Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Brian

Member
  • Posts

    135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Brian

  1. ouch . . . is that the old Demsey with the Ford gt avatar ?? how's your brand new one run down the street? or fly . . . 8^) Hey Gunn . . . how's your avatar of old doin"? B
  2. Brian

    Wow !

    thanks alot you parisian pug . . . I finally get back home and you bite me ???? Eat $#!+ & bite me you pugly piece of . . . PUG . . . your not that burnt out on france anything, even fries, are ya ??? it's Brian . . . long agao & far away, and about the time when rwg1 went Xmass crazy & . . . a couple NEW webs sprung up . . . unless you are so burnt out out on french toast & french fries & dying for some REAL maple surup . . . or English tea . . . and Norika . . . you can't even take a tease about all the off the wall not too awful strange watches you've shown me for a lotta years ??? and the ones that I've asked some other old timers about, and actually recommended you ?? OOOOOw . . . Goochenbrau, I honestly don't give half a rat's ass about your sexual persuasions, but, go cruise some where else . . . I've never been in to little boys, and REAALY don't get off on little limp [censored] little boys even watching it on TV . . . I'd rather watch commercials . . . even bad commercials . . . Hey TTK . . . Neil . . . sorry I've been tryin to keep pace with my teenage kid and try & to keep interested in his $#it & what he's into & actually wants his old man playin along . . . That's my FIRST priority . . . fore ever . . . What's new & hot to buy from you?? Mannnnnn . . . . I've been a rwg er . . . since you've all been tryin to be . . . . DUTCHY . . . you above all people are gettin on my case ???? Floris . . . it's me, Brian . . . you gonna bite me in my A$$ too ???? cjeff . . . yes real guys have a penis . . . you must have a limp little PuttPutt pencil [censored] . . . no wonder girls laugh hysterically at you when you ask them their name . . . jtb . . . thanks alot . . . been there at rwg1 since long be 4 what's his name flaked out . . . and he was drafted and ran away for what ever reasons he had . . . appreciate you remembering all the old rwg'ers & lord clive . . . you still need to send me the addy where I can get those handlebars installed on my truck . . . I just can't see them fittin on my vette . . . bjoh er B wow . . . paintball people sure have a . . . . lot above rep watch people . . . . cept maybe some old buggers, and some old friends . . . hey, can any of younewbees still talk to rbj ???? or is he as fed up & disgusted with you all as I'm getting . . . My other post was a blast at what I remembered about the "best Sub" crap ???? Anybody remember nobody . . . and sorry, I musta missed jetmid by a red hair . . . excuse me if I caused any conflict . . . I'm definitely sure no one or nobody ever did that be 4 wow, that's what I get for geting in to what my son is, and actually thought when I made my way back things would be half normal . . . shoulda known as soon as I saw the christmas motif . . . WTF some things never change . . . bjoh
  3. Brian

    Wow !

    It was in a magazine, and it was made by Rolex. It was mostly black, and had this black ring around the face of the watch, and said something about submarines. And they even put the price on the watch and said it was 1000 somethings & 300 m, probablt for marks. Is there a fake one of these? And, if there is, who has the best one. I mean one that looks so real, if I go into a jewelry store or pawn shop, they'll think it's real?? And I REALLY want one. I know fake watches are dirt cheap, but if it looks really good, I'd pay $50 or $60 for it . . . maybe even $75 if it's waterproof. But, I would want to check it out, and if I wear it for a week or two & if I don't like it, I want to be able to send it back & get my money back. Do you all know anybody who has one of these ???? I mean, I WILL pay even $75 for it, as long as I can get my $$ back if I don't like it . . . C'mon . . . if this is a for real rep watch site, this should be real easy for you all to take your time & do some research & find this for me . . . I mean . . . Who has the best Sub ???????? 8^) B
  4. wow, which girls do I call first ??? This is really wierd . . . I can't open a topic in a new window again . . . There's not even a menu when I rite click . . . With all the really wierd $#!+ that went on when rwg1 started to crash . . . I just figured something odd was happening to here & RWI too . . . and when a few wacked out people just had to antagonize the paneristi and post reps on a gen site, that maybe someone decided just to kill any chance of copy/paste to try and take care of that problem . . . but these are the only webs where this happens to me . . . guess I'll try TRC & WT & see if it happens there too . . . Oh . . . and what sucks up more $$$ than even rep watches . . . other than tanfoglio . . . PAINTBALL !!!!! I've bought cars that cost me less than MY setup . . . let alone my kids . . . I've bought NEW cars that don't cost as much . . . to put down . . . and to play . . . B
  5. No guys, Same old Firefox 1.5 browser. Had the same problem over at RWI. Unless something went wacko with just these two sites, neither will let me open a thread in a new window. It's a real pain in the a$$ to have to keep clicking back & back & back . . . I'll double check all the settings on my end . . . don't really remember any setting that would disable that feature though . . . or why it would . . . OK, now that's REALLY strange . . . today I CAN open things in a new window . . .on both . . . Just checked RWI too . . . ???? bad electricity ???? Maybe the sites were trying to back at me for not hanging around very much lately, but I do have a good reason . . . or, well, I have an expensive reason . . . I found, er, got pushed into something that is even more addicting, and WAY more expensive than rep watches . . . Have to tell ya all about it some time soon. B
  6. you all too ??? NO . . . I've been on the web too long to have to click back & back & back & back . . . . rite click & open in a new window . . . . after a long time & too much $$$$ into another hobbit . . . er . . . habit . . . . er . . . hobbies . . . . rwg . . . da dark side . . . pulled this crap, & sorry, I would of pitched a REAL big [censored] about that if I could afford to support both those . . . coff . . . coff . . . coff . . . spfffffft . . . sorry, fur ball . . . hobbies . . . . Sorry I haven't been around for a bit, but who the FiretrUCK decided to disable/screw with opening new windows here & there to follow a thread???? If both places have been taken over by aol losers . . . . never mind, I have a real life . . . expensive way more than rep watches, but real . . . & I'm gonna miss this crowd, and old friends, but . . . that's what I get, I guess, for stayin' away for too long . . . wow, fire up one of the old puters, and who was that guy with the original replica-watches-group website ???? maybe I can still rite click over there . . . . B
  7. Yea . . . poor old Chuck U. Farley . . . bad management decision ???? and if BIG OIL dropped prices to 75¢ . . . a gallon they'ed ONLY make 2 BILLION a quarter . . . how many companies would die/kill . . . to make that profit a YEAR ????? like the companies who build the cars & trucks that suck up the gas . . . that MAKE those profits ????? oooops . . . what was I thinkin' . . . Dubya and the Exterminator with a shotgun . . . . ARE big oil . . . & Haliburton . . . guess all us common folks are just Fu¢$ed again . . . not enough $$$$ and no common ¢s 8^( B
  8. Oh yea, it IS a watch forum . . . Boy reading that title, I sure wasn't expecting that . . . 8^) B
  9. As one of the lead developers on the development team to re-vamp the Rolex GMT master, Charles Ulysses Farley noted that when the combination of the second, minute and hour hands came together and lined up with the GMT hand, even though that was red, it was next to impossible to tell the time in the set GMT. In a limited number of the early releases, he produced the new GMT II with a curved GMT hand that would still point to the correct GMT time, but could be distinguished even when the stacked combination hands occured. After a number of these early GMT IIs were actually shipped out to a small number of ADs, it was officially unveiled at a watch convention in Geneva. The reaction of the industry and master watchmakers was one of sheer disbelief and ridicule. Upon returning to their corporate headquarters, the board held an emergency meeting, and immediately fired poor ole Chuck U. 8^) B
  10. Minimum bid $350 w/no reserve ?? Buy now for $1500 ?? SCAM !!!!!!! That or the U.S. government is selling Rollies to make up some $$$$ on the deficit . . . B
  11. Good one. That ranks right up there with Nanuq's smashing the Rollie & tossing it off the boat. BTW . . . yea, you're fired . . . 8^) B
  12. ABSOLUTELY !!!!! Post of the month. End game. Move on to August. But guys . . . How dull and boring would your life be without us ??? 8^) B
  13. The second hand is kinda hiding it, but does it really say Seanaster on the face ????? http://www.trustytime.com/index.php?main_p...products_id=742 B
  14. OK . . . I'm just drop dead FN stupid . . . I believe in "New & Improved" AND when anyone says it is PERFECT . . . I BELIEVE !!!! I BELIEVE !!!! PLEASE !!! Let me buy it. B
  15. OK . . . so who has the best Sub ?? The Sandwich Factory on Market St. moron! Oh come on people . . . shouldn't call it perfect ???? People may join here or the other forums who are new to reps, but I seriously doubt they are new to buying stuff. I'd even bet that everyone here, new or not has seen commercials on TV, heard them on the radio, read them in newspapers and in magazines. What about that favorite cleaner you've been using for years, or soap, shampoo, the beer you're drinking? Or even the brand of whipcream you use . . . ok, never mind about the whipcream . . . some newbie marketing genius for brand A comes up with a new bottle design, new colors & puts "New and Improved" on it? Do you really think it's new & improved? I think what the hell kind of junk were you selling me all those years! Yea, right, new and improved . . . I do agree with swdivad that 1:1 means case, and a step further, in that it will accept genuine parts w/o mods, like a MBW . . . but I would take the extra step and ask the dealer to be sure, or post the question to the board. And cray . . . "The problem is for the newbie who doesn't know the flaws and just wants a rep. Seems misleading to that person, probably 95% of buyers, to use the terminology that way." Buy any watch from our dealers here and you're not going to get scammed for quality or price, and that is exactly what these forums intended to do. Yea, maybe with some real reading and research, not just jumping to the dealer's section a person could find a better, more accurate rep . . . maybe, but still shouldn't be disapointed or feel ripped off about their watch. "Perfect" is every bit as subjective as "best." Don't believe me ?? OK, guys, what is the "perfect" woman ?? Girls, what is the "perfect" guy ?? Hell with reps . . . what is the "perfect" watch?? "Perfect" CD to play on a first date?? The "perfect" car?? And you can substitue "ultimate" or best" for perfect in any of those. How about real life marketing ?? No offense Beemer fanatics, but . . . "BMW The ultimate driving machine." Sorry not to me . . . This is getting too anal for even a forum full of replica watch freaks and fanatics that obsess over the wrong font in a line on a watch that you need to magnify 4 times to even read . . . JMHO . . . but really . . . B
  16. Yea, just tried it & got the same. Silix-prime is normal, but I know silixwatch is on a completely different server/ISP. It almost looks like an admin logon that you would use when you update/upload your site. Shoot 'em off an email and ask. B
  17. The font is all wrong on the numbers, and it should say "no" m, not 00m. I'd send that dial back and get a more correct one. 8^) B
  18. Agree 100% with this reply. I know a number of old time RWG1 members have their opinions of Elliott, and he doesn't seem to be overly welcome here. I was not affected by him at that time, have read his explanation of what he was dealing with at the time, am not into Pams, don't need his straps, and have a totally neutral opinion of him. That said, cwai02 is correct. The threads I've read over at RWI about site rankings, hits, etc., have all been started by Elliot. I have no idea why he so gleefully posted them, and replied in every one of them that the same people at RWI are at RWG2 and TRC and WT. That I don't see any "competition" between the boards, and personally don't think being "more popular" or higher ranked is necessarily a good thing either. The replies that I remember picking up on his theme seem to be coming from . . . can't really say newbies, but . . . names I don't readily recognize. That forum was started by old RWGers the same as this with the same intent, to have some place for us all to go if/when RWG1 crashed. I really hope there is no us vs. them mentality at ANY of the boards . . . us IS them! . . . and I would be very disapointed to find out otherwise. B
  19. OK . . . May 12 . . . Don't do that to me, you made me think it was Monday! "Indeed, and all those who think the guy porking her is lucky, she's a no sex before marriage type. Like the old saying goes, no matter how beautiful a woman is, there's a guy somewhere that's fed up with her [censored]." LOVE IT PUG !! And yea, I have a short list! 8^) B
  20. Hey Admin team! Congratulations for working so hard to bring me everything I want in a forum! And the Dark Side theme you use is really . . . ooooops . . . wrong forum . . . never mind. 8^) Great place you all put together Ken. THIS RWG is done right and taken care of right. Great mood, great atmosphere, and a great bunch of people running it & frequenting it. You all did a helluva job! B
  21. Too many people with WAY too much time on their hands . . . 8^) B
  22. My avatar is kid appropriate . . . even though it is an obscenely cheap watch . . . While I do have my views on the matter in general, as you can see by my avatar, a no nudity on an avatar rule wouldn't bother me either. I would hope that common sense prevails, and as TTK suggested, the membership itself should know what is inappropriate for their av or sig without any "new rule' being implemented. B
  23. OK, I read a handfull of pages, posted some thoughts . . . read another handfull of pages . . . and have some more . . . not too awful different, but, some more. I pretty much agree with overboosted. As I said, I've been and been part of setting up internet usage policies before, and if an employee wants to browse the net from work, then do so, following that policy, or risk the consequences. No policy I've ever seen will fire an employee for a first time violation. Obviously, the members here have seen the avatars, and would know if they violate company policy. It's THEIR responsibility, NOT anyone elses. If it violates YOUR companies policy, TURN THE AVATARS OFF. JMHO, but if you're barking about that, you're just plain lazy and don't want to go thru the extra step for your own convenience. I can also fully understand where people are coming from when they mention their kids. I kinda have the same reply to that about turning the avatars off when your kids are reading it with you. Having a son myself, who has been on the net as long as I have, here's some advice/experience to share with you to REALLY watch for. He's in to his computer games and (now) PS2 games. There's tons of sites out that have all kinds of cheat codes for the games. Too many of the sites absolutely KNOW that kids of all ages hit their site. They'll pop up & behind 8, 10 or more pages, and at least half have stuff on them that makes ANYTHING you might see here seem like Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood. That's what to watch for. Nudity, erotica, porn . . . doesn't bother, or really even phase me any more. If I want to I'll look, if not, I won't. Other then a wow, is she hot, or a she's not . . . In 99/00 got in with a crowd who got into hacking the pay porn sites. It was really cool at first, breaking in & checking them out. After about 40 or 50, they all had pretty much the same crap from the same handfull of "wholesalers" on the web. After about 100 or so, it was rare to spend any time on even a newly cracked site, unless something looked really different. After a couple hundred, it just got boring. Word lists run thru GE, spoof browsers, cookie spoofs . . . still have all the lists, and even now, 5/6 years later, every once in a while, I'll start down a list, and after I still get into 10 or 15 sites with the same stuff I used way back then, get bored, close up the programs, and find some other trouble to get into . . . like rep watches . . . I'd really rather be with a real lady in jeans and a sweatshirt, reasonably attractive, decent personality, taking a stroll, or sitting somewhere having a conversation, seeing if we get along and can put up with each other's [censored] for more than 5 or 10 minutes then wasting time sitting in front of the puter or TV watching a porn flick . . . although my dear sweet wifey might question that statement . . . I know I won't change anyone's mind, but there ARE options for anyone who may be job worried or offended by some avatar or sig they might come across here. I really don't feel that there is even a problem that needs to be dealt with, because the answer is already in place. B Oh yea, and Lord Clive . . . loved your av since the first time I saw it . . . but never really thought it pornographic . . . interesting, handy, inovative, and wondered if it was patented yet . . . but not pornographic. 8^)
  24. Wow, sorry to hear that Eddie. Reading thru the post though, it does sound like you were set up. What kind of an IDIOT would put replica anything on the package ?? If it wasn't intentional, then they must have a replica brain. And WHY would ANYONE: "The member has left all corresponding emails inside the package. ---details of all REPLICA DEALING TRACED BACK TO THE MEMBER, ME, OTHER SELLERS SITES, ETC" THAT dumb and they DON'T have a brain. That's the part that particularly bothered me, and why it seems like it was done on purpose to get you nailed. They took the time and effort to print out all that stuff and send it with the watch? Why? There is NO reason to do that, nothing to do with the problem or solution. It would take quite a lot of . . . something . . . to convince me otherwise. Get even, have your drop shipper get some piece of crap Sub rep & send it off to them. Write on the package "Hey nameless one, Here's that bootleg Rolex you paid me for. It's so good it should even fool a jewler! Enjoy! Cousin Joe. 8^) B
  25. Hey Chris, Gonna miss your posts around the boards, but taking care of your real life problems always comes first. May they be solved quickly and favorably for you. "See' you again soon. B
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up