How about validating members or requiring an "I agree" clause that you are not affiliated with ... Keep all those CEO's and paneristi's off the forum.
I am not worried about access to reps. The business has taken off and you aren't keeping this genie in the bottle. Stealing intellectual property and knocking it off is a central tenet of the largest populace in the world. 80% of what is produced is sold in that country. And by the way that country is building up well over a trillion dollars of trade surplus. Who is gonna take them on? A central government with that kind of financial might can ruin any currency it wants. In spite of all the wishful thinking, this business has dramatically expanded - not shrunk. Think about the last time when RWG 1 got hit. There were one or two websites and several photo-buckets. Now it is a much more professional business with far more readily available access. The Hublot's and Rolexes have to do everything in their power to protect their intellectual property but the only defense is truly defensible intellectual property. IMHO, Rolex has not made a significant advance in years other than lowering the cost of their manufacturing through use of machines. To their credit, Hublot has come up with some design innovations but is still sticking with stock movements. There is a reason why only the most basic VC's and Pateks's can be well-rep'ed.
More importantly, I do hope a workable solution can be arranged. After four years and numerous ups and downs, the quality of aesthetic is better and the business is bigger. Trying to shut down forums like this will not slow down the trade. But it will allow gen manufacturers to feel better and in the short term makes it inconvenient.