I have seven fully-modded Rolex reps from Joe.
I have posted close-up pics of all of them, and I think they look quite spectacular. So do a number of other folks who made very nice comments about them (this includes some of the same people bashing him in this thread.)
I look at the pictures of Panerai 153's DRSD and wonder how it could look so messed up compared to what Joe says he sent him.
Where are all the other pictures from other folks with messed-up RBJ watches. Please come forward and share them with the board.
Panerai 153 seemed so happy with this watch when he wrote about it a few months back...what happened to set this off?
I thought the pics of his new vintage lume-job looked so awesome that it inspired me to send my 1680 and 1665 back to Joe to be relumed. Obviously, if you take the time to look at the lume with a magnifier it will be imperfect. A magnifier-perfect lume line or dot can not be painted by even the steadiest of hands (even under the influence of B-blocker's.) Replace RBJ's fingers with a "DaVinci" robot, then maybe.
I too would like to see The Zigmeister's lume under the same high-power magnification and contrast lighting.
If ever I didn't like something Joe did, I would let him know and he would make it right (i.e. pay me back or fix the problem.) When he does an experiment (i.e. new lume technique or custom molded brevet crown, etc.) and you aren't happy with the result, why not just tell him and give him the chance to make it right?
One time, he installed an experimental pearl dot for a vintage insert and I thought it looked way-off. He didn't charge me.
He charges an hourly rate like any contractor I have ever come across (i.e. plumber, electrician, hi-fi techs, etc.) To me, it was worth the price since his quality has been very good and I too don't have the time or skills to do this type of work.
In short, these photos do not represent any of the end products I have ever received from RBJ.