faonmyea Posted July 9, 2006 Report Posted July 9, 2006 it makes it somewhat difficult to tell the accuracy. it makes me think they're trying to hide the flaws.
ubiquitous Posted July 9, 2006 Report Posted July 9, 2006 Perhaps it's to achieve a better image shot without glare or reflection?
faonmyea Posted July 9, 2006 Author Report Posted July 9, 2006 sometimes i think the date font. wouldn't it make sense to take at least one straight foward shot?
yt74 Posted July 9, 2006 Report Posted July 9, 2006 sometimes i think the date font. wouldn't it make sense to take at least one straight foward shot? I have often wondered that myself...
ubiquitous Posted July 9, 2006 Report Posted July 9, 2006 (edited) sometimes i think the date font. wouldn't it make sense to take at least one straight foward shot? Doubt it. Edited July 9, 2006 by ubiquitous
Pugwash Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 it makes it somewhat difficult to tell the accuracy. it makes me think they're trying to hide the flaws. Taking face-on shots is not straight-forward. Also, it makes the watch look flat and lifeless. Something to hide? If this were the case, every dealer review would mention it.
hk45ca Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Taking face-on shots is not straight-forward. Also, it makes the watch look flat and lifeless. Something to hide? If this were the case, every dealer review would mention it. if you take a shot of a rolex that is not strait on you cannot see if the date is centered. every shot you see of a po is taken to make the hands look the correct lenth. yes they absolutly do it to hide the flaws. all of them should be required to take atleast one shot of the dial head on.
Pugwash Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 yes they absolutly do it to hide the flaws. all of them should be required to take atleast one shot of the dial head on. Try it: Take a photo of a watch straight on and tell us how easy it is.
ubiquitous Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Try it: Take a photo of a watch straight on and tell us how easy it is. Definitely! Not as easy as it sounds... Quite honestly, there isn't much that one can hide from an angled shot; only thing that I can think of is date magnification. In most cases, alignment of date font and hand length can be determined from dealer pics; they do tend to take pics of the same watch from more than one angle
hk45ca Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Try it: Take a photo of a watch straight on and tell us how easy it is. i've done it to almost all of my watches and i'm no pro. if i can do it they certainly do it.
hk45ca Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Definitely! Not as easy as it sounds... Quite honestly, there isn't much that one can hide from an angled shot; only thing that I can think of is date magnification. In most cases, alignment of date font and hand length can be determined from dealer pics; they do tend to take pics of the same watch from more than one angle if you are not dead on a rolex you can't tell if the date is centered in the window and you cannot tell if the date mag is aligned. all of the shots of the po are taken with the minute hand away from the lens
robertk Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 There definitely hiding something? what is it??
ubiquitous Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 if you are not dead on a rolex you can't tell if the date is centered in the window and you cannot tell if the date mag is aligned. all of the shots of the po are taken with the minute hand away from the lens What is this "rolex" that you speak of? I've never heard of those before?
hk45ca Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 What is this "rolex" that you speak of? I've never heard of those before? the rolex is any with a date mag and a po is a omega. you know, the one theirs 29 versions of and incorrect lenth hands on most all of them.
ubiquitous Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Oh, so, like a 1660, 16613, 16618, 16600, etc.? And the Omega 2201.50.00? Never heard of those before...
dosanim Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Come on, Photo experts! Shine a truth for the rest of us! BTW, REp is REp, so I expect to see some flaw. Otherwise, very little flaw, but still will be, so I'll just enjoy well taken shots.
shimside11 Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 I have noticed several SMP rep fotos that have the bezel about three clicks off 12:00 to make the HE valve look positioned correctly. I've always thought that was amusing and amaturish.
Guest TTK Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 (edited) The title of your topic is.....how come none of the dealers give straight shots of their reps I think these will lend the lie to your statement....NOT A CASE OF EVERY DEALER.....IN FACT I BELIEVE IN THE INTEGRITY OF ALL THE DEALERS HERE........it's the members I refuse to trust.......if anyone is engaged in deceit.....well..........does the shoe fit or not.........conspiracy theorists are everywhere....! CARE TO REVISE THE TITLE OF YOUR TOPIC AND STOP MISLEADING OTHER MEMBERS......? Edited July 10, 2006 by TTK
KB Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 I have noticed several SMP rep fotos that have the bezel about three clicks off 12:00 to make the HE valve look positioned correctly. I've always thought that was amusing and amaturish. Actually the funny thing about this is that I (and I suspect most members) don't use the bezel to check the HE valve, I used the Ten o'clock marker on the dial. Ken
Pugwash Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 i've done it to almost all of my watches and i'm no pro. if i can do it they certainly do it. I'm not saying it's impossible, but which of these is correct?
artoero Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Take a picture of yourself, it is less nice if its taken in the front, so that's the answer.... I'm not saying it's impossible, but which of these is correct?
artoero Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 I think the first one is real. I'm not saying it's impossible, but which of these is correct?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now