Is this a gen Tudor Sub?

[Martyd3]

[chris5264]

I saw that one too......looks decent but I always worry about a strange low price....I just picked up one for under 300 (usd) and put the pics next to each other. Looked identical exept in the pics of the one on TZ that you have, the print looks cleaner....so who knows these days.

[polexpete]

Hey guys,

for me the rehaut looks too deep and the pearl is way off although that doesn't mean its a rep for sure, the insert could have been replaced. Check the rehaut on my gen 7016, much shallower. You need a good look at the movement and case engravings to be sure.

Cheers

P.

[tmg]

Hard to tell for sure but the bezel insert is aftermarket and Pete has a point the rehaut looks too deep. Here's another reference shot of my gen 7016, although it's not quite a straight on photo.

Nice watch BTW P!!!

[blue_sphere]

Isnt the tudor logo on that watch wrong? I thought it was a shield (like the two watches shown here to compare)

[Tribal]

No its not Gen.

There are a lot of these ones on the Market.

Dial is a reprint on these, also the Case is aftermarket.

They come with Tudor signed Eta but they are also not gen.

You could get them cheap in the past in Thailand

[tmg]

Isnt the tudor logo on that watch wrong? I thought it was a shield (like the two watches shown here to compare)

The original Tudor logo was the small rose. It changed to the shield some time in the mid to late 60's.

[ubiquitous]

Logo was a Rose on the oldies...

And changed to a shield on the later models...

[ssparky]

My old Tudor has a Rose, but the print is gold without the swiss made and nuke readings on dial

My old Tudor has a Rose, but the print is gold without the swiss made and nuke readings on dial