Star69

Domi is the best - at least with Chronos cheers, Frank

or NDT = 100% fake

thanks Andy - finally put this one together cheers, Frank

thanks a lot !

Taka is MIA - or back ? not an option atm anyway - but he knew how good AR coating had to look like Fine DDs coating looks like from an optician for glasses - not what i would prefer on a watch im sucker for the blue hue Domi now offers AR - sadly didn't have the chance to see it in RL yet .... cheers, Frank

any chance to do a side pic to compare the crown hight ? thx Frank

my 2 €z : 1 : its not the thickness - this case part is just polished different than the rep case - a little polishing by hand makes the rep case lock exactly like the gen - not only on 1675 - on all vintage Rolex reps. 2 : not fixable - only if you pull some stunts - which is not worth is esp if you are keeping the cheapo Asian movement 3 : same for all vintage Rolex reps CG shape on top and button are different - some modders use just a Dremel with a cutting wheel = case ruined 4: this curve is changed by Rolex over the year all the time - alone the 16610 has at least two case that are completely different in this area all in all why so much trouble ? we all know with a little tweaking the Josh case will look nice - but never really fool anyone - the old Noob GMT II middle case was way better or the TC 16610 is also way better - maybe someday the make some new vintage cases .... cheers, Frank

so after reading RAs other post - the (s)thickness is the same cheers, Frank

looking good

hey i actually like that - too bad Dior is written on it - that's a no go cheers, Frank

a friendly word of advice - wear and enjoy the watch as it is - sooner or later there will be a new / better version of this watch out. then the money you spent to make the watch 1% more accurate is thrown out of the window. the are a lot of "modders" and "watchsmiths" at these boards the offer all kind of mods and services - read a lot - make you own decision if this is really necessary i would send my watch only out if something is broken cheers, Frank

Frogmariner today cheers, Frank

cheers, Frank

does is really matter ? how would you measure the middle case ? the thickness of the lugs ? you would need a NOS gen case to compare. and there are too many variants over the year to cover them all. the Josh case is good enough - at least for me. i don't see the problem in the case thickness - i see the problems in the CG area. cheers, Frank

bottom to glass (w/o cyclop)

very entertaining boys i just took my 1675 out of the trash and i think RA is right about the case - there are a few more case variants in the GMT line - here is the case thickness of a few watches: (ass to top without mag) - GMT Master (16750) Plexi - 1,30 cm - GMT Master II (16760) - 1,28 cm - GMT Master (16700) - 1,18 cm - GMT Master II (16710) - 1,20 cm - GMT Master (1675) Plexi - 1,30 cm - GMT Master (1675 thin case) Plexi - 1,27 cm - GMT Master (6542) Plexi - 1,27 cm - Submariner Date (16610) - 1,28 cm cheers, Frank

i have one - send me a PM

im talking about the space betw. crown and case - the red line see the second watch to show it better ... cheers, Frank

that was a little provocative even the WM9 V1 is still a nice watch - the only thing i don't understand are the prices - i thought the prices go down to a lower/normal level now that these watches are wildly available again ....

sorry - outdated (the crown position is shitty - too close to the case = the watch look off 2me)

am i missing something ?! why are so many Subs for sale atm ? and why are the prices to freaking high ?! even for the shitty WM9 V3s ?! don't i get for $500 a nicer brand new watch from TC ? cheers, Frank

V1 - TC wins, V3 TC wins - but V2 - if you don't want to drop a gen movement they are equal. the more gen parts you drop on the better they get. cheers, Frank

just keep the watch as it is save the money and get a 2nd watch. cheers, Frank