sneed12

I've seen loads of rotors with that mistake.

That's not even a little bit true... Basically it's a second calendar mechanism that turns in 29.5 days (the length of a lunar month) instead of 31. The details vary depending on the movement you look at.

Been messing with a custom build--want to do an ETA movement in a Seiko diver case with aftermarket dial, and use GMT bits from a rep GMT Master II. We all know that the GMT wheel on the modded 2836 isn't standardized by any means, I've seen many different designs. The one I want to use has the "jump hour" feature. I did some digging in my drawer of spare hands and didn't find any that fit. 2893 hands are too small (no surprise) and the rep GMT hands I have are all too big. Also, a DG3804 hand was too big. However, oddly enough, a 7750 hour hand fit perfectly. I looked it up and the 7750 hour hand has a 2.00mm hole. Here's the weird part: the DG3804 supposedly also uses a 2.00mm hole for the GMT hand. What gives? I know that many of the rep 2836 GMT movements used a 210 hole, so I assumed that the DG was the same and that's why it was too big... Does anyone know I'd the DG movement sometimes uses different sizes? If so, does anyone know what hole size I will get if I order a raffles tile GMT hand for a DG?

It's a clone, and that's an excellent pic. 100% tells are clearly visible.

Mine says hi

We agreed to fight a duel to the death by PM, but in the end he decided to let me live so I guess we're all friends again

I cannot even begin to process the levels of stupid in your post. 1) No [censored], you were referring to you and not me with the 5-10 seconds thing. But it seems eminently reasonable to think that if it takes YOU 5-10 seconds to respond to a PM, it probably doesn't take me a very different amount of time. 2) You said "why not?" implying that since it only takes 5-10 seconds, it wasn't a big deal. There is an implication there that someone should be willing to give up their 5-10 seconds. While I don't think it's unreasonable, at the same time you have absolutely no right to expect that of someone else. 3) It's a bit hypocritical to be spouting off about how being polite to people makes their day a bit nicer, and then be rude to someone who's challenging your opinion. I contribute to this forum by sharing my knowledge, experience, experiments and enthusiasm. You whine about how people who don't pay attention to you hurt your feelings. I try very hard to respond to PMs, especially from people who are asking for help with a project, but the fact is that every time I post a build thread I get inundated with PMs asking if I would be willing to sell the watch. Sometimes I don't have 10 seconds x 30 people to reply "No, if it were for sale I would have posted a for sale thread" and sometimes I just don't want to. You have absolutely no right to a response when you send a PM, so quit whining about "lack of manners" when someone ignores you.

Sometimes I check my messages at work, and before I get a chance to reply I get interrupted and then I forget. Sometimes the PM is asking a very specific question and I have to dig a bit before I can find the answer, and it takes a while and I forget. Sometimes the message is just insufferably stupid and I don't want to reply. Sometimes I get a couple of dozen PMs in a day and I don't have time to respond to every one. What difference does it make? What right do you have to demand ten seconds of my time if I don't have the time to give? Believe it or not, there are many more important things in my life than this forum. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

Well I'll be honest--I ignore more than a few PMs. I get quite a lot of them. Does it really hurt your feelings that much?

It's worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Considering it's been for sale for 6 months, it seems that the market does indeed think it's a bit pricey.

There was a white dial and hands set for a 16520 for sale here like, yesterday I think http://www.rwgforum.net/topic/145287-fs-gen-rolex-16520-zenith-daytona-mk-iv-dial-hands-tritium/

If you're in CONUS, I'd be happy to open it up for you and take a look inside. I will tell you though, it's not worth anything near $1100. Maybe a tenth of that.

Looks like a 7750 to me. Subdial spacing looks off because the subdials themselves are too small. Nope. The 7750 has sec@9 in its regular configuration. It takes a transfer plate to move the seconds output to 6. On the plus side, the bezel profile looks nice and flat compared to many of the modern sec@6 reps.

No Yep Yep! Shouldn't have a problem selling it.

Again, no. There's no need to modify the "rest" of the movement. If the transfer plate was fully jeweled, it would be fine.

I think I'd say "some" rather than "most" but yes, generally you can swap

RBJ just popped back up again on RepGeek

The BP version of the watch that will be coming out soon will have a more correct case shape" is far different from saying "looks way to fake" common courtesy goes a long way

Your girlfriend looks "way to fake" Didn't your mother ever teach you that if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all? This rep is miles better than the Sub-C used to be, has pretty good rehaut engraving finally (the rehaut engraving on these was off for years) and the color on the dial and insert is pretty good. No, it's not the best rep in the universe but it's pretty darn good. Also, the BP maker Sub-C doesn't yet come in blue. Stop being such a rude little sod and you might learn something.

The cartel 5513 and 1680 cases I've seen have a thin nylon gasket that goes between the crystal and the retaining ring. If you leave it out the ring is too loose, but if you try to use it the ring won't fit. Also it slides off/up when you try to install the retaining ring and is just generally a huge pain in the ass.

I guess I should include that from the other thread, makes more sense here: Bottom sides are nearly identical All bezel parts--bezels have the same style of construction (gen parts on bottom) However, rep bezel retaining ring has larger ID than gen bezel retaining ring. Will not work with gen-spec crystal gasket, it falls right off.

I just did a gen bezel build for another member, and he graciously said I could post some comparison photos I took. Naturally while I had the gen part in my hands I wanted to see which rep part would be the best. The other member bought the case I had my CHS movement installed in, so I needed a new case. I bought a BP GMT IIc and this is the bezel it came with (gen on left) as you can see, the fonts are much too thin. I looked around a bit and decided to try the Parnis bezels from eBay. The fonts look quite good compared to gen, much better than the stock BP insert. Shape of triangles pretty close Zeros are close, but not quite right The color on the platinum in the gen bezel inserts is warmer/more brown than the paint I've been using. I'm going to start looking for different paint. Also, while it's glittery, you can't see any flakes in the gen finish. The glittery metallic flakes in the platinum paint I use are too big. But what the hey, it doesn't take very long, so I painted the Parnis insert and set about rebuilding my watch. I'm using the BP factory crystal here instead of gen, the gen crystal does not work well with the BP factory bezel and gasket (it's gen style but not gen spec sized). The AR on the BP factory cyclops is better than nothing but not anywhere near gen. My gen crystal with AR'ed cyclops is now in my BP blue Sub-C. Bezel insert after paint scraped off My watch on right, watch with gen bezel on left

Yeah, I don't clip I use a dremel and sand them off too but yes they have to be removed or they catch on stuff.

It's me thread posted

There was recently a gen bezel assembly (first I'd ever seen) for sale on VRF for 300-some odd Euros. panerai153 became the new lucky owner. He posted a thread (http://www.rwgforum.net/topic/156850-gmt-iic-ceramic-bezelinsert-swap-more-photos/) asking how to install the bezel assembly on his watch, and I pointed out it wasn't possible with the case he was trying to use. We got to talking and he asked me to sell him my GMT IIc case and install his movement/dial/hands, gen crystal with AR'ed cyclops, and gen bezel assembly. I was eager to see a gen bezel assembly in person so I agreed. panerai153's old watch on the left, my watch w/ donor case on the right. Gen bezel in the back. When you take the gen bezel apart here's what's there Compare to the torn down rep case (my rep is what we were calling the Sead superlumed last year, now we've learned it comes from the BP factory). As far as I know, this is the only rep GMT IIc with gen-style bezel construction. Every other GMT IIc case I've ever seen has a press-in crystal. Side-by-side of bezels, note the thin numbers on the rep bezel insert (there will be a second thread with gen/rep comparos) Bottom sides are nearly identical All bezel parts--bezels have the same style of construction (gen parts on bottom) HOWEVER--inside diameter of rep retaining ring is TOO BIG. This is the problem I ran into before when I first tried to install a gen crystal in my watch. You can mount a gen crystal on the case using a gen-spec crystal gasket, but when you try to install the rep bezel over it, the rep bezel is too big. It falls right off. I kludged it before by using the rep gasket with the gen crystal, but it didn't hold very well. Gen crystal w/ gen-spec gasket installed: Rep retaining ring installed. Notice how there's a gap at 6 o'clock (you can see between the ring and the gasket)? If I were to turn the watch over the retaining ring would fall right off (it's not supposed to do that, obviously). But the gen bezel retaining ring is designed for a gasket of this size, so using the gen parts gives a nice tight fit. The gen bezel works with this case. Having confirmed that it will work, I install the movement so that I can ensure the crystal is in the correct position and then I install the retaining ring. This step was a gigantic pain in the ass. I did it at least a dozen times. If you don't get it right, when you install the bezel itself the triangle doesn't line up to the 12. The ring kept slipping/rotating as I pressed it, so it would start lined up but be slightly off when it was pressed down. I bet Rolex installs the entire bezel assembly as a unit, which would make this much easier, but I was deathly afraid to press on the ceramic insert for fear that I would crack it so I did it this way. Finally I got it and installed the gen bezel. It looks amazing. Makes me wish I'd bought the bezel assembly. I'll be posting a second thread in a moment about what I'm doing with my watch and rep parts. Interestingly, the bezel feels just like the rep bezels--there's a tiny bit of play when you click it over. I tried adjusting it but it's just the way the gen spring is. Don't get me wrong, it's not loose or anything, it stays put and clicks over with authority, but there's a tiny bit of wiggle. Makes me think of all the folks who have tried to mod their reps to not be that way! Congratulations to panerai153, who is I believe the first person ever to own a GMT IIc rep with a gen bezel assembly.