panerai153 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 Switching to "Clean cut' solved the problem on this computer. my computerer at home running wndows 7 never had the "Split box" problem Arthur
MasterOfPuppets Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 It worked, but the website looks kinda weird now!
maxman Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 Extra $100 to the board if the problem remains on Demsey's computer... Touche Doc, touche. The last time I said this was to a cab driver In Brooklyn, I was going to the stadium. Get It
Demsey Posted December 16, 2009 Author Report Posted December 16, 2009 Has Doc's $100 cleared PayPal yet? Just askin'.
krpster Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 Switching to "Clean cut' solved the problem on this computer. Worked for mine too. Only thing still a bit wonky is the emoticons on the quick reply. If you expand them they cover the text box. No biggy though...just hide them while typing. Thanks! Edit: Never mind about the emoticons. After hiding and turning back on the text box shifts. All good.
Member X Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 Sweet, CleanCut solves the issue, even if it means getting used to a new layout again lol I might even try the LoFi option at work as it looks less 'non-work'!
Ronin Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 IE stands for Internet Exploder. Friends don't let friends use IE. (Except for the corporate folks who's IT departments are still using IE SIX 6) I have been rocking Firefox for years with the AdBlock+ and No Script extensions just like Freddy333. I might jump to Chrome when the Adblock+/NoScript plugins exist there.
offshore Posted December 17, 2009 Report Posted December 17, 2009 FWIW, an interesting discussion re various browsers here.- http://digihub.smh.com.au/node/177 O/S
AllergyDoc Posted December 17, 2009 Report Posted December 17, 2009 Keep posting tho'. This thread is as arcane as Doc's "Free" thread. He's got a six page lead. We could turn it into monster if we all pull together as a team. Well, if thread had anything worth talking about...
Demsey Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Posted December 18, 2009 Well, if thread had anything worth talking about... "my"
AllergyDoc Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 (edited) Well, if thread had anything worth talking about... "this" Chrome is not SPARTA!! friendly: it won't load RepGeek. FF does. Chrome doesn't seem much faster, if at all, to me. Edited December 18, 2009 by AllergyDoc
Demsey Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Posted December 18, 2009 In other news, I see you double posted your UPO thread at 1.1. Interesting that you got similar input on both threads. Some good advice all around. I'll be checking back at 1.1 tho'. I have Vegas odds it won't go three pages over there before some one works '[censored]' or 'cocksucker' into the thread.
AllergyDoc Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 John doesn't visit RWG 1.1 too often now...
dluddy Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 Chrome is not SPARTA!! friendly: it won't load RepGeek. FF does. Chrome doesn't seem much faster, if at all, to me. I use it exclusively and it works just fine on Geeks for me Doc Sounds like you have other issues
lanikai Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 Well to be impartial.. I just downloaded Chrome.. and am using it now.. went over to RG .. Chrome is working fine.. it actually is a little faster than firefox.. I'll keep both.. I'll try Chrome for a week .. I have a mobile broadband for my notebook.. and Chrome has increased the speed.. maybe "bachi" doc.. AC/Lani
AllergyDoc Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 I use it exclusively and it works just fine on Geeks for me Doc Sounds like you have other issues Some say I do. Here you go, Dems: 3 pages. Murry Christmus.
fakemaster Posted December 18, 2009 Report Posted December 18, 2009 (edited) C'mon Fakey. You're the 'one liner' king. You have enough field to work with. Me? I could burn up the entire Leisure section of the Times. Keep posting tho'. This thread is as arcane as Doc's "Free" thread. He's got a six page lead. We could turn it into monster if we all pull together as a team. LOL. Well since you asked ok. Still sucks though. Edited December 18, 2009 by fakemaster
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now