Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Why do the trusted dealers say their gold plating is 5 mil thick?


Recommended Posts

http://www.trustytim...roducts_id=3425

This is clearly not the case.

Plating thicknesses for precious metal objects and related trade is regulated by specific rules that are administered by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. This can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Commercial practices Part 23 January 1999. Precious metals under F.T.C. regulations include gold, silver, and the platinum metals group. F.T.C. requirements for plating thickness are expressed in both microinches and microns (see chart B).

http://www.artisanplating.com/articles/platingthick.html

5 mil x 25.4 microns / 1 mil = 127 microns

The "thickest" gold plating standards set by the federal trade commission is called "heavy gold plate" which is 2.5 microns thick. If trusty's watches are 127 microns thick of x carats of gold, then they're 51 times thicker than the thickest gold plating standards set by the FTC...

At a very minimum, I think the trusted dealers should get their units of measurement right. Or they could just say "Hey, we don't actually know how thick it is, but we're told its thick!"

:p

Edited by david.the.marvelous
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest it is just marketing

they say lots of things like 1-1 and made with a genuine sample, there is no trading standards agency here, the ols and bold know what is belivable and what is not, yes truth an honesty would be nice but with experience you can make good purchaces and get what you ordered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thickness of 'gold' flashing/plating (or whatever term you prefer) on any given rep watch is dependent entirely on the intentions of the person who flashed that watch. There is little consistency & no real QC in the contraband world, so trying to define standards is an act of lunacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.trustytim...roducts_id=3425

This is clearly not the case.

Altho the "trusted dealers" have a proven track record of problem resolution they are still merchants selling contraband goods. Always keep an eye on that fact, and you'll understand more about your hobby.

Not everything they say in the ads is true, and you will come to learn what is hype and what is real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thickness of 'gold' flashing/plating (or whatever term you prefer) on any given rep watch is dependent entirely on the intentions of the person who flashed that watch. There is little consistency & no real QC in the contraband world, so trying to define standards is an act of lunacy.

I'm not sure what you mean. It sounds like you're saying the thickness of the gold plating is a function of the wearers intentions. This doesn't make sense, but maybe that's not what you were trying to say.

I understand that there is little consistancy in the rep world. Fair enough. However, the trusted dealers should at least have a couple of their reps analyzed. They could take in one of their reps with a "thick" plating finish and one with a "thin" and then report those findings on their website as the standard for thick and thin gold plating.

5 mils just sounds stupid and unrealistic.

Edited by david.the.marvelous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you mean. It sounds like you're saying the thickness of the gold plating is a function of the wearers intentions. This doesn't make sense, but maybe that's not what you were trying to say.

I understand that there is little consistancy in the rep world. Fair enough. However, the trusted dealers should at least have a couple of their reps analyzed. They could take in one of their reps with a "thick" plating finish and one with a "thin" and then report those findings on their website as the standard for thick and thin gold plating.

5 mils just sounds stupid and unrealistic.

Person who flashed the watch = Factory worker who performed the gold plating process, thus how well they were prepared to do their job ;)

As for the other boldened point, why should they? People are happy to either buy the product as described, or not. The dealers don't care if their terms are inaccurate, and they certainly don't care about the US legislature whIch you posted :lol: I'm not sure if you were making a joke that they should adhere to those standards, or if you naïvely believe they actually should, but at the end of the day, they are selling contraband, not discounted 'factory seconds'. The kind of standards you're describing apply to genuine watches only. Freddy has mentioned several times in the past that the gold plating on rep watches has never been brilliant, is prone to wearing off, and thus full gold colored and two tone reps are not recommended as day to day beaters, as they can apparently lose their finish quite quickly :pardon:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get plating that thick in semi rare metals like Chrome and satin. Its obvious the 5mil gold plating is not true. At the end of the day (with all due respect) we're dealing with crooks who are illegally selling counterfit goods. You should never trust them 100% with anything to say. We just have to accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I have always wondered about is how thick the coatings are. I know Gold Filled in the U.S. legally means that 1/20th of the metal is some form of gold (usually 10 or 14k). I always wondered what that implies for the thickness. Gold filled stuff can easily last 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person who flashed the watch = Factory worker who performed the gold plating process, thus how well they were prepared to do their job ;)

As for the other boldened point, why should they? People are happy to either buy the product as described, or not. The dealers don't care if their terms are inaccurate, and they certainly don't care about the US legislature whIch you posted :lol: I'm not sure if you were making a joke that they should adhere to those standards, or if you naïvely believe they actually should, but at the end of the day, they are selling contraband, not discounted 'factory seconds'. The kind of standards you're describing apply to genuine watches only. Freddy has mentioned several times in the past that the gold plating on rep watches has never been brilliant, is prone to wearing off, and thus full gold colored and two tone reps are not recommended as day to day beaters, as they can apparently lose their finish quite quickly :pardon:

I never once said that they should adhere to any standards set by any government :g: If not for standards of quality replica watches, what are we here for? Why do people like ByTor and everyone else take the time that they do to conduct quality reviews? To set standards for replica watches, yeah? ;)

The point that I am trying to make is that in order to improve their (the dealers) business model, and in order to sell more gold and two tone replicas, they could do what i recommended earlier. My guess is that of all the watches they sell, maybe 10-15% of them are gold plated or two tone. Because there are no standards at all for their gold plating, nobody wants to take the chance of shelling out 400 bucks to get a rep with shitting plating that wears off. If they were to correct this malfunction in their business model, and if they were to announce and advertise the appropriate measures that they were taking to correct this problem, it seems reasonable that their number of sales for their gold and two tone pieces would increase. Furthermore, if the sales of two tone watches and gold plated watches increased, it might fare pretty well for them in that gold plated watches, in general, are more expensive than steel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never once said that they should adhere to any standards set by any government :g: If not for standards of quality replica watches, what are we here for? Why do people like ByTor and everyone else take the time that they do to conduct quality reviews? To set standards for replica watches, yeah? ;)

The point that I am trying to make is that in order to improve their (the dealers) business model, and in order to sell more gold and two tone replicas, they could do what i recommended earlier. My guess is that of all the watches they sell, maybe 10-15% of them are gold plated or two tone. Because there are no standards at all for their gold plating, nobody wants to take the chance of shelling out 400 bucks to get a rep with shitting plating that wears off. If they were to correct this malfunction in their business model, and if they were to announce and advertise the appropriate measures that they were taking to correct this problem, it seems reasonable that their number of sales for their gold and two tone pieces would increase. Furthermore, if the sales of two tone watches and gold plated watches increased, it might fare pretty well for them in that gold plated watches, in general, are more expensive than steel.

Buddy.

Alot of bs goes on with these dealers and thats what the forums are here for,talk to each other,discuss whats bs and not,but frankly the real dealers in this game would rather that none of these forums existed,it would be better for business if we didnt. Small potatoes,and in their opinion,a handfull of know it alls. We really are not much when it comes to the counterfeit market.

Guys like By-Tor and others back in the day did reviews to promote discussion in our small community,but again,in the counterfeit watch trade as a whole,we are just a small annoyance that the dealers listed here try to combat,while pretending to be a friend. It is what it is,dont think that asking them to be honest to us really means much,it would hurt them more than help,really.

Edited by Dave123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never once said that they should adhere to any standards set by any government :g: If not for standards of quality replica watches, what are we here for? Why do people like ByTor and everyone else take the time that they do to conduct quality reviews? To set standards for replica watches, yeah? ;)

The point that I am trying to make is that in order to improve their (the dealers) business model, and in order to sell more gold and two tone replicas, they could do what i recommended earlier. My guess is that of all the watches they sell, maybe 10-15% of them are gold plated or two tone. Because there are no standards at all for their gold plating, nobody wants to take the chance of shelling out 400 bucks to get a rep with shitting plating that wears off. If they were to correct this malfunction in their business model, and if they were to announce and advertise the appropriate measures that they were taking to correct this problem, it seems reasonable that their number of sales for their gold and two tone pieces would increase. Furthermore, if the sales of two tone watches and gold plated watches increased, it might fare pretty well for them in that gold plated watches, in general, are more expensive than steel.

So why quote legislature if you don't want it applied? :g: Other than that, I can't add anything to what Dave has already said in response :pardon:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even on gen watches with gold plating, it tends to wear off quite quickly. I saw a bvlgari rep advertised recently as being brass rather than rose gold plated, and that seems like a better idea. Also some of the hublots seem to be gold ceramic rather than gold, which should wear well also.

I quite like the idea of a two tone rep, but will not be buying one soon due to these problems. Maybe my next gen will be a two tone Daytona, as they can't rep the case or the movement right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The two tone reps I've owned - doesn't matter if the sides of the links are plated or not - the real problem is the gold they use has some impurities in it which tend to come out after awhile, the tarnish, discoloration these watches develop is really something.

Sure I buff it out but it comes back again quickly.

The gen gold plated watches I own don't tarnish like these reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quoted federal regs to provide some perspective.

Anyway, I've dealt with some of these dealers for many years, and I have never once felt that they are out to f*ck people over.

Ahh, thanks for clarifying :good::drinks: We'll have to agree to disagree about the dealers though ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

http://www.trustytim...roducts_id=3425

This is clearly not the case.

http://www.artisanplating.com/articles/platingthick.html

5 mil x 25.4 microns / 1 mil = 127 microns

The "thickest" gold plating standards set by the federal trade commission is called "heavy gold plate" which is 2.5 microns thick. If trusty's watches are 127 microns thick of x carats of gold, then they're 51 times thicker than the thickest gold plating standards set by the FTC...

At a very minimum, I think the trusted dealers should get their units of measurement right. Or they could just say "Hey, we don't actually know how thick it is, but we're told its thick!"

blum.gif

Not entirely correct. 1 micron is 1/1000th of a millimeter, so, 5 microns would be 5/1000 of 1 mm. Gov't standard for "heavy" plating is 2,5 mictons and 5 microns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up