lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 another Maker has taken on the Top Gun Ceramic.. and IMO it is improved greatly !! On first glance the crystal may be a sore thumb .... it does appear that they have used old stock as the AR is a bit yellowed . not a problem for chieftang though... the concentric rings have been detailed .. sharper actually.. as has the sub rings on the 12 and 6 .. it morphs more grey in direct lighting.. The pushers are defined better toward the Ti look... improved The casting for the ceramic case is improved also.. with the TG logo sharper and crisper.. The Maker has the case back as ss.. it is I bleieve ti... it's too dark to be anything else.. The most impoved component that is not a part of the case.. the strap is .. on the V2 not needing anything but wear Totally imporoved in the small details of the Watch.. chiefs AR will do wonders.. thanks for Viewing A~C Lani
Mickey Padge Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Thanks for the write up Lani, great shots as always! It looks so much nicer, especially the case engraving on the side, the V1 was a real mess there..... How are the hour markers, straight and aligned OK? Cheers!
Guest asim Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 lani, the watch looks awesome! thanks for the review. with Chiefs AR this beauty will be a keepr!
lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 the hour markers are "improved" over the past Pilots.. however "improved" may not hold water... it is still the stick on variety but better.. still in need of relume.. but some may choose to leave them alone.. L
newak Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Well, that throws a spanner in the works. I was on the cusp, and I do mean reaching for the credit card, to get my first rep - a V3 3717. Now, well... back to square one! Thank you for the great pics Lani.
GoFaster Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Very this Top Gun !!! I don't know very well this model of IWC but there is only Schaffhausen on the dial...Not IWC ?
Mickey Padge Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 the hour markers are "improved" over the past Pilots.. however "improved" may not hold water... it is still the stick on variety but better.. still in need of relume.. but some may choose to leave them alone.. L They look well cut and straight, I have yet to see any crooked ones, but that may change as more peeps post their pictures!
newak Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Very this Top Gun !!! I don't know very well this model of IWC but there is only Schaffhausen on the dial...Not IWC ? 3rd pic from top - IWC on the 9 subdial - hidden by minute hand on main pic
GoFaster Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 ouch sorry...haven't seen it ! It's a really nice Iwc !!!!!!! I like it !!!!
newak Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 ouch sorry...haven't seen it ! It's a really nice Iwc !!!!!!! I like it !!!! I also missed it it the first time - I had to go back and check!
lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 Thanks all.. wish I were 100 % ... these are all the images I.. am capbable of at the time.. hope it helped..
AstroAvia Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 Should the 3, 6, 9 and 12h markers be as raised as they seem to be? These markers even cast shadow over the dial!
lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 Should the 3, 6, 9 and 12h markers be as raised as they seem to be? These markers even cast shadow over the dial! If you are familiar with the genuine dial.. then you will know the genuine markers are elevated in a way as not to be blocky.. this is a rep dial.. the only way to compensate for that fact is a "relume" what this dial has to offer is a "better" 3.6.9.12 markers than previous reps.. the marcros will also "detail" what the naked eye cannot see... L
elisiX Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 (edited) Thanks for this Lankai. I was waiting on your review. Came across this yesterday on RG though. http://www.repgeek.com/showthread.php?t=69587 Seems as though what you say is correct, but a direct comparison by Toro shows that the V2 dial print is terrible compared to the V1. From what I can tell, V1 dial + V2 case/watch + Chief AR + Vaclume will give you an incredible Top Gun. Spoke to Vac about doing an all in one (buy the watch, lume it, send crystal out to chief) and he says its possible. I just gotta choose V1 or V2. Edited July 9, 2009 by elisiX
lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 I am not intending to enter a contest of "right ~Wrong" but for what its worth.. take a look at the review pics from the V1 (which should actually be the V2.. since it was the second V to arrive but the first one the Perfect Clones distributed,.. the first was PVD)) the markers are fat.. the font on the day~date off.. the Ti is to light on the crown and pushers.. I would venture to say the V2 is hands down a better representation.. this is the V1 pics..
lanikai Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 this is the link to the First true ceramic replication of the TG.. the first was only PVD. http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=92859 but the V1 Ceramic was very problematic from Lume dust to sub hands falling off.. the case back threads were stripped.. the current strap that was released with the V2 ... IMO.. is the best one any maker has produced.. like the genuine it is thick then tapers thinner.. with great balance and it is very soft leather.. behind the nylon.. this is what makes the difference.. the Ceramic is well balanced on the wrist with a good kevlar strap... imo.. L
ubiquitous Posted July 9, 2009 Report Posted July 9, 2009 'V2' definitely looks to be a step up from 'V1'; very nicely done. Still can't jive with the TOP GUN logo on the side of the case though... Would prefer without altogether... But, what can ya do? Except maybe take a 3717 and PVD it?
lanikai Posted July 10, 2009 Author Report Posted July 10, 2009 this pic is imo.. the best representation of the dial.. sub rings are heavier.. concentric circles more evident.. font on the day/date more pronounced... and the beauty of the Ti. @ Ubi... You come from the land of "NORAD" ... and ... "Skunk Works" ... and the "Academy" .. no wonder you will not wear the logo..
elisiX Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 I agree. The V2 (latest version) is the better representation. Just in the pics I posted above, it seems as though the dial text is sharper on the V1. Looking at it again though, the markers are a little messy on the V1, better on the V2. V2 overall is the go.
elisiX Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 ps. Im going to get Vac to order me one, (V2), lume it and have Chief do the AR and ill post it up when its done.
lanikai Posted July 10, 2009 Author Report Posted July 10, 2009 I agree. The V2 (latest version) is the better representation. Just in the pics I posted above, it seems as though the dial text is sharper on the V1. Looking at it again though, the markers are a little messy on the V1, better on the V2. V2 overall is the go. always take into consideration ... "lighting".. that's why its difficult to go "side by side" at times unless the lighting is perfectly the same.. variables in sharpness may occur..
Toadtorrent Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 Fantastic pics as always, and it looks to be a great piece.
elisiX Posted July 10, 2009 Report Posted July 10, 2009 True L.. also, no two reps are always the same im sure. Just because the print was bad on the V2 pictueres by Toro doesn't mean it is on yours. Actually can you do a rough comparison (just with your own eyes) with your watch (V2) and you old V1 or Toro's pics of his V1. Just curious to know if its a one off or if the text is in fact poorly printed across the V2 supply. Thanks in advance.
lanikai Posted July 10, 2009 Author Report Posted July 10, 2009 Actually can you do a rough comparison (just with your own eyes) with your watch (V2) and you old V1 or Toro's pics of his V1. Just curious to know if its a one off or if the text is in fact poorly printed across the V2 supply. Thanks in advance. what "jumps" out at me is the V1 is very irregular as uniformity with "all" the numerals.. some 1's like the 11 is thicker individually than the 1 after the 12.. the V2 is more uniformed as far as size and crispness of font... much more uniformed throughout..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now