phaedo Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Has been mentioned in another thread, but I guess it deserves its own thread http://www.puretimewatch.com/index.php?productID=491 Hasn't taken long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hoopty Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 (edited) It's the Platinum version that is way off, sub dial spacing, indices are way too off. V1 is much better in all respects. Edited August 31, 2008 by hoopty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sql_pl Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Sorry but V2 is a total disaster.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Working PR. Excellent. I wonder what's going on with the angled date wheel though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sql_pl Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 Excellent? The PR subdial is in totally wrong position. Also the date is the same as in 7 Days Portuguese - sunken and with strange cyclops on it. Far far away from the gen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asiparks Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 maybe it's a superrep of the incredibly rare, seldom seen 5003 ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertk Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 This is a copy of the earlier incorrect dial version that has been around for a long time. I have it. Nice watch but obviously wrong dial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanikai Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 The Inconsistencies are evident.. starting with the PR dial .. and the markers and ticks.. look at the 6 marker.. yikes !! I'm with Sp.. V-1 hands down.. V-1 .. matches up much better with the genuine.. even without close scrutiny.. at least the fonts correct on the DW.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossanti Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 V2 Looks UGLY n CRAP ! TOTAL DISASTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellomen Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 V2 Looks UGLY n CRAP ! TOTAL DISASTER i couldn't have said it better I wasn't that thrilled about V1, this V2 is butt ugly and and big step back from V1. Now let's hope they will come with a decent V3 without working PR and no recessed DW... if it ain't too much to ask Otherwise i'm keeping my hard earned money in the pocket, cause i'm not spending it on something that looks like a $10 Canal street rep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertk Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 i couldn't have said it better I wasn't that thrilled about V1, this V2 is butt ugly and and big step back from V1. Now let's hope they will come with a decent V3 without working PR and no recessed DW... if it ain't too much to ask Otherwise i'm keeping my hard earned money in the pocket, cause i'm not spending it on something that looks like a $10 Canal street rep. Hmmmm.......V1 looks like a $10 Canal Street rep? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dario33 Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 (edited) V2 is full of flaws -- not interested. Edited September 1, 2008 by Dario33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellomen Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 Hmmmm.......V1 looks like a $10 Canal Street rep? Nope... the $10 i mean is the V2... the V1 looks like a $25 canal street rep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 P O S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoTone Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 Ya know I come here for good quality information... I read threads like this to learn... And what do I find here today? A bunch of Wis' beating around the bush... Can you guys please tell us what you really think on this version... . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanikai Posted September 1, 2008 Report Share Posted September 1, 2008 it's obvious by now the naysayers are political activists... There have been comments such as "exellent" toward the 5004 when it is so obvious that it is a recycled older version dial .. very inacurate in every respect it seems to me that these threads are going in the direction not so much about the 5002 replication but instead, passively about the Dealer who has it listed.. sure the PR on the 5002 is fixed and the DW is sunken.. like so many other reps with Asian movements ..(as was alluded to earlier) It's about the "singer" and definately not about the "song" How can the 5002 be called a "Canal St" rep ? what qulaifies it to be given that euphamism ? the fixed PR ? the sunken DW ? Common .. really.... tell it like it is ... rather than attack the dealer or maker.. discredit the rep. .... of course it's not 1:1 .. but what "replication" is ?? nuff o the Games... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyby75 Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 V1...Far better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.