Montecarlo801 Posted October 19, 2013 Report Posted October 19, 2013 Looks sketchy to me but what do you pros think?
PATerai Posted October 19, 2013 Report Posted October 19, 2013 Im not an expert but im pretty sure i can wok my vegetables in that thing
ArkoN Posted October 19, 2013 Report Posted October 19, 2013 Im no expert but the dial looks horrible and the date font looks wrong too. Then the bracelet doenst look right either. The font on the insert look too fat for me. lets see what the others say. But for me its a fake and I dont see gen parts on it. But let the real experts cime in
Montecarlo801 Posted October 19, 2013 Author Report Posted October 19, 2013 Started looking at the pics closer and there is so much wrong with it. I'm surprised that the case is drilled.
Montecarlo801 Posted October 19, 2013 Author Report Posted October 19, 2013 Im no expert but the dial looks horrible and the date font looks wrong too. Then the bracelet doenst look right either. The font on the insert look too fat for me. lets see what the others say. But for me its a fake and I dont see gen parts on it. But let the real experts cime in I agree, man. I wanted it to be real to the point I started convincing myself there was a possibility. Too good of a deal usually means just that.
Montecarlo801 Posted October 19, 2013 Author Report Posted October 19, 2013 Sorry to even post this. I had blinders on. I have a gen 76100 and thought the case was close but quickly realized all the many many flaws.
ceocorona Posted October 19, 2013 Report Posted October 19, 2013 That is not only a rep but a terrible rep of the 16613... Insert, crown, crown guard, DWO font, dial font, cornet, SEL fitment, etc... You get the picture... Bad rep.
Montecarlo801 Posted October 20, 2013 Author Report Posted October 20, 2013 That is not only a rep but a terrible rep of the 16613... Insert, crown, crown guard, DWO font, dial font, cornet, SEL fitment, etc... You get the picture... Bad rep. So right. there was a place in my area that converted gen ss subs to two tones with bad aftermarket dials, bands, etc. I was hoping that the case was gen do bad I ignoring the obvious. Thanks everyone.
Jkay Posted October 20, 2013 Report Posted October 20, 2013 Not only is the rehaut wokky, but whoever drilled the lug holes made that classic noob modder error of counter-sinking the holes.
SSTEEL Posted October 20, 2013 Report Posted October 20, 2013 As mentioned above, the wok look is a giveaway, plus several other tells, including crooked indices.
panerai153 Posted October 22, 2013 Report Posted October 22, 2013 The dial sort of looks lie the one that was on my old Eddie Lee TW Best 16613. Those thick surrounds on the dial plots are similar. Not much right with this one!! Run away
polexpete Posted October 23, 2013 Report Posted October 23, 2013 Sorry to even post this. I had blinders on. I have a gen 76100 and thought the case was close but quickly realized all the many many flaws. Don't be sorry, its good you posted it. The more people know about the good, the bad and the ugly the better ... This is an old rep from way before the days of super subs and maybe even this forum ... Cheers P
pam007 Posted October 23, 2013 Report Posted October 23, 2013 Wut I thought all Rolex's were fake. Sent from my Delorean 10 years in the future using Tapatalk now Free
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now