Comparative Review - Rolex Explorer II 16570 - Gen Vs Rep (Warning: Many Pictures!)

31 posts in this topic

ID: 1   Posted · Report post

Having the privilege of owning both the gen and rep of this watch, this will be my first comparative review for 2012..I know that this comparison has been done to death by previous members but this is my take on the Rolex Explorer II 16570..

p1050226h.jpg

The white dial (aka “Polar”) is the gen whilst the black dial is the rep..

Before I start on the comparison, here are some measurements on this timepiece:

Case Size: Sports

Model: Explorer II

Reference: 16570

Movement: Rolex Caliber 3185

Date: Yes

Material: 903L grade Stainless Steel

Case (mm): 39.5

Thickness (mm): 12.2

Bezel (mm): 39

Crystal (mm): 30.5 Synthetic Sapphire

Bracelet Width (mm): 20

Clasp Width (mm): 16.5

Water Resistance: 330ft. / 100m.

Note: I am waiting on a digital caliper and will include the measurements of the rep soon.

Official Adverts from Rolex:

rolex16570blackad.jpg

rolexexplorer1997.jpg

Some background info:

The Explorer II (1655 “Orange-Hand) was introduced in 1971 as a supplement to the original Rolex Explorer, and with the current model 165

The Explorer II was designed for cave exploration, or any other sort of extended expeditions and the GMT hand was originally used to give the wearer an indication of day and night.

p1040577a.jpg

The red “GMT” hand used in conjunction with the 24 hr. markings on the bezel serve this purpose and indicating a second time-zone.

My Explorer II was purchased pre-owned from a gen forum in mid-2011, and mine is from the K Series that has drilled through lug holes (in the later Y series production run, Rolex switched to solid lugs without the hole visible from the outside of the lug). This dial is also equipped with Superluminova on its hour markers, which allows for better visibility in the dark.

p1040590a.jpg

This was my first modern Rolex I purchased and will always be treasured and a keeper in my watchbox. Having owned many other watches (gen & rep) with black dials, the white dial and understated bezel makes this watch an excellent choice to wear casually as well as with a suit. Having the Rolex caliber 3185 within the Explorer II help make the decision to purchase a lot simpler for me.

Here’s my complete Explorer family.

From Left to Right:

Explorer I 39mm 214270, Explorer I 36mm 14270, Explorer II 1655, Explorer II 16570 (White & Black)

p1050190z.jpg

Base watch (rep) was purchased from Stan (WBK) with a Swiss 2836-2 with modified GMT function. It had the ‘stick dial’ which was never produced for the Explorer II but have been documented for the GMT Master II 16710.

Upon receipt of the base watch, I noticed that the GMT hand was slipping so off it went to Spinmaster for service and resetting of the hands.

To get a more accurate dial, I PM-ed Angus (PureTime) to help me source the latest rep dial. He had been most helpful in tracking this for me and I am more grateful for that assistance.

Spin also helped me fit in the sourced dial and trimmed the Crown Guards to a more accurate look.

Total cost of the Rep (as of now): US$350

Cost of the Gen: US$3,350

Let’s start off the review with a frontal shot of the watches:

Gen:

p1050229q.jpg

Rep:

p1050228p.jpg

Visually it looks ok. Definitely passes the 6inch test (IMO) but on further inspection, date font seems alil thicker and cyclops magnification looks more than 2.5x.

Rehaut also looks alright..no wokky-ness here and also no engraving to worry about..

Lumeshot:

In Semi-dark room:

p1050283r.jpg

In Dark room:

p1050280q.jpg

Gen is on the left, Rep on the right. Both were exposed to the same amount of sunlight (abt 10 seconds) and taken in a semi-dark room.

I was quite pleasantly surprised by the lume on the rep dial. Lume on the hands definitely need to be redone.

Dial Font:

Gen:

p1050231e.jpg

Rep:

p1050230k.jpg

Font looks accurate and crisp. Coronot also looks spot-on.

Spacing and Font of “Swiss Made”:

Gen:

p1050233r.jpg

Rep:

p1050232z.jpg

Printing is crisp but font type is different from gen. Minute markers on the rep are also further away from the rehaut as compared to the gen.

Hour / Minute Hand:

Gen:

p1050251c.jpg

Rep:

p1050252j.jpg

Obvious difference in the size of the “Y” on the hour hand and lume width on both hands.

GMT Hand:

Gen:

p1050254je.jpg

Rep:

p1050256a.jpg

Color of the Red GMT hand seems to be the right shade but triangle on the rep hand looks alil smaller than the gen.

Stacking of Hands on Gen: Seconds, Minute, GMT, Hand

Stacking of Hands on Rep: Seconds, Minute, Hour, GMT

Crown / Crown Guard:

Gen:

p1050240a.jpg

Rep:

p1050241n.jpg

Crown is lower on the rep, due to the thickness of the movement. Rep is running on a Swiss 2836-2 modified GMT movement. Coronet is passable if you are not too fussy.

Gen:

p1050270.jpg

Rep:

p1050269i.jpg

Thickness of the rep Crown is an obvious flaw and threading on the tube is definitely better machined on the gen. Luckily both gen crowns/tubes can be quite easily sourced.

CGs on the rep has already been trimmed but due to lack of material, it looks more like Pointed CGs rather than the Flat top CGs. This is not so obvious when worn on the wrist.

Bezel Marker Font (Used "14" as example):

Gen:

p1050235q.jpg

Rep:

p1050234du.jpg

Font type again is slightly different. Application of black enamel paint on the gen bezel looks more refined whilst the rep looks crudely painted on.

Bezel Marker Placement (Used "12" as example) / Crystal Height & Bevel:

Gen:

p1050249d.jpg

Rep:

p1050250d.jpg

Placement of bezel marker is slightly closer to the ‘lip’ on the rep. As seen from the pics, this difference is very minute.

Height and Bevel looks quite spot-on.

Cyclops , Date Wheel (DW):

Gen:

p1050238p.jpg

Rep:

p1050236o.jpg

Cyclops is inaccurate and is most probably the culprit in the slightly larger magnification. DW on the rep is shifted towards the right whilst the DW on the gen is more centered. As mentioned earlier, date font is slightly thicker on the rep.

Caseback:

Gen:

p1050271i.jpg

Rep:

p1050272.jpg

‘Teeth’ on the rep is not as refined as the gen and seems to be slightly thicker than the gen.

SEL Fitment / Case Lugs:

Gen:

p1050247tz.jpg

Rep:

p1050248p.jpg

Gen wins hands-down in this department. However this can be easily resolved. Good news is the gen SEL bracelet can be fitted onto the rep.

Direction of brushings on the case lugs and SEL bracelet looks more prominent on the gen. Brushing with a green Scrub pad would help out the rep in this aspect.

Bracelet & Foldover Clasp:

Gen:

p1050258i.jpg

Rep:

p1050257b.jpg

Clasp looks visually 100% identical. However, you can see from the next few pics, the side profile that the rep is slightly thicker and longer than the gen.

This is also the case when comparing the small foldover clasp. Rep is slightly larger than the gen.

p1050261d.jpg

p1050262z.jpg

Rep on the left, Gen on the right

Clasp Inner Stamping - Engraving :

Gen:

p1050260w.jpg

Rep:

p1050259h.jpg

Gen is 78790A whilst rep is 93250. Stamping is not as crisp on the rep. Laser engraving on the rep is too deep.

Final Thoughts:

For a tenth of the price of the gen, the rep is definitely a watch that is a must in the watchbox. This model is also understated and not as widely recognizable as the Rolex Submariner.

I hope you enjoyed this as much as I enjoyed publishing this. :)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 2   Posted · Report post

Comprehensive review ! Make this a award winning sticky thread mod:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 3   Posted · Report post

Thank you! :euro:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 4   Posted · Report post

Thanks for the review!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 5   Posted · Report post

That was quite an enjoyable read! Thanks for taking the time to do this one! :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 6   Posted · Report post

Thanks for the comments guys! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 7   Posted · Report post

Good job. Thanks a bunch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 8   Posted · Report post

Thanks for sharing.

That really does look good.

Dropping the latest avaiable dial in it was a great idea.

Congrats on the awesome pair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 9   Posted · Report post

Great review. Very informative. I am very impressed with the rep. 1/10th the price - you cannot beat that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 10   Posted · Report post

Excellent work! :) I love reviews like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 11   Posted · Report post

thanks for the review!! Just what I wanted to see :)

i have a question

http://www.1-pc8838.com/0rlex00088-explorer-white-a2836-p-11662.html

is this what you ordered?? (lastest 39mm exp2)

From the pics Josh has, it seems lume on the hands are almost bright as lume on index.

However, from what you have, lume on the hands seems significantly weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 12   Posted · Report post

thanks for the review!! Just what I wanted to see :)

i have a question

http://www.1-pc8838....36-p-11662.html

is this what you ordered?? (lastest 39mm exp2)

From the pics Josh has, it seems lume on the hands are almost bright as lume on index.

However, from what you have, lume on the hands seems significantly weak.

Glad you read the review..as indicated, i got my Explorer II from Stan (or WBK)..He is a Trusted dealer on this forum (http://www.rwg.cc/forum/229-wbk-time/) and also the other sister rep forums, if i am correct..

I also purchased the dial from Angus (PureTime) and left the hands as is. Reluming the hands or getting a completely new set will most probably be in the list of mods for this watch..

But for a tenth of the price to the gen, I can live with these small inaccuracies.. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 13   Posted · Report post

This is the watch prior to any modding..you can see the 'stick' or 'error' dial in the watch..

On a matching Nato strap.

img0461lx.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 14   Posted · Report post

Glad you read the review..as indicated, i got my Explorer II from Stan (or WBK)..He is a Trusted dealer on this forum (http://www.rwg.cc/forum/229-wbk-time/) and also the other sister rep forums, if i am correct..

I also purchased the dial from Angus (PureTime) and left the hands as is. Reluming the hands or getting a completely new set will most probably be in the list of mods for this watch..

But for a tenth of the price to the gen, I can live with these small inaccuracies.. :)

I see, so the dial is from angus and all other parts are from WBK.

Thanks for kind explanation helped me a lot :)

Thumbs up for your reviews!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 15   Posted (edited) · Report post

This is the watch prior to any modding..you can see the 'stick' or 'error' dial in the watch..

On a matching Nato strap.

img0461lx.jpg

Thanks yet again. I hadn't noticed that about mine but you are, of course, right again.

I've noticed the "Rolex" on the 11 error dial to be not as white and a bit too wide but hadn't noticed the 11 as opposed to the ii...until now.

Edited by correctime

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 16   Posted · Report post

It's the little details that we all become so anal about right? lol :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 17   Posted · Report post

It's the little details that we all become so anal about right? lol :D

You can say that again! :D

Again, great read!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 18   Posted · Report post

*Updated*

Weight: Gen Vs Rep

16570weight.jpg

Surprisingly the Rep weighs about 10grams heavier than the Gen..Having said that, the Rep commands the same presence, if not more, than the Gen..It sits great on my wrist and i'm sure it would too on others.. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 19   Posted · Report post

Now thats a proper post , great effort thank you for putting the time in much appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 20   Posted · Report post

WOW! What an outstanding review. Well done. Thanks for putting this together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 21   Posted · Report post

This was amazing. From the entire house, I only like the this Explorer and the Milgauss.

Awesome side by side review though!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 22   Posted · Report post

Great guide, and the white one (gen), made me fall in love with this watch!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 23   Posted · Report post

Thanks for putting this together.

Made me want to get one for myself too. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 24   Posted · Report post

Wow. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ID: 25   Posted · Report post

Great review. Wonderful level of detail. Yes you can find flaws but stepping back you have to put together a heck of a rep I would happily wear if I owned - rare for a Rolex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now