When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
-
Posts
6,320 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Everything posted by alligoat
-
You could switch from a jubilee band to an oyster band w/ solid mid links.
-
Yeh, I don't use gorilla glue, or epoxy on inserts. I've used the GS Hypo-cement and done OK. It's not as strong, but it sure makes it easier if you're removing the insert! here's an insert for $24+, http://cgi.ebay.com/BLACK-BEZEL-INSERT-FIT-ROLEX-SEA-DWELLER-WATCH-PARTS_W0QQitemZ250506776975QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item3a535e118f
-
You're there with the cg's, looking good. The problem w/ recessing the insert on the SSD is that it makes the crystal height more pronounced- so I'd go w/ 'less is best' in this case. Better luck on your next insert. I used an x-acto knife to enlarge the hole before installing the WM pearl- worked OK- just go slowly and keep testing so you don't over enlarge.
-
Movement looks similar to the 1225 manual wind. I'd figure it's from the 40s or 50s, fugly dial, is that a gold case?
-
I've been picking up used gen inserts in good condition for $50-60 on ebay. Just have to be patient- Sheartime has been a good source.
-
Dial feet and hand sizes for the 2824 and 2836 are the same. But w/ the 1680 case, you need to use the 2836 because of the stem position. Stem on the 2824 is too high. Eurotimez sells the 1680 case only.
-
I agree w/ By-Tor, the watch jmarin posted looks gen to me- even looks like a Swiss- T<25 dial. To bad he didn't start the bidding at $2500- he might have gotten somewhere- bet it doesn't sell at $3K. The first guy's a scammer!
-
Original MBW 1680's are actually 5513 Original Polex Design cases w/ L serials- copied from the last of the 5513's built in the late 80's, I guess. So either case should work- both take the 2836-2. If you're using an older movement, then it might not work- 2784, or whatever...
-
Pictures suck, but it looks like laser etching on the case, low crystal, none of the Rolex paperwork/boxes look relevant. $1200 for a rep bracelet that isn't even correct- sounds like a pile of bullcaca.
-
A couple of others come to mind- Natalie over at NDTrading Corp, http://ndtradingcorp.com/zen/ Kinda expensive like Phong, but good selection of vintage rolex parts. Jewelryoutlet555 is the sister company to wholesaleoutlet990, http://myworld.ebay.com/jewelryoutlet555/ Good rolex inserts, but not always the best aftermarket parts- buy w/ caution.
-
Poor Man's Watch forum, www.pmwf.com/, shows the 5513 insert as 36.5 OD and 30.30 ID, if it's any help. They sell a nice rep insert which people put the (aftermarket like Clark's) acrylic pearl in to make a nice gen like insert. But since you have gen, you're set!
-
Definitely a 'tweener'. A cross between the 1665 and 16600. With a better 1665 type dial and insert (small, all acrylic pearl), you could get back to a 1665 Comex/Sea-Dweller. Or even a 5513 dial- early unmarked Comex-type 5513 w/ HEV.
-
This is why people install gen/aftermarket parts- then you know you have all of the seals. A real 24-7030 case tube has two o-ring seals in it, the crown has one at the base of the stem/crown cap and there is the one on the exterior at the base of the case tube. So it's really a quad lock system! But Rolex never changed the name- the 24-702 crown and tube assembly was the first trip-lock assembly- two in the tube and one on the crown- none at the exterior of the tube. Your deal will probably still work, to 50 or 100m, maybe.
-
There are slight variations in plastic crystals- sounds like your T-19 is too big on the OD. Might look at Ofrei's- they have a number of T-19's. The 5513 was produced for almost 30 years- from the early 60's to 1989 so there are some slight variations- look at what Ofrei has and compare it to the ID of the 315-5513 insert. Sounds like you're building a 1680 w/ a T-19 no cyclops crystal.
-
1 hr and 35 minutes- $2550.00. The last minute might be fun to watch.
-
Yep, old boxy 4 insert replaced by a new triangular 4 insert- cool that they sent you back the old insert! I like the edge of the lug picture- no arris on the edge- that fine bevel we see from time to time on the edge of some Rolexes. Actually, I could only find it on my 1680 WM rep- not on any of my gens. Of course, all of my gens are 27 years old or older! Cool pics, thanks JJ.
-
Any way to shave CG's without removing crown?
alligoat replied to clkcadet's topic in The Rolex Area
I wouldn't recommend pulling the crown out to the time setting position and filing away. You're bound to get crap in the movement. Use a 1.2mm screwdriver to remove the stem. On the Asian 21j you just have to poke the release button gently while pulling the stem out. I also like to remove the case tube when I'm filing cg's- helps if you're installing gen or aftermarket parts. -
I have not seen this rep yet from our dealers. But I would expect that we will see it soon- Josh, Paul or Andrew might be able to get it. I don't know this site- prices are so-so, movement is an asian eta clone marked Rolex 3135- no big deal. Case looks interesting, I don't have a problem w/ the rehaut, the M832118 SN on the case almost harks back to a noob factory SN- just one off of the old 117 last three digits of the old noobs. No crown guards and no date mag are interesting. These guys also carry the TWBest cases- those are hard to find these days- ProwatchPolo might be another dealer possibility.
-
Although gen sub and SD's have different insert sizes, I thought the SSD rep had the same size insert as the Subs do- Chinese engineering!
-
Movement review - Seagull ETA copy, how to spot this one
alligoat replied to RWG Technical's topic in General Discussion
Thanks, RG. Great write-up! -
I agree w/ freddy, the 1560 is the wrong movement. It actually was replaced by the 1570 in the middle 60's, and the 1570 is the correct movement for a 1665. But let's get one thing straight first, you can't make a gen watch out of rep and gen parts. The best you can hope to do is build a nice franken. Is it a good investment- probably not, IMO. Another consideration is the quality of parts, you get what you pay for and the $98 DRSD isn't a very good case to begin with. For the long term investment, you'd be better off buying a gen 1500 Oyster Perpetual Date for $1000-1250. If you want a nice rep, buy an MBW DRSD and make some mods- $500-1000 A franken DRSD- a good one will run $1500-2500. But a gen GWSD will run a min of $7K, probably and a gen DRSD- $25K up ????
-
Go to the Vintage Rolex Forum- someone there got beat by $100, can't remember who, way out of my league!
-
I can't recall seeing a gold sub w/ diamonds. Just Serti dials, in two tone. There are GMTIIC's out there with diamond bezels, can't remember if there are any in full gold. Plenty of gold DJ's w/ diamonds of every sort.
-
That bracelet is pretty well shot- stretched to the point of being beyond hope. If you can find someone to redo it, that would be great- I haven't found anyone yet at this point. I've got a couple that have some stretch, but luckily in much better shape than that one. Good luck, but I wouldn't pay over a couple hundred dollars, myself- actually I'd pass, but in your case, I'd say don't pay more.
-
Very nice, seafoam. Date mag looks great. I think there are something like four variations of the gen watch. That Robert Maron pic is interesting- note the serifs on the bezel numbers- a very pristine example.