Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

FxrAndy

Diamond Member
  • Posts

    13,070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by FxrAndy

  1. Like 25-295 for a sapphire sub crystal 25-127 1680 crystal ??-703 for modern and service triplock crowns What about insert part numbers
  2. Where are you in the world? I now know what you mean about the screw orientations ie the slot is not the same. I would say the best option if you like the watch is option 3 if you have a modder near you or a watch smith that you trust that will work on reps
  3. If it stayed at that price I would get it just for the movement but I think it will shoot up a bit
  4. I had to mod one of my collets to take the 1.65mm bar u was working with just to get that far. Turning the valve was not the big problem but making the spring. Also getting orings that small is not easy I had one in my spares pack. If any one knows of a supply of the orings I will be great full
  5. Duck may be coming as well but at the most it will be 3 of us
  6. I just love that one Nanuq, it just proves that vintage does not have to be messed up like some people think, it just needs to be worn.
  7. I would say that the problem here is that the balance is over banked, looking at the position of the spars in the balance wheel and comparing thin to the ones i have here non sit with the spras in that position. Over banking, what its it, The roller Jewel 3 has through cause of shock been able to slip out of the safety fingers and land behind one, so imagine the anchor in the same position as above but the roler jewel now sat where the number one is, thus the balance is trying to go left and anchor needs to go right to relese the next toothbut they cant, it is a simple mater of removing the balance and refiting it and then it should tic away nicely. This could easily be caused by rough handling in the post even is well padded On the screw orientation that you mentioned i would also be interested to se the diffentence in the QC pics and that watch you got
  8. Yep UPOs and Gen POs are very hard to size, I use 2 tools one to move the pin and another to get it all the way out
  9. Thank for your donation to RWG Even though you have still not appologised the truth is now in the public eye and i belive that this matter can now be deamed as closed.
  10. In case you cant find the donation area here it is http://www.rwg.cc/donate/goal-8-summer-loving/ and €50 is $61
  11. Did you read post 10? what does it say in post 10? Does it say i am holding onto your watch? Does it say and show with films that i am posting your watch and give the registered post number? Indicating that your watch was put in the post back to you on Saterday
  12. Use the forum donation area and read the thread in particular post 10
  13. Ah thanks looks like I missed that one
  14. A bit of a difference there for sure but the rep is only 10% of the gen
  15. The only thing I would do to the rep is fit an ETA date wheel. That to me is the only way I would have known if you had not said the rep was on the left Scary indeed
  16. God what a nice movement. Any one know where I could buy just the movements?
  17. It is not that shiny in reality as i never polished it after turning the end off
  18. Back on topic Well Finhs has gone very quiet but it has not gone un-noticed that he has not made any donation and does not even have the manners to say thank you for the postal information.
  19. Thank you a great resorce and some drool worthy photos in there
  20. The miyota is a better movement and has better QC but is generaly more expencive I have had DGs that have been running for 7 years with out attention though
  21. Nice watch, i dont think we have ever had a a good rep gen comparison with the PO even though there are loads of posts and it is a very popular watch
  22. Nope i dont think i will be making any more,
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up