187 - Magazine Review

[docblackrock]

Thought THIS may be of interest to those of us that have, as well as those who will soon have (that covers just about everyone then )

Enjoy

[Bazz]

Nice link Doc, thanks.

[Watchmeister]

Thanks.

[KB]

Good read thanks Doc

Ken

[Chronus]

Nice one, but it seems less like a review and more of a paid for advert!

[docblackrock]

Nice one, but it seems less like a review and more of a paid for advert!

Good observation, I believe the term is 'advertorial'

[Dario33]

thanks for the link

[Chronus]

Nice pictures though

[Willith]

Nice one, but it seems less like a review and more of a paid for advert!

That's the same thing I was thinking and I also thought it was fairly poorly written (not that I'm great at it). It did have some really nice pictures and I'm sure the reviewer enjoyed his free watch.

I once bought a watch from a guy who used it to write a review for a magazine, it was a Ball Hydrocarbom GMT. He basically got it and had his company pay for it for him to write the review and then he turned around and sold it to me. I need to find a job like that.

[sevomd]

Is that the Eddie Lee version or the Watchonpo version???

Eddy

[Lollipop]

Nice one, but it seems less like a review and more of a paid for advert!

Umm what is there to review? It has a rather common 7753 so you're either buying it because of the styling, or perhaps the quality of the case, buckle and packaging.

[dadog13]

tnx for the link..nice read..

[AlexLeGrande]

Thanks to Panerai’s innovative use of luminous

materials—a mix of zinc sulphide and radium bromide, later

known as Radiomir—Panerai’s watches were perfectly legible

underwater.

I didn't know that!