StormTooper4 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Posted September 23, 2010 You'd better be careful which you pick up , thank you so much for the comparison really very impressive , that Date is spot on as far as I can tell from you pictures ST4
dieter111 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Posted September 23, 2010 Great review!!!!! I know what I'll be wearing on my wrist soon...
Whatever123 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Posted September 23, 2010 Thanks for the review, great work! Definitely on my list the 236...
mactower Posted September 23, 2010 Report Posted September 23, 2010 Thanks for the amazing review. Ordered one this afternoon! Have a custom ostrich strap ready for this bad-boy!
fishgodeep Posted September 24, 2010 Report Posted September 24, 2010 Best review possible for this watch - Kudos and thanks FGD
Defender110 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Posted September 24, 2010 Thanks for the reveiw and spending time to take side-by-side shots! it makes running back and for between pics so much easier when the side-by-sides are done together in the same light, angle and with NO Watermarks! :-) while it may not take a ETA7753 it sure is a great rep..
bollobandit Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Posted September 25, 2010 Bollo- Fabulous review. Overall it looks fantastic. Must be the best out of the box PAM rep. Although that date is definitely based on a 7750 rather than 7753 it definitely passes the visual test - huge improvement over the A7750. I really have to look closely to see the difference. The CG looks to be another story. Wrong shaped lever and hole in the cg body and the funny part is that it is probably more effort to machine the curved top of the cg lever versus the flat on the gen. Pick up a gen cg for the rep and sell the gen. Haha....thanks bud. Honestly I picked up the rep to see what all the hype was about and have to say it's exceeded my expectation but at the end we all know a gen is a gen
wheaton26 Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 thanks to the bollobandit and this post, i've just contacted my dealer. i've inquired about a swiss version ... does anyone know if that's in the works? thanks again for the review!
Mickey Padge Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 Great write up and pics! Still no movement breakdown yet?
TK471 Posted September 27, 2010 Report Posted September 27, 2010 Great review. Thanks for taking the time.
HauteHippie Posted September 27, 2010 Report Posted September 27, 2010 Nice writeup. The 236 is indeed the latest super rep. For me, the crown, lever, and pin are the problematic areas. And of course that pin can be fixed. The dial is good, but the subdial print is a little off. Just a little. All in all one of the best reps out of the box in a long while!
OSRep Posted September 27, 2010 Report Posted September 27, 2010 Fantastic review and comparison. Thanks for the effort Bollo! Watch looks awesome, im definitely getting one soon. Not sure who to order from though
jdkno Posted October 11, 2010 Report Posted October 11, 2010 Great review!!! The side by sides do really help as already mentioned. A few questions if I may. What do the quick pushers near th lugs acctualy do? How do you set the date with the recessed pusher? How is the rep lume, I know no where near the gen but any better than typical rep? I take it all of the new daylights 163, 196, 236, and 250 should all be pretty much even in terms of accuracy. I am realy liking the panda dial of the 163.
Watchmeister Posted October 11, 2010 Report Posted October 11, 2010 I don't think the accuracy will be the same. Some have the wrong crown guard(162 for sure, perhaps 188 and 196 depending on series number). Some probably have wrong millesimation on the case back (xxx/500 when it should be 1500, etc.) and I also suspect different dials will be more accurate than others. I know that on the 162 it is still unclear whether the sub dials are exactly the right color. So pick carefully. But yes the overall quality should be about the same except that QC pics have shown some pieces to have better aligned crown guards than others, etc. The quick pusher changes the date. It requires a tool of some form to push the little button. A pencil actually suffices. So you should decide on your favorite one and research it.
mossanti Posted October 11, 2010 Report Posted October 11, 2010 As all the guys said here..very nice report indeed! thanks for the review!
leitztozeiss Posted October 16, 2010 Report Posted October 16, 2010 First order from King just arrived. Amazing service.
TK471 Posted October 17, 2010 Report Posted October 17, 2010 After a few days with mine, I have to say I'm most impressed by the crown and crown lever. The crown is the best out of the box that I've seen, and the lever snaps tight. With the service, mine is working beautifully. Great watch!
Speedman Posted October 18, 2010 Report Posted October 18, 2010 Ordered one from Lay, cant wait to get it Thanks for a great review
PeteM Posted October 18, 2010 Report Posted October 18, 2010 The key thing on all these PAM reps with Asian 7753s as you get them is to get them serviced straight away, its worth the extra wait!! I say that more so than I would with the other rep movements although its always advisable
username here Posted October 20, 2010 Report Posted October 20, 2010 are all the dealers selling the same model?
Watchmeister Posted October 20, 2010 Report Posted October 20, 2010 Yes. But definitely go with one who sends QC pics to make sure you get a good crown guard.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now