pizzanooo

All of the above... BTW, I do have my opinion... Watches, Women, & Fishing are the same.... Always a fresh-- 1 -- moving up...

Looks like it finally caught up with him, no longer a registered user.

909 Not in the current mix on site. Told from the 90`s.

Picked this one up about a month ago and just love it more each day. I`m told its from the mid 90`s or so, have`nt done any search yet on it. So new, still had the film on the back of watch. Love the dial & has a 7750 movement in her. Hopefully my pics are ok when loaded, enjoy.

One of the most accurate reps out there, nice choice.

If your a Powerseller and accept pp, your foolproof from what I know there.

Oh, by the way --- welcome to the forum. Sorry, I am easily distracted by really good beer, --- and good watches, --- and good looking women.

I have a 063 with a 2893 Mov. Closest Pam without mods I have seen yet. With a closed caseback, whats your reasoning for a Gen rotor?

I`m just a damn dago, little bit of enough of that.

Not having much in the past to do with Breitling, this one is sweet. Thanks buddy, now I have another watch to think about.

I really need to get a 111. Nice shots.

Christ, I just read both those Forums on it. Get a Flocking life. I would`nt waste my time worring over [censored] like that! I could go on about it, but then I would be too... Like them. I have a good life, and have learned to spend my money wisely. Thats why I`m here with you fellas.

Yes, Sean is still the Man...

This one is about as close as I could find, its on the bay now. Looks about the same. Owner says its from around 1999 and the high bidder is Watchcrusher. This guy buys alot of Rollies. I`m no expert but maybe after 2000 when they used their own inhouse movement it moved the dials abit. But like I said before, something about the written part in his ad just does`nt feel right. Just noticed he has claimed he has sold 3 cars, but if you look at his feedback, I only see he has had 2 sales ever. First pic is a gen, second is his.

Subdials look ok. On the watches age on top it says 2000 or newer in heading, could be a mistake on his part. W series serial # is from the 1995 era, so the serial # jives with it. The seconds at 9:00 would be correct for that year, I believe it changed around 2000. But something in his ad description on the watch and his talking it up, just makes me suspicious.

Yesterday I just popped my 196 on a bracelet. Now thats Heavy Metal...

That should end this post... Amen.

Characters, Were all Bozos on this Bus. I look over enough of the other Forums to know the Bozos are everywhere. Here, I see alot of education on what is, and what should not be... Simple truth be told is, alot of watch education is here and straight forth. Hand Me Those Pliers, Don`t Crush That Dwarf...

19 = 243 Not counting the ones in the bone-yard.

Wow, thought control.

45mm is the bigboy of the model and correct, massive on the wrist and a real looker in Orange.

I too from Seattle, if they get by next round, watch out. GO DOGS...

It gave me enough time to get up and fetch another beer and see the ending. Not now...