Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

llsteve80

Member
  • Posts

    669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by llsteve80

  1. I dont see anything wrong with it, you are a reputable member of the forum, and I trust that your opinions were unbiased. In fact, I see this as a great way to get honest information out about new arrivals faster. If we have to wait until someone pays for it, it might be somebody who does not really know what they are doing, or is uninformed about gen/rep comparison.

    If you or a few others were to receive it for free for the purposes of writing a review, I think that is ok.

    Perhaps as a group, we should vote on whose "sponsored" reviews count instead of if it is ok? Maybe there should be a select few who are approved to write up official reviews for the sake of the forum, members selected by the memebers.

    For my vote, I would say By-tor and you, pugwash.

    Add-on: few mins later

    Perhaps, to keep the checks and balances in place, an auction thread can be started for the watch, with the proceed going straight to RWG. That way everyone benifits, whether they read the review or not, and the reviewer cannot be accused of being biased.

  2. Appraised at 6200! Pfft! I like the part where they say the pics were taken before the watch was taken to the jeweler, so now the bezel is turned back where it belongs.

    Item number: 190193126565

  3. The Venus/Lemania movements have symmetrical (not asymmetrical) pushers. I agree that the dial is not this watch's best feature, but the watch looks nice & that Venus movement is smooth, silky and a self-winder like the Valjoux used in gens or DWs. Not a bad piece for the price.

    But, the 7750 has symmetrical pushers on the movement, but DW did squeeze it into a case with asymetrical pushers, so I suppose it is possible.

    I guess no matter what, its not 100% unless you go with all gen parts. DW and Phong (sp?) cases look the best, but I don't like the subdials with the numbers not touching the bevels like on the gen dials. They are always printed on the inside of the line. Pushers and subdials are what I look at for the 3 ft test myself.

  4. Looks fantastic!

    I'm 'sorta' done with my Franken 16014. I've still got to come up with a way to attach the dial to the movement (I bought dial feet from JB and will experiment on a throw away dial with some different epoxies). Right now, its just being held together with the movement clamps (a real PITA lining up the date window when putting it together this way!).

    You mentioned that you used a plastic movement spacer - have you considered a steel/brass one instead? I used one from a Yachtmaster rep that I no longer had any interest in and it worked great. The inner diameter is already correct for the ETA movement, so all I had to do was remove some material from the outside of the spacer until it fit the 16014 case. Bought some movement clamps and re-used the screws from the Yacht and it works great.

    I'll try to get some pics posted soon.

    Again, nicely done!

    SR

    I had some brass and steel ones for eta, but I cant find them..... Anyway, the watch is already 2 grams over gen weight which for SS is supposed to be 107 grams I guess, so thats good. I don't really like the plastic spacers, but oh well. They do trim down in 1/10th the time though.

    To get the dials on I use this glue that is somewhat like rubber cement, but when it's dry its almost as strong as super glue, but can be removed with a razor if you need to. It gets semi stick after about 2 minutes, then I am able to still move the dial around and get it perfect before it sets all the way. I put it on with a toothpick, I love the stuff, but it's messy so caution is key since I don't want any glue getting anywhere on the movement. It's called power poxy stix-on contact.

    Are you going to throw some teaser pics up here soon? Or just wait until you're finished?

    Thanks everyone for your comments, and a big thanks to everyone who helped me find parts and gave advice and help!

  5. it's almost impossible to say without the pic. Eta can be gold or nickel. We need some pics.

    That looks like a run of the mill scam site, but at least you got a watch....but ouch 529 USD?

    Why dont you just upload the pics to photobucket or something?

    Anyway, I hope you paid CC so you can cancel payment.

  6. Here's some pics.

    My buddy said forget the MOP for now until we can find a good one, and for a good price, so I put the one that came with the case on for now. The hands cleared the markers ( no bending...) and the datewheel lined up perfectly on the 1st try. Love when that happens.

    I have to trim the plastic spacer down a bit so that the case back sits flush, but other than that its ready to go. Just watching it to see that it's working correctly and that the dial isn't too tight against the movement so the date changes freely. Oh, and it changes at 12:00:01...good enough for me.

    As for the lug holes, I told him to explain that the band was replaced, thats all, but who will notice anyway? Rep owners and people who buy lots of used watches to sell or collect, thats it. The Zigmeister suggested, or mentioned that some have had success with silver solder in filling them in, but I'll try that on some junk cases I have. No MAPP gas on this baby!

    I tried for an hour to get the crown to screw down with the coronet straight up, but no luck. Once I build my nicotine levels back up, maybe I'll give it another shot.

    Oh, and BTW, 6MM crown right? Because I also have a 5.33 and I don't even know what those go on, mid-size and airkings maybe?

    I'm going to have to wear it for a few days to "test" it before I send it to him now :D

    P12610025.jpg

    P12601024.jpg

    P12600123.jpg

    P1260031.jpg

    P1260025.jpg

  7. Rolex did change the model numbers by adding a 1 to some of the case numbers. Case numbers now have six digits rather than five. For example, the 16233 became 116233. I suppose that all case parts will fit either case save for the bracelet. I really don't think that your watch will scream fake at all. As you say, most non informed watch people won't know the differences in the first place. Besides, you could simply say that you replaced your worn bracelet with the new design. BTW, I think that your watch is going to look great. I love the look of the diamond dial.

    As an aside, when you asked your watchmaker if he could install your parts in your Eta movement, did you say E-T-A or Eta? I can't imagine any comptent watchsmith who hasn't heard of Eta movements. Perhaps he just didn't want the job. If he really doesn't know of it, you should move on with all haste.

    Right, I forgot about the extra 1, oops. I think it looks good right now, its almost done and ready to go on my pals writs. I said "Eta" and they looked at me like I should explain further or something. HA.

    yeah, I've got a 16220 case that has holes, and a 16220 case that does not have holes. Just something Rolex did I guess. I'll check the series later. They both have bracelets on them and I'm kinda lazy to do it now. I think the holes case is an E series, and the no holes is A. I have to double check though.

    Take your time. A and E serials you mean? I forgot what the serial is on this case, and I am also too lazy to take the band off.

    IMHO, if you are going ton spend time, money and effort building a franken, do it as close as you can to the gen and try to use not only gen pieces but also match the age of them... you will finally have a balanced piece...

    Well, I'll put some pics up very soon, just have to take them.

  8. Maybe I should go meet him anyway and just smack the shi* out of him :lol:

    Thinking deviously, maybe I can go downtown and meet the guy and when I get the watch in hand call it out and threaten to call the cops and see if he just leaves without the watch. Then I get a free rep and nobody is going to get suckered into paying thousands for it. Ha!

  9. Hey, look for my thread on the DW newman that I bought. I got one for my friend too, but he doesn't like it so ill be putting it up for sale on here next week. The DW cases are the only ones with assymetrically placed pushers. They come in 2 versions, one with v72 and most accurate and the other with 7750 which has a little different subdial spacing.

    Just keep reading up on it before you make a decision

  10. No, it doesn't look "ok".

    It's an obvious replica. Stay away.

    Nice and blunt, yet you have a point :p Thanks

    Yeah, and in general in any type of buying situation like this, if the watch doesn't come with the box and papers, then you need to take measures to verify that the watch is genuine. I wouldn't buy a watch off of craigslist without cracking the caseback, inspecting the serial, etc..

    I do that anyway, if they say I cant peek inside I assume fake. Papers don't make me feel any better at all, I think that scammers will try to emphasize having papers to distract buyers from what could be obvious.

  11. I believe that the no spring bar hole case first appeared in 2002 and was a different case design from the previous model. The shape of the case was designed to better contour to the shape of the wrist. FYI, the last digit in your five digit case number would be "4" if the watch was shipped with white gold accessories. The "0" indicates that it was shipped as all SS.

    New style bracelets with solid end links will not fit the older "pin hole" cases due to the change in location of the pin holes.

    I have seen them fitted by using bent spring bars but the fit was imperfect. I would contact one of our collectors and ask if an old style "open end link" bracelet was available or, search for a genuine older style bracelet. Your watch will appear authentic and your patience will not be tried by trying to fit the newer style bracelet to the older case.

    I have the correct end pieces already, I just have them aside. It is a 16234 case, I just didn't have it near me anymore when I was typing and I figured everyone would take the 16200 as 162xx. My mistake. what I don't get is the no-holes and the holes case have the same ref# ? Or am I missing something here?

    As for it screaming fake from 20 miles away, I'm not sure. Most people don't know that much anyway. Most of them automatically assume fake anyway when they see a rolex.

  12. First question that comes to my mind is, does that bracelet fit the case? Is it the angle, or are the springbars not aligned with the lug holes?

    There was a case that just ended on eBay with no lug holes for $199. pretty good deal as those cases are a hard find.

    There is a process where the lug holes can be filled by welding, then sanded and polished. you can't even see the fill, but it is risky as you can damage the case by overheating with the weld. I don't recommend it unless you have some experience.

    Dang, see I told my buddy to wait and maybe a no holes case would show up. He doesn't understand that taking your time is better. Hence the problems I've had. It's hard to find no holes cases on the bay.

    I didn't install the springbars for the pics, thats all. I just wanted to give an idea of what it's going to look like.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up