P4GTR Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 ive been lurking moreso on RWG1, but I'm liking this place more and more. Not much to say here, you've all seen it before. But heres the pics of my new SS Sub from Joshua. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 Congratulations on your beautiful new Sub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iglutikut Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 nice indeed.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted May 29, 2007 Report Share Posted May 29, 2007 (edited) deleted by bk Edited May 30, 2007 by bklm1234 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P4GTR Posted May 30, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 overly conical rehaut, cyclop and date window too far right, no rehaut thickness, how crystal, wrong crystal bevel. -bk Why stop there? Lazer etched crown at 6 o'clock too large, crown itself too large. Incorrect pearl, incorrect model number on hologram (should be 16610 not 11610). Still about $4800 cheaper then the gen, and I'm happy. Thanks for looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 (edited) deleted by bk Edited May 30, 2007 by bklm1234 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 (edited) deleted by bk Edited May 30, 2007 by bklm1234 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 @ bklm1234 what is your problem? P4GTR has said a polite hello and showed his sub that he bought off Josh and he is very happy with it and that is all that matters. Make another attack and you're going to earn yourself a warning. Ken PS. Hello and welcome to our forum P4GTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 fine. withdrawn. -bk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cableguy Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 what is wrong with that pearl? I must be blind cause it looks pretty good to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P4GTR Posted May 30, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Thank you guys. Thanks for the PM's as well, you know who you are. bklm1234, You look like you were on a mission man. Fortunately I didn't not get a chance to read your posts. Its a watch. It will not end world hunger or resurect the dead, i'm sorry to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 (edited) if i came across as overbearing, sorry about that. of course you didn't ask for a review, i shouldn't have given one. i'm not on a mission. i helped many people on this and other boards pick and mod rollies. there are a lot of tells beyond the usual: etched crown, pearl, CGs (btw, who cares about hologram). if you knew them, you wouldn't have bought this one. oops - uninvited critique again. i guess i'm not welcome to share my knowledge. same to you, it's just a watch. obviously you were offended by my critique. you cool it too. anyway, 99% people won't be able to call this one out. enjoy your sub, my friend -bk Edited May 31, 2007 by bklm1234 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P4GTR Posted May 31, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 Unfortunately I cannot lock myself in a basement and read RWG 16 hours a day to find the best of the best of the best everything. I was under the impression that Josh/andrew were the best bet (from my days on RWG1). Now on here, I hear about MBW, all these uber mods, etc.. Oh well, I'm still pretty happy with it honestly. Do I wish it was the best rep out there? Sure. At one point I even thought it was. I was a little offended with your first post, yes, but I did not see the others before they were editted. I don't mind the criticism so much as the way you kind've seemed to shove it in without so much is a some lube or a hello. Really, its no big deal, you seem nice enough in your other posts anyways. I assume it was my watch you were disgusted with and not me. Truthfully, if you have suggestions as to modding, or a better more accurate source, Im all ears. I just dont want to pull a faux pah and ask people for that information blatently. Im inclined to learn as much as I can. I have been bitten, and my wallet is going to shrink. In the immediate future I would like a superocean, then on to researching a nice pan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 i was too automatic when i saw the post. my critique was uncalled for. pretty stupid. I have a 1st gen VIPmariner dial, a noobmariner datewheel, and a correct mag cyclop. With them, you can fix the date window flaw. You can have them for free. It will be a totally awesome sub. Somebody did that mod before and the watch looks great. This is an improvement. I hope this doesn't stick with you as your watch being imperfect and a thone to you. All subs are imperfect. Modding them is a lot of fun and satisfying. PM your address to me. -bk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cableguy Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 wow what a nice guy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ekhunter Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 what is wrong with that pearl? I must be blind cause it looks pretty good to me The way I improved the pearl, and I use that term lightly, on my rep sub from Josh was to add a small, and I mean small dab of model glue to it. You can still see the lume through it, and it looks a lot better. Just my two cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 @ekhunter: yours is a smart way to improve the pearl 'cause that resembles the pearl construction. for those who haven't read my 16610 buying guide on rwi, I extracted the pearl section here: Insert Pearl I put insert pearl in its own section because it's such an important signature of the sub. Most people don't know the construction of the insert pearl since it's so small. What makes up the look? So for the 1st time, insert pearl fully disclosed. At an angle, the pearl seems to fill the ring edge to edge. But this spherical edge-to-edge thingie is just a shinny, clear cover. Under the cover, the real white pearl sit recessed inside the ring. This is why the pearl looks recessed but look at it from angle it's not. This little known construction is what makes it look like it does. It confuses the hell out of our rep makes. Or do they actually care? Some pearls are pretty funny-looking. The Zit The Flat-top Don't pick a sub rep by the pearl though. The pearl can be fixed but something like rehaut cannot. You can replace the pearl with a watchmaterial pearl which has the same construction as the gen but of course not perfect (pearl is slightly yellowy but at normal distnaces, it really looks like the gen. -bk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cableguy Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 thanks a lot bk!! those pics are great, I have a insert on its way to me, but in the mean time i'm gonna try to fill in the pearl with some clear nail polish, think that would work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emuozz Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 Thanks bk I didn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P4GTR Posted June 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2007 Many thanks bk. Awesome insight into the pearl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docblackrock Posted June 4, 2007 Report Share Posted June 4, 2007 Here's my tip on modding an aftermarket pearl (first pic which had a fairly accurate construction to begin with) - tip is on p.2 after the gen pearl installation. http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=29797 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiss Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 I know the experienced guys don't like it anymore, but I think it is my next one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now