Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

ubiquitous

Platinum Member
  • Posts

    13,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Posts posted by ubiquitous

  1. Funny how names become associated to things... McQueen 1665, Clapton 1680... PN Daytona. What's even funnier is how many of these associations are incorrect. Mr. Newman, as you mentioned above, wears his black 6263 plain dial, Steve McQueen wore a 5513, and Mr. Clapton...? I've seen a number of different Rolex on his wrist, so I don't know how that one was started (though I believe I had heard that this one was a result of one of his personal red 1680's having sold for a record amount- Is this enough to tie someone's name to in order to create some sort of cache for the brand?).

    What's next? The Nanuq 6536?

    :lol:

  2. A great topic of debate and controversy!

    The collectors and dealers believe it's the 39 and 41- The movie has nothing to do with it. The true epitome of 'PN' is the very first cosmograph with exotic dial (2 and 3 color variations), pump pushers, etc. The later models with screw down crowns with exotical dial are still called PN, but not the 'true' PN in collector and enthusiasts' eyes.

  3. I think Ziggy's had a change of heart with the new 7750's- Vast improvements have been made, and he has noted an overall improvement in their construction, build and parts quality.

    But if it's relating to which is better for a vintage Daytona... I'd take neither. I'll stick with my finicky, unreliable V23 copy movement :lol: It might be unreliable, but it's more 'correct' for the watch in terms of appearance and character.

    *shrug*

    Heh... Just read Zig's latest post on the Asian 7750's.... I stand corrected! :lol:

  4. I think Ziggy's had a change of heart with the new 7750's- Vast improvements have been made, and he has noted an overall improvement in their construction, build and parts quality.

    But if it's relating to which is better for a vintage Daytona... I'd take neither. I'll stick with my finicky, unreliable V23 copy movement :lol: It might be unreliable, but it's more 'correct' for the watch in terms of appearance and character.

    *shrug*

  5. I've had it- Nice watch overall, but it has some flaws. Just a quick few from memory-

    -20mm lugs (should be 19mm)

    -Symmetric pusher spacing

    -Pushers do not actually screw down (but have the appearance of being screw down)

    -Bezel is incorrect

    There are a few more, but you get the point.

    Still, a nice watch, and the Venus inside is indeed a true work horse!

    Of course, my favorite 'out-of-the-box' rep is still the DW with the V23 copy movement. Sure, the 6:00 is frozen, and doesn't work, but unlike the 7750, the mystery copy movement has correct subdial spacing, and beats slower (21600bph), which is closer to genuine (19800bph).

    28303-380.jpg

    28303-381.jpg

    28303-382.jpg

    28303-383.jpg

    28303-384.jpg

    The ultimate, however would be a 6263 built from a case kit using a true V72 :)

  6. I have always loved the tourbillon... And especially these chinese made ones, as they are an affordable means to have an interesting complication. However, I've always been a little cautious about the movement and it's reliability. But, I just might give one a try. Maybe, just maybe.

    That, and I have always wondered in what situation I might wear such an extravagant piece? For someone who's daily wardrobe consists of faded jeans and untucked Ralph Lauren Polos, I don't know that the watch would mesh well with my attire :)

  7. Ohhhh yeahhh, that's a sweet strap! I can't wait to see pics of the watch in question!

    To be honest, I'm kind of hesitant to even wear this strap. It's NOS, never worn, not a crease on it... Don't know that I could ever find another :unsure: So... I'm trying to find another PVD buckled Dirky.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up