Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

  • Current Donation Goals

90 rep pic posted on paner**ti by a paner**ti?

Guest Sql_pl

By Guest Sql_pl
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Sql_pl

Guest Sql_pl

Posted
Posted

I was browsing their forum and found that pic:

36411-39229.jpg

Doesn't that 090 look a bit... well incorrect?

I mean look at the date mag and crown...

OR am I wrong?

Cheers!

Estaban Newbie

Estaban

Posted
Posted

Maciek,

I thought the exact same thing. The 005 looks gen to me. There is no mag on the other, however, the cyclops looks bigger than the one on my 029. Could be the angle.

KB Apprentice

KB

Posted
Posted

To be honest because of the angle and the shadow caused by the hand I just wouldn't be comfortable calling it.

Ken

Willith Newbie

Willith

Posted
Posted

I agree the mag on my PAM090 is weak too. It's hard to tell from that picture because of the angle. The crown does look a little off, but not 100% sure that's a rep...... :huh:

archibald Newbie

archibald

Posted
Posted
from that pic it is difficult to say if it is a gen or a rep...i good pic could tell us if it is a rep!

All I know is some medical entity should do a study on the calcium intake of Paneristi--is it just me, or do posters on Paneristi.com tend to have wrists much thinner than most grown men? Now that I think about it, maybe that's a better job for that psychologist that keeps threatening to do a study on Panerai owners...

sssurfer Newbie

sssurfer

Posted
Posted
All I know is some medical entity should do a study on the calcium intake of Paneristi--is it just me, or do posters on Paneristi.com tend to have wrists much thinner than most grown men? Now that I think about it, maybe that's a better job for that psychologist that keeps threatening to do a study on Panerai owners...

It has already been published on the New England Paneristi Journal on Metabolics (#421, Dec 2005, pp 64-67).

They demonstrated that calcium intake is actually accounting for as low as 10% of the PAM and Reps Owners Small Wrist Syndrome (PROSWS) size. The remaining 90% being due to: lacking of Vitamine D income (25%), and expecially lacking of exposition to direct sunlight (65%).

It appeared that PAM owners (and expecially Paneristi) do actually prefer to lurk in the darkness in order to have their Tritium, Luminova and Superluminova hands-and-marks looking brighter. Brief outcomes to sunlight seem only due to the need for L and SL recharge, while Tritium owners could make for a vampire's envy.

About the psychological issues, there are concerns about relations between PROSWS and the evidence that OP actually produces large watches. Relations between this finding and masochism are currently under study, and preliminary results could be published in a few months.

archibald Newbie

archibald

Posted
Posted
It has already been published on the New England Paneristi Journal on Metabolics (#421, Dec 2005, pp 64-67).

They demonstrated that calcium intake is actually accounting for as low as 10% of the PAM and Reps Owners Small Wrist Syndrome (PROSWS) size. The remaining 90% be due to: lacking of Vitamine D income (25%), and expecially lacking of exposition to direct sunlight (65%).

It appeared that PAM owners (and expecially Paneristi) do actually prefer to lurk in the dark in order to have their Tritium, Luminova and Superluminova hands-and-marks looking brighter. Brief outcames to sunlight seem only due to the need for L and SL recharge, while Tritium owners could make for a vampire's envy.

About the psychological issues, there are concerns about relations between PROSWS and the evidence that OP actually produces large watches. Relations between this finding and masochism are currently under study, and preliminary results could be published within a few months.

:lol::Jumpy: Marco, you've missed your true calling: The Italian Mark Twain!!! Parody at it's best...

sssurfer Newbie

sssurfer

Posted
Posted

Wow... :blush:

Guest TTK

Guest TTK

Posted
Posted

It's one of our members....I sold him the 090....and can definitely state who it is......WTF he should be posting a rep on Paneristi.com I don't know.....but he's a sick puppy....!

sssurfer Newbie

sssurfer

Posted
Posted
It's one of our members....I sold him the 090....and can definitely state who it is......WTF he should be posting a rep on Paneristi.com I don't know.....but he's a sick puppy....!

Hi TTK, welcome back.

This is the 2nd occurrence of such a mindless behavior in a while -- the other being by someone that even stole my pics of my (low-cost!) 104 rep to post them on the Paneristi forum!

I presume that you as a dealer are not supposed to reveal a buyer's name... but this is a special occasion indeed, something that could prove harmful to our whole community (if any)... so please just consider if you can share your suspect with the moderators.

Thanks,

sss

Watchmeister Newbie

Watchmeister

Posted
Posted

Asshat, really nothing else to say. :angry: Actually, I am curious whether Neil is going to just leave it alone or let the mods know. Then again, why would he tell us if he does tell the mods. ;)

fletch512 Newbie

fletch512

Posted
Posted (edited)

That's a real Pam 90. The date font is the same as the real one, or at least different from any rep I've seen. Also, the "Power Reserve" is in the correct location. The reps have "Power Reserve" too close to the 5 o'clock hash mark. The crown looks right for this model. More pictures of original here. Neil, if you sell this rep with the correct date wheel, please let me know how to get one.

Edited by fletch512

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up