freddy333 Posted September 24, 2010 Report Posted September 24, 2010 Sapphire crystal Subs (modern models) are not my specialty, but it looks gen to me.
rosnik Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 IMO, dial is Gen, wile I need more pictures to seed
praetor Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 (edited) Rep? it looks as if the crown is too big & bezel teeth has the wrong shape (too short). looks so good tho :wub: Edited September 25, 2010 by praetor
gplracer Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 Looks gen to me. That is one two tone watch I would like to have. I have a family member that has one already.
freddy333 Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 Is the date off-center in the date window? Hard to tell without a good, clear full-frontal pic. If it is, then I would say the watch is likely a franken.
cougaree Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 The bezel insert doesn't look gen to me, which leads me to question whether the case is gen.
freddy333 Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 With the new pics, I am leaning towards franken. Gen case, rep dial.
Gadget Man Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Posted September 25, 2010 Ok, maybe a few more pics will help you all decide? Here you go, I have just taken these with my iPhone
FxrAndy Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 I am going for gen but with a question, is that a service replacement dial?
Dizzy Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 I see distortions in the end links.. might be the plating crown looks too big date looks off center... but the only thing that really stands out for me is the too thick crown. This is a nice watch and if its a rep, its a good one. We are just nit-picking here.
rosnik Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 seeing the crown correct position I seed Gen.
gplracer Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 I say it is either a gen or a BK WM9.
gplracer Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 (edited) BK, I have 24 reasons to think that! Edited September 25, 2010 by gplracer
Gadget Man Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Posted September 25, 2010 BK, I have 24 reasons to think that! lol Nice one gplracer OK, you got me lol it's a BK wm9 It was an 19 month wait but finally it's on my wrist
gplracer Posted September 25, 2010 Report Posted September 25, 2010 Gadget Man it is a very nice watch! Congrats!
highoeyazmuhudee Posted September 26, 2010 Report Posted September 26, 2010 that was a tough one, i was going to say "if its a replica, congratulations" looks outstanding
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now