I'm no expert on 1655. But there are some truths to what many have said here. Firstly, there are more than 1 variance of the 1655, mainly 1 with mercedes second hand and another with normal straight second hand. The mini markers are Supposed to touch the rehaut, so its surprising that the gen in Josh's photo doesn't. Also, those mini markers are more rectangular in shape rather than square. Its again interesting to note the difference in the gen watch from Josh's pic. Is it even possible the pple at the factory placed the wrong dial back into the gen by mistake?? Lastly, the fonts on the rep are quite well done, however there are differences in the T swiss T (spacing) as well as the Rolex font difference and spacing for the II. The first I should commence under the D in Date. And it seems that the bezel fonts are not right as well esp the 4 with the flat top and the 2s... but that is quite minor.
Sorry if i made a wrong comparison but i can't help but point out these after looking at many photos and closeups of the gen.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/207673/message/1278318241/FS-+FULL+PACKAGE+Rolex+Explorer+1655+Orange+Hand+%2B%2B%2B+FRECCIONE