Curt941 Posted March 29, 2014 Report Posted March 29, 2014 http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-VINTAGE-ROLEX-DAYTONA-COSMOGRAPH-6263-SS-MEN-WRIST-WATCH-/171282800631?pt=Wristwatches&hash=item27e1401ff7 Condition : The watch every thing original except the case ( none original ) ! The band got some stretches and the watch got some minor hairlines scratches here there cause the age ! All chronograph function properly and set back to zero ! The movement clean tick strong keep excellent to excellent time ! All Bidder need to reviewed all pics as part of the description and ask all question if you like before you bid ! All Sell Final No Refund or Return .
panerai153 Posted March 30, 2014 Report Posted March 30, 2014 Looks like a DW bezel as well. I bet this one will be gone in a few hours. Too many non Rolex parts for EBay and the sheriffs on the Rolex Forum!! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
lhooq Posted March 30, 2014 Report Posted March 30, 2014 It's not just the case that's not original. I agree that the bezel is aftermarket; my guess is Yuki, rather than DW, due to the spacing of the '110' and the overall poor quality of the printing. I also have doubts about the movement. Take a look at the chronograph bridge: The engravings look off and the countersinking around the rubies is noticeably shallow. Now look at the balance bridge: I don't think Rolex ever used an Incabloc shock absorber on its Daytona movements (but please correct me if I'm mistaken). There's also a screw going through the middle of the coupling-clutch mount, which -as far as I know- you only see on non-Rolex Valjoux 72s. 1
ceejay Posted March 30, 2014 Report Posted March 30, 2014 If I am right Rolex moved to the KIF anti shock because incabloc we're insisting on manufacturers putting the word incabloc on the dial in the 70's Of course I am know to be wrong quite often, just ask my Mrs
janeto72 Posted March 30, 2014 Report Posted March 30, 2014 valjoux 72 movement modified to look like a 727.....I can tell you guys more....
alligoat Posted March 31, 2014 Report Posted March 31, 2014 I agree, the movement is not right. The chronograph pivoted detent bridge (the 'L' shaped bridge at 7-8 o'clock) is an early one w/ a screw in it- after the 6234, Rolex used the newer pivoted detent bridge w/o the screw. This may be what LHOOQ refers to as the coupling clutch mount.
lhooq Posted March 31, 2014 Report Posted March 31, 2014 I agree, the movement is not right. The chronograph pivoted detent bridge (the 'L' shaped bridge at 7-8 o'clock) is an early one w/ a screw in it- after the 6234, Rolex used the newer pivoted detent bridge w/o the screw. This may be what LHOOQ refers to as the coupling clutch mount. M, I think I need an illustrated glossary of movement parts! I referred to that chevron-shaped bridge as a mount, because the entire assembly shows up as "#8080 - Coupling clutch, mounted" on Valjoux 23/72 manuals: ceejay: Thanks for the info about Incabloc. I didn't know about the naming requirement.
alligoat Posted March 31, 2014 Report Posted March 31, 2014 Looks like the watch is gone now. Yep, M, we are talking about the same part. My terminology comes out of the 1949 Assembl-O-Graf Manual- whereas Valjoux does refer to it as the coupling clutch, mounted- the whole assembly.
droptopman Posted March 31, 2014 Report Posted March 31, 2014 Item removed.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Godwin Posted December 24, 2020 Report Posted December 24, 2020 Hi I'm looking for a good black bezel for my watch 6263 ? Thanks
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now