play, or pay. What they need, is for someone in the crew to pull the Rolley off their wrist Broccoli-style Edited February 8, 2008 by TeeJay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted February 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 Poster: Yup - saw that one already and proves the title was either embargoed or a last -minute thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marrickvilleboy Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 he's a little too rough looking - so wrinkly too. I liked Pierce Brosnan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
confused69u Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 he's a little too rough looking - so wrinkly too. I liked Pierce Brosnan. We get it, you like gentler men handling you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.