ubiquitous Posted June 27, 2008 Author Report Posted June 27, 2008 Thanks all, for the very kind words So, day 2 with this bad boy, and it's starting to feel a little more natural on the wrist. Still somewhat awkward, though; the weight always reminds me it's there! To help answer some questions... Has anyone laid the question to rest as to whether the movement magic is accomplished by mere gears or are they jeweled? Not sure how this movement will fare under the scrutiny of ZZ! Hopefully, this will pass the test! May I ask if all links had been removed. will it fit for my 6.12' wrist? Raymond- It's difficult to say for sure. My wrist is 6.75" and I only have one link on (all the rest have been removed). I think the proper fit is going to depend on the shape of your wrist as the long case and lug overhang will play an important role as to whether the watch feels comfortable. As we all know, the RO and ROO bracelets aren't the most conforming; the rubber strap as dani mentioned may indeed be a better solution! QUESTION: ....will the deployant clasp open with 2 pusher from the side or just snap open? Theo- The clasp on this one is tension set and snaps open once the flip lock is opened. As for the flaws... Just glancing at my watch, here's what I see: -The date surround in the aperture is silver, not black (though for me, it's not a huge deal). -The date/cyclops is a little too close to the inner bezel/rehaut -No lume on the markers -No metal surrounds on the markers (though this is a pretty subtle one). -Crown is a bit high on the profile Otherwise things look pretty decent (though I'm sure I've missed a few). Thanks again for the comments, guys! All very much appreciated! Cheers, Randy
Mickey Padge Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 Great pictures and info, thanks for sharing
robertk Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 Boy, I like big watches, but this one is a monster. But it is a beauty. wear it well.
turboGUATE Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 Thanks for all the input Randy, keep it coming as you enjoy your watch. Since everyone mentioned the rubber strap, do you happen to have one for yours? It would be great if you could post some pics of your watch with rubber. Cheers!
ubiquitous Posted June 27, 2008 Author Report Posted June 27, 2008 Thanks for all the input Randy, keep it coming as you enjoy your watch. Since everyone mentioned the rubber strap, do you happen to have one for yours? It would be great if you could post some pics of your watch with rubber. Cheers! Unfortunately, no rubber strap for me. If I decide to keep this thing, I may look into picking one up, or maybe getting a leather or croc. For now... The bracelet will have to do Boy, I like big watches, but this one is a monster. It is indeed! Here is a small comparo between a few others in my collection... Even though the ROO has a dimension of 42mm (just 2mm bigger than the Daytona and the same diameter of the Natuilus), it makes them both seem much smaller. This is one beefy case! I've since discovered that this watch fits on my right wrist better as it's slightly larger...
sulimblim Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 Congrats, it looks fantastic on your wrist. Take care of your new baby and have fun !
Katerchen Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 Just wanted to drop a line... Congrats Randy on this purchase Stunning watch as far as your pics crop up!! What would you say about overall-finish of the piece? Close to mbw/mbk?? Am close to pull the trigger on that one Wear it well! George
godzilla Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 great photos. Thanks ubiquitous. Really tempting. I hope they fix the date background soon.
b16a2 Posted June 28, 2008 Report Posted June 28, 2008 There is a discussion on another thread, they did make the AP ROO with this date surround apparently, so it looks like this is even more accurate than first thought
flex Posted June 28, 2008 Report Posted June 28, 2008 not sure if it is the light or something...i think the bracelte look more 'brushed' or solid on the gen..
triosLescano Posted June 28, 2008 Report Posted June 28, 2008 Had the surprise of my Royal Oak Offshore w/ seconds@12:00 (25721ST) knocking at the front door today. It's been a long while since I actually ordered a rep watch simply for the sake of wearing out of the box (the last one was a year ago- My much loved Nautilus); I was quite anxious with anticipation. Tore into the packaging and discovered a large brick was inside; a big, stainless steel brick. Quizzically, I withdrew this large, massive chunk of metal from the parcel... Initial thoughts- The watch is gorgeous. Great finishing, nice, crisp lines and the dial, in spite of all it's faults, is very high quality with great color, nice detail and very nice overall finish. The bracelet and case are top notch, very solid and confident. Gave the bracelet a quick sizing, rinsed the case with a wipe down and a couple of swings to wind and set the time. Checked the chronograph functions... Everything loooks good, sooooo.... Pop the clasp to slip it on and... It's a bit clumsy and awkward on my 6.5" wrist *sigh* For someone who is used to 40mm Daytonas and a much slimmer profile 42mm Nautilus (same diameter as the ROO, but far less bulky), this watch feels a bit... Out of place on me. It seems to attract a lot attention so far, which is something else that I'm not quite used to. My wife convinced me to give this one a week or two of wear before making the decision of keeping or selling; I have to say that after just a few hours, it's starting to feel a little more natural If it weren't for the size (mostly the thickness) of the case and bracelet links, I'd be all over this. I suppose that my answer lies with the more conservative and lower profile 25860ST Chronograph- Still, this ROO is fun (and I'm especially grateful that my price to feel this one out was a very small fraction of the gen). Overall, on the merits of this watch, I think it's a very ncie piece. If you're looking for all out perfection, you may just want to skip this one and buy a gen However, if you want a nice ROO at a great price, this may be worth a look for those of you interested (and hopefully with thicker wrists than mine ). All the best! R Great post, thanks. An inquiry. I have a MBW/MBK AP old version second running at 9. It is a watch whit a great defect (second running at 9) but very fine and detailed in case, dial ecc.... In your opinion is this AP detailed good as MBW ? I am tempted to buy it, but have some doubts about the level of finiture......
emuozz Posted June 29, 2008 Report Posted June 29, 2008 The watch looks absolutely great, congratulations on your new watch . It gives the idea of being a lot larger than 42 mm. Well if I recall correctly you own a closed back MBK 15202, so would you take a comparison shot as the one that you take with your other watches. Btw, is every one sure than the color silver on the thing around the date it
Guest carlsbadrolex Posted June 29, 2008 Report Posted June 29, 2008 Well if I recall correctly you own a closed back MBK 15202, so would you take a comparison shot as the one that you take with your other watches. I dont think thats gonna be possible!
coolfire Posted June 29, 2008 Report Posted June 29, 2008 What an exceptional watch, Ubi! Wear it well, my friend...
ubiquitous Posted July 2, 2008 Author Report Posted July 2, 2008 Hey gang, Sorry for the late reply; it has been a busy past few days! So... I'm just catching up... The watch looks absolutely great, congratulations on your new watch . It gives the idea of being a lot larger than 42 mm. Well if I recall correctly you own a closed back MBK 15202, so would you take a comparison shot as the one that you take with your other watches. Btw, is every one sure than the color silver on the thing around the date it
emuozz Posted July 2, 2008 Report Posted July 2, 2008 (edited) Hey gang, Sorry for the late reply; it has been a busy past few days! So... I'm just catching up... Unfortunately, I cannot. Both the 15202 (Jumbo) and 25721 (ROO) have been transitioned to new homes However, you are correct; this watch is huge. Has the look and feel of being much, much larger than a 42mm watch! Very top heavy! Well now I’m jealous of the new owners then Edited July 2, 2008 by emuozz
georgegrasser Posted July 2, 2008 Report Posted July 2, 2008 Really big..............and HEAVY. You could actually kill someone with this watch!
Guest carlsbadrolex Posted July 2, 2008 Report Posted July 2, 2008 Really big..............and HEAVY. You could actually kill someone with this watch! I guess if you wanted too... But I would rather impress the panties off of some of these hot 25 year olds hanging out around my neighborhood! GOD I LOVE SUMMER!!!
cue003 Posted July 2, 2008 Report Posted July 2, 2008 Thanks all, for the very kind words So, day 2 with this bad boy, and it's starting to feel a little more natural on the wrist. Still somewhat awkward, though; the weight always reminds me it's there! To help answer some questions... Not sure how this movement will fare under the scrutiny of ZZ! Hopefully, this will pass the test! Raymond- It's difficult to say for sure. My wrist is 6.75" and I only have one link on (all the rest have been removed). I think the proper fit is going to depend on the shape of your wrist as the long case and lug overhang will play an important role as to whether the watch feels comfortable. As we all know, the RO and ROO bracelets aren't the most conforming; the rubber strap as dani mentioned may indeed be a better solution! Theo- The clasp on this one is tension set and snaps open once the flip lock is opened. As for the flaws... Just glancing at my watch, here's what I see: -The date surround in the aperture is silver, not black (though for me, it's not a huge deal). -The date/cyclops is a little too close to the inner bezel/rehaut -No lume on the markers -No metal surrounds on the markers (though this is a pretty subtle one). -Crown is a bit high on the profile Otherwise things look pretty decent (though I'm sure I've missed a few). Thanks again for the comments, guys! All very much appreciated! Cheers, Randy Awesome watch there Randy. I see many with the black version and wondering if the other color (the white) is a "better" choice. Is the date surround in the aperture correct on the white faced version? Is the black face overall more accurate than the white face? Thanks.
eunomians Posted July 12, 2008 Report Posted July 12, 2008 Ubi, I just scooped one up to try it out--can't wait for it to arrive. I went for black (of course). I also went for the rubber since it might fit my 6.85" wrist a little better??? Cheers from your ol' pal
Guest Sql_pl Posted July 12, 2008 Report Posted July 12, 2008 I also feel that black themes on rubber will be my first choice. SS bezel of course.
eunomians Posted July 12, 2008 Report Posted July 12, 2008 I also feel that black themes on rubber will be my first choice. SS bezel of course. I went for the rubber bezel. If I like this watch (and it fits well), I'll get the SS bezel version also and slap on a leather strap Best regards
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now