Martyd3 Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Hmmmm... Compare to gen dial, hands, etc. The differences are there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I got an email from J&W for a similar Tudor for $950 today. Appeared to have a different bezel insert- which BTW, was still incorrect- Phong never seems to get inserts right- always has a bad pearl. His watches are expensive, especially when you take into account they are frankens- built from a combination of genuine and aftermarket parts. But I doubt you could pick up a correct Tudor for under $2K these days. I don't know if the 9411 should have a T-125 with a cyclops, but that would be an easy fix and a correct insert could be had for under $100 if you look around. It ain't perfect, but if it's what you really really want.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 7021 and 9411 should have the Cyclope 125; the 7016, 7928 94010 have the Tropic 19. That said, the T-19 is a good replacement on the 7021 and 9411/0 for those who don't want a cyclops... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolex001 Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Why not consider my 7928? It's probably a 100 times better... Gen old Triplock, gen vintage bezel insert with Tritium pearl, gen hands, serviced Tudor movement, genuine 78360 bracelet, Viet casing with correct engravings and stampings in the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Yes; 7928 is also a good choice, but still very traditional. At any rate, Tudors are pretty easy to build... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris5264 Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Why not consider my 7928? Nice!!! One of these Tudor vintages is still on my list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Love those Tudor-powered 7928s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 7922 would be the ultimate for me... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitestripes Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Damn, wish there were good not-phong-super-expensive reps of tudors... the perfect sub that will never get called out! this is so beautiful, but i'd want a date in it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 @whitestrpies: My Tudors are all MBW based Granted, I don't have the Tudor engraving on the caseback, I'm not too bothered by it; watches generally stay on my wrist Cheers! R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dani Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 why are jewelryandwatch.com so expensive 1650 for a case set Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 why are jewelryandwatch.com so expensive 1650 for a case set Because enough people are willing to pay that much. I am not excusing their (& others') excessive pricing, I am just answering your question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.