Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

ubiquitous

Platinum Member
  • Posts

    13,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Everything posted by ubiquitous

  1. You'll need either an El Primero 400 (31j only) or PHC3019 (look specifically for the 31j). Both movements are the same; the 3019 comes in both 31j and 17j flavors. I suggest getting the 31j however- Manufacturers are only allowed to count functional jewels; that said, the additional 14 jewels added must account for added value and improved function (ziggy can probably weigh in here as he has serviced both). Of course... The obligatory photos... Ebel 134, aka Zenith El Primero 400: Zenith PHC3019: Gen dials: Finished product.... When shopping movements, don't forget to factor in cost to service... Roughly $500 or so.
  2. Bezel is fixed position. It's not supposed to turn at all.
  3. For the steel 6265 bezels, those can be pressed on with a press. For the acrylic 6263 bezels, those have to be trimmed slightly to fit. I've done a number of these... Here's an old EE I did over a year ago...
  4. Try giving it a little shot of oil... That might help loosen it up... Though, if the link is binding up, it could be debris that's preventing it from moving... Dirt, or metal shavings... Or maybe a hole in the link that hasn't been cleanly cut. If you feel comfortable with removing the bracelet (sorry, I have no idea how much effort is involved on a TAG Link), that will probably reveal the problem... Best of luck!
  5. Can't seem to get this one off my wrist...
  6. One of the best things for one to read while waiting for their watch(es)!
  7. Hi George... Not wanting to hijack Euno's thread, I had better start one of my own on this one...
  8. Yes... You'd have to swap out the date overlay, and add new hands (90/150/25) in order to make this work (new stem should be provided with the movement). Physically, the ETA is similar to the 21j Asian; the stem lines up in the same position, so retrofitting into any watch originally with a 21j shouldn't be a problem. You will have to cut the feet off the dial, however... Or, you can ask your dealer to sell you an ETA specific dial if they have one and are willing to sell you parts.
  9. If you get new hands and a stem you can always swap in an ETA 2836... Which hacks. But for pure 1:1 change out, the Miyota Ziggy suggets is the easiest...
  10. Great write up and very well done! I especially like the way Mr. Cousteau is (pictorially) represented in the review Very cute! Pictures are well done and the watch looks great!
  11. Well, the mod-7750 for the secs@6:00 Daytona carries the 12 hour and 30 min counters slightly above axis of the center on the dial (across 9:00 and 3:00). This means that those subdials sit closer towards 12:00 and make it aesthetically incorrect for this watch (along with the issue of subdial spacing between the three registers). Not to mention that the additional plate for the extra gears on the movement adds height to the profile and hance would make this watch too thick/chunky for a proper 25860; this is the same issue with the Daytona rep... Too thick of a case as a result of the mod-7750 movement... The gen 25860 uses a cal 2385 which is an AP modified F. Piguet 1185.
  12. If it's just the stem and set screw that have come loose, then it's a really simple fix. Just a matter of retightening the set screw, which is easily accessible with the caseback removed. One word of caution- Don't go too tight on the screw. You'll want to turn it just enough to meet resistance. Overtightening can be very bad... Best of luck! R
  13. Man... If I could have only one PAM, it would be this one! Great watch... Knowing that it's been modded by ziggy is just icing on the cake...
  14. If the crown turns the hands in the winding position (and the watch does not wind), it's usually a simple matter of the stem not engaging because the set screw has come loose. This has happened to 2 of my Swiss 6497's... Not a huge deal, but a bit annoying...
  15. Heh... I've got the Royal Oak Jumbo... Nauti Jumbo on the way... Looks like I'll have to get the new Overseas to keep up with you guys!
  16. K- I managed to figure out a way to prevent this with my MBK Royal Oak Jumbo- I had the problem of either the clasp projecting out and creating a sharp bend on the 12:00 side of the bracelet, or some binding on the 6:00 side. So, what I did was contour the clasp at the hinge and remove one permanent link on the 6:00 side (with one removable link added on the 12:00 side). The result is perfect fit on my 6.75" wrist, and the clasp sits nice and flat along the bottom of my wrist. Maybe this would work for you as well... On the new 5711 and the rest of the new (genuine) line up, the watches are equipped with display backs. Older Jumbos along with the MBW/MBK rep have a solid back. As a matter of fact, the back on the rep is integral with the case; i.e. when you want to open up the watch, you have to do it from the bezel by removing the 4 screws projecting into the case hinges (or as some might call them, ears) and lift the entire bezel/crystal assembly off the case. This is just like gen... Monocoque case...
  17. Antonio- This is the MBK/MBW/TW Best Royal Oak. You may want to check with the usual suspects who have access to MBW pieces as they can probably sort one out for you If I may take this thread slightly off topic... The gold screws on this watch are really not so apparent in everyday situ. Glancing at the watch thoughout my work day in different environments, I honestly don't even notice them; depending on what they're reflecting, they can sometimes even appear to be silver with a warm glow to them. Hard to describe. Anyways... Don't let this small detail keep you from getting one of these fine watches! And... If it really bothers you, you can have them plated with WG...
  18. The case for the Classic Chrono is 40mm in diameter to the tallest point of the crown guard; 38mm without crown guard. I think the one you posted is listed at 42mm, though the subject of measurement can be interpreted in different manners depending on how it's measured (e.g. w/cg, w/o cg inc. crown, etc). So... Who's to say? Perhaps it's a good basis for a 25860, but my thinking is it's too big (both diameter and profile/height)...
  19. Doh... I'm sorry. I thought the topic was for the general populous... I forgot about the actual RWG terminology of 'Collectors' as we know it today...
  20. I myself had been somewhat burned out on watches in general as well. Almost to the point of selling some of my pieces off, but my wife wouldn't let me She knows the level of effort that I've made in building up my small collection, and she knows that a lot of the pieces I own are hard to find and build. So... I decided to focus my attention on an old hobby instead (the one that I more or less abandoned for watches a few years back), and I've found myself thinking about watches less, which in turn has actually allowed me to enjoy them again. I've always had an interest in watches, but for the past few years I've been involved so deeply that I couldn't see the forest from the trees. So, taking a step back has allowed me to look at this hobby in a different, and perhaps a fresh perspective. Sometimes, all you need is a little break....
  21. No surprise here... The most common pair found on my wrist... But... To break the streak, I have had this one on for a few days now, and feel as though it will be a regular wearer as well...
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up