cib0rgman Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Can someone tell me which one is the correct bracelet number for a 1665 White Dial thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevethebest Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Can someone tell me which one is the correct bracelet number for a 1665 White Dial thanks I think 93150 solid link plus 585 end links... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Any 93150 would be correct. Depending on the story of the watch...could be with 585 or 501b ... Usualy old watches have been serviced and bracelets/end links can have been changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazarini Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Steph is right no real rule with ends i saw a few gens with 580s also. IMHO 585s would be ideal but not a must in any case. Laz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolex001 Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 9315 with PP divers extension on Mark 00, 0. Endlinks integrated 285/385 later 9315 with Pateted divers extension on the Mark I sometimes - same EL's. 9315 with Patented extension and same EL's (mostly 385) on Mark II but also already with 993150 93150 with Patented extension and 585 endlinks found mostly on Mark II-III 93150 without Patented stamp and 585 endlinks found in all Mark IV Sometimes, 580's were used, 501b's don't fit genuine 1665's - sometimes they fit the flat case used on early models but it's questionable. If you don't want to shell out Thousands - you should get a 93150 and a set of 585 or 580. Talkinga bout modern versions - bracelet with the lined Fliplock clasp already will be cheapest... depending on condition. SEL and Rolex sports model = fake. Except Yachtmaster and post 2007 models. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 9315 with PP divers extension on Mark 00, 0. Endlinks integrated 285/385 later 9315 with Pateted divers extension on the Mark I sometimes - same EL's. 9315 with Patented extension and same EL's (mostly 385) on Mark II but also already with 993150 93150 with Patented extension and 585 endlinks found mostly on Mark II-III 93150 without Patented stamp and 585 endlinks found in all Mark IV Sometimes, 580's were used, 501b's don't fit genuine 1665's - sometimes they fit the flat case used on early models but it's questionable. If you don't want to shell out Thousands - you should get a 93150 and a set of 585 or 580. Talkinga bout modern versions - bracelet with the lined Fliplock clasp already will be cheapest... depending on condition. SEL and Rolex sports model = fake. Except Yachtmaster and post 2007 models. Could you be a litlle more precise please ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazarini Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Haha now there u go... i just love answers like this, damn its good to be here Laz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadtorrent Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Wow. If you can find a better answer on a gen forum...odds are good it's from a member here. Way to go Rolex001. Now if you know nothing like me, you'll stick on your spare Casio plastic strap and call it a day being happy in the bliss of ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJo35 Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Wow. If you can find a better answer on a gen forum...odds are good it's from a member here. Way to go Rolex001. Now if you know nothing like me, you'll stick on your spare Casio plastic strap and call it a day being happy in the bliss of ignorance. Hahaha, that bliss of ignorance will also save you a lot of $$$ ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 9315 with PP divers extension on Mark 00, 0. Endlinks integrated 285/385 later 9315 with Pateted divers extension on the Mark I sometimes - same EL's. 9315 with Patented extension and same EL's (mostly 385) on Mark II but also already with 993150 93150 with Patented extension and 585 endlinks found mostly on Mark II-III 93150 without Patented stamp and 585 endlinks found in all Mark IV Sometimes, 580's were used, 501b's don't fit genuine 1665's - sometimes they fit the flat case used on early models but it's questionable. Bingo. But I do not think the Rolex factory ever (officially) fitted 580s on 1665s (any version). These would most likely have been installed as service replacements or by an AD or an owner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolex001 Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Thanks guys... my observation was that 580's do indeed fit, and as I said sometimes (thin case 1665) even the 501b's - but I really think this has to do with the poor quality of the Rolex endlinks, they are never consistently shaped... Best to go with a set of brand new ones, they will fit 100%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cib0rgman Posted November 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Thanks for the answer. Good to know all that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.