Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

slickdick

Member
  • Posts

    1,173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by slickdick

  1. Yes, trust him on that one. Especially for the 1680. Minor crook wil look 2.5 times as bad trough the cyclops. Great tutorial mate
  2. Yes, it is normal. Be patiend.
  3. I have to disagree. Within 2 weeks to file a dispute? A definite noob in my book if you'd aske me. And to acuse the admin team of discriminating paying members over non-paying is absolutely ridiculous. I have to say the protocol of the admin team in these kind of situations is of the highest class. Listening to both sides of the story before jumping on the bandwagon the lynch a guy. Here on RWG one is not outlawed just by mere acusation. By the way, this is out of my real life experience with a deal gone sour. Admin team handled it exact like watchmeister posted. IMO since RWG itself is not a part in the agreement between users they go beyond of their factual responsibility.
  4. Considering the JEES SISS like engraving on the movement you could very well be right.
  5. It is a rep. A pretty good rep, though not perfect. Dont take it to the AD.
  6. There was a thread about thisone recently, its missing crucial hard to find and pricey parts.
  7. You have to be real luckyyy then to get some soup
  8. Good for you buddy!
  9. I don't get it. The case is wokkier than wok. IMO it ruins the total watch. No Relax ever came in wok. Two complete different watches. Why?
  10. I was wondering about the crown. Tough totally unsigned exepct from the movemnet, i think a signed crown of some sort would add character and history to the watch. Eitherhow enjoy!
  11. Stunning build. Congrats.
  12. The watch (case) will also be different considering the stem-height is on the 2892 is higher vs the 2836. Both movements are good, both approx same power reserve, beat frequeancy, hand sizes. The 92 is of later type design and is therefor better overall but not by much.
  13. Links would help.
  14. Good comparison. IMO all cases are plausible. It is hard to compare since some cases look like they have been polished once or twice.
  15. The pic show a genuine.
  16. Sure it will affect the balance. Depending on the position your watch will run either fast or slow. Hence the smart heads came up with something to level this out, its called the Tourbillon. More Does it live its promise? in short: No. If you want acuracy atomic sync'ed 3 usd quartz performes best. Unfortunalty a quartz movement has no soul.
  17. In general, the plexi dwellers always lugholes. Ealry saphires lugholes, later on, dont know what year, sanse holes.
  18. slickdick

    WM9

    From time to time they pop on the sales section. You can't get them new anymore.
  19. Dont think Nanuq ment this for you. This place is known to welcome options as long as it remains a civil discussion.
  20. Come on... your just jealous and sorry you did not find out beforehand. You do know that www.swiss-replica-watches.eu replicas are actually swiss replicas don't you?
  21. Nice watch. Though the movement is not the same as the seagull however. Yours looks like (expensive version) Ronda Harley with offset positioned rotor center seconds and date. It sure does looks good in finish. Where did you get the watch?
  22. Close enough: I will take a couple
  23. If you don't use proper tools you will fcuk up your watch. Either take it up the a willing smith (though 100 usd is a rippoff), or invest in tools. In the rep game it is nice if you can handle these relative simple things yourself.
  24. Strange, with seagul mov't there should be no reason for offset pushers vs crown: Did the cartel copied DW's MM case?
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up