Watchout Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Hi all, Im offered to buy this watch for 350 euro's. Sorry for bad pics but it's what I'm provided with. PLs help me out Gen or ..? Type? THANKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b16a2 Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Looks like a genuine Chronomat to me. Ref - 13048. They were made in 1993 for a year. I would want better pictures before handing over the money though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozziebear Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Hi all, Im offered to buy this watch for 350 euro's. Sorry for bad pics but it's what I'm provided with. PLs help me out Gen or ..? Type? THANKS A very poor fake. And for that price you can find much better. I you are still not sure, post the pics on the Breitling Watchuseek forum; there is a special sub-forum about fakes. But don't mention this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozziebear Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Looks like a genuine Chronomat to me. Ref - 13048. They were made in 1993 for a year. I would want better pictures before handing over the money though. Hmm, doubting, but then it must be a Chronomat ref 13050 instead of a 13048. ( Dial is "Guilloch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 I'm always amazed how people possibly CAN take such technically god-awful pictures. I mean, how is it even possible? Must be years of practice behind it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRasta Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 If that's a gen, it's the fugliest gen I have ever seen. It looks like Canal St. crap to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrgod Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Fake fake fake... The rep seems to have running seconds@6, while the genuine chronomat of this version has a 7750, with seconds@9. I bet it has a quartz-movement. Also..you can just ask yourself why the seller will sell a genuine Chronomat to you for about half the normal market price..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceberg1127 Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 I was quick to all fak as well, but look at the date font in the first pic... it looks sorta gen to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andreww Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 The rep seems to have running seconds@6, while the genuine chronomat of this version has a 7750, with seconds@9. I bet it has a quartz-movement. Thats the first thing I noticed. Undoubtedly a fake, as I cannot recall Breitling using anything but a Cal 13 (7750) for watches with a 6-9-12 configuration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis123 Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Hi all, Im offered to buy this watch for 350 euro's. Sorry for bad pics but it's what I'm provided with. PLs help me out Gen or ..? Type? THANKS Everything is sooo wrong here: subdial arrangement wrong, lume wrong, band wrong, guilloch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CY0811 Posted August 12, 2008 Report Share Posted August 12, 2008 I wouldnt pay $20 for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tintin Posted August 12, 2008 Report Share Posted August 12, 2008 LoL! I mean, come on guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotoman Posted August 12, 2008 Report Share Posted August 12, 2008 crap crap crap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.