sssurfer

Another masterpiece for my Worst Pam Ever collection. Thanks, Mig!

Now I see why you think so many men are masturbators. Surely I was unaware about the grounds of your way of thinking, but it does not change that way. I too think that when one wants to masturbate then he goes to porn sites, not here. Exactly for that reason, differently from you, I think that noone browsed repaustria's thread, or is looking at the avatars, with one hand engaged the way you suggested. You seem to mistake the people here with your previous customers. But your fight not to let porno 'contaminate' this environment gets more under a personal light now (I wonder what circumstances made you leave that occupation out), and as a personal thing I'll leave it to you with my respect. @craytonic: I may agree with you, but my point is that freedom should be SELF-constrained, not by rules or moderators or other members, as long as everybody already own the power to switch avatars off if they wants to. @Chronus and Mahler: thanks for your help, mates. This topic is becoming larger than expected.

Personally, I just see it as freedom. Even in such a little thing as a rep forum.

And Repaustria's post surely did not contain porn (neither nudity, as well), still you came out with speaking about masturbation. I can re-phrase my sentence with 'porn' in place of 'nudity' if you prefer, it does not change a bit about its meaning: ' This is the 2nd time that you make a compulsory association between seeing porn and masturbation. ' Surely I don't have (and I don't care to have). Personally, I feel no amusement at the image of a man who does not consider that other men can look at nudity or porn and they still do not think about masturbation. A man who uses charges of masturbation as his next-level argument to those he does not agree with. Btw, it seems as you even think that masturbating is a worse thing than trying to drive others to conform their behavior to someone else's idea of decence and morality.

Edge, we are going to miss you so much. Best wishes on your issues, whatever they are.

Yes, it is, as long as one can simply switch avatars off but he rather prefers to pontificate others about decence and morality in a community. And here is how I spell it for you. This is the 2nd time (the first is here) that you make a compulsory association between seeing nudity and masturbation. This goes a long way in telling of your mental attitude. As Highflyingclive said,

Good to know. Thanks for the advice Mark, they fooled me. But, if you scroll their page down, they actually say Super-Luminova.

One 028A here.

Otto Frei

"LASIK@Home is committed to bringing clear vision to those less fortunate. We encourage you to donate your old eyeglasses to your local school, Lions Club, or other charity." They should just say "your old eyes" in place of "your old eyeglasses". Ok, maybe this is an old thread, but it is simply irresistible.

Ooops, sorry, I did not pay attention. Maybe this other one is better?

PAM163: btw: eagle eye!

Original and enlightening research, Mahler! Thanks for sharing and for making us rep nuts feeling better.

Congrats on your gorgeous watch and your wife's good taste! Just, why cannot you unscrew the CG?

My most heartfelt congratulations on the new titanium-look crowns too! I too made a try several months ago about titanium-look on Lello's crowns, so I can figure how difficult it must have been to find a solution. Your solution looks gorgeous! Great work!

Well done Chris, congrats! Now please let's all us stop kidding. Please Chris show us something more of your avatar girl. I'm afraid I've got the hot about her. (...yes, I luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuvvvvvve asian sweeeeeeeeetiiieeeessssssssssss.................)

PM sent

Well, thanks!

Thanks, Mig. What a shame on us Italian people. Not only because he's trying to foolish buyers, but also because he's doing it in such a risible way. Certifidato di garanzia. A 2002 watch with a H dial. The crown seems not so bad in some pics, though -- I wonder if he replaced it. Sto considerando se sputtanarlo (I am thinking about calling him out).

Uhm... I suppose Birdman had first-hand (to say so) experience about it... hardly a need to google it Apart from jokes, have my best wishes for your prompt and full recovery, Birdman.

Very interesting, thanks for sharing! I still prefer diving without a bathyscaphe, though

Yes, the watch definitely has moisture (humidity) inside and when the temperature of the crystal becomes lower than the temperature inside the case then moisture condensates to the fog that you saw attached to the crystal. It's unlikely that moisture came from the crystal -- it just condensates there because the crystal is more exposed to temperature changes than other watch parts (e.g., like your car windshield). Most likely points for moisture income are the caseback and the crown tube -- maybe defective or missing o-rings. You have two goals now: 1 - To remove the moisture that is already inside. Any of the ways suggested before is good, but please consider that fog disappearing does not mean that moisture has gone -- just that it de-condensated again. As you already experienced, fog may come back again as soon as temperature changes. In order to be sure that moisture has definitely gone, place a small piece of ice on the crystal, then wait a little, then clean: if the crystal is not foggy, moisture has gone. Also consider that placing the watch, caseback opened, in a warm place (e.g. a black or see-through box under a lamp) along with a bag of silica gel dessiccant may speed up the departure of moisture. 2 - To prevent moisture from re-entering into the case. Replace the back and crown o-rings. Only if moisture re-enters again, then replace the teflon o-ring where the crystal sits. Best wishes!

That was supposed to be included in #1 along with because the watch is beautiful etc It must have been my poor English...