jmarin.72

Ok guys here it is,finished at last already on my wrist and boy i am happy Came yesterday from Domi after a second trip back to the Master since those guys down in Postal Services don't know anything about handling an item marked as "FRAGILE" ,just take a look at the pic to get a view of the state that the watch was delivered to me the first time.Of course this was not Domenico's fault by all means So i sent the watch back to the Master who gladly accepted to help me again at no cost of course and thankfully the watch is now resting on my wrist Mille grazie amico mio Domenico e un grande orologiaio e' una risorsa preziosa per la nostra comunit

Yeap...forgot to mention those as well!!!

I bet he meant a dozen new "Daytonas" and not shirts

Chrono pushers are waaaaayyyy off!!!This is one of the first things i notice on a REP Daytona...

:thumbsupsmileyanim:

Thank you Niko!!! But writing is easier than speaking my friend...i cannot speak the language yet,need to practice everyday

Salve Domi,mi piace molto la lingua Italiana!!! E una bella e melodica lingua ma bisogna molto lavoro!!!Mi auguro che in sei mesi di tempo per essere in grado di parlare molto bene.

Looks like it but the angle of the photo i misleading...

What is strange is that this watch was presented in a GEN forum GTG and no one ever bothered to dispute the authenticity. Seems that they assumed since it is a PRO HUNTER all the inconsistencies to the gen ROLEX are sensible...

Also it wouldn't make any sense to make the GMT hand shorter

PRO HUNTER fonts are definitely way off

A photo of a GEN PRO HUNTER Photo of the watch in doubt

A photo of a GEN PRO HUNTER

Yes but...the word PRO-HUNTER has different fonts than the original,also the SEL's look bad and i really can't see any kind of AR on the crystal.Bezel numbers seem to thick next to the one posted on the PRO HUNTER site,etched crown is quite visible and the GMT hand is shorter than the original (ROLEX GMT IIC as well as PRO HUNTER) Also the ROLEX CORONET on the dial is thicker....

As posted on a gen forum....what is your opinion?rep or gen?

This is my 79320

Just an update,today i got a gen insert so there it is next to the old one For me is the No 1 mod someone should perform on this watch.

:thumbsupsmileyanim: Well no wonder,considering the fact that when some idiot posted pics of his rep GMT IIc it took them 25 posts until someone finally noticed that the gmt hand was not in the correct order So much for the "Rolex dials are always perfect,if your dial has some kind of imperfection then it is a rep" thing!!!

Just take a look at this GMT MASTER's 11 o'clock hour marker http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=113920

Welcome to the club Valerian!!! Benvenuto nel club

You know Nanuq...the word "DOXA" is Greek and means (in a free translation) "GLORY"

I sure will Andy

Well there were a lot of ppl involved (RCKH,PT,CONCEPTA,DOMI) but all parts where eventually sourced and a V1 3789 with ETA 7750 has finaly been upgraded next step ,gen dial and hands Problem is that i had a little accident during shipping,"HANDLE WITH CARE" means nothing to the PO guys and the watch is currently back to Domi (i wouldn't dare messing with a gen movement)for daywheel re-alingment,and check of the chrono function cause the main chrono hand is sweeping erratically Well accidents do happen in this hobby