rolli Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 http://www.1-pc8838.com/0000pn16201-162f-chrono-ssle-blackgrey-asian-7753-p-9230.html Pam162F Released rolli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grew Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 aren't the subdials a little light? I really like it but i don't think they got the dial color right IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormTooper4 Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I want that dial, nice one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolexfinder Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Crown guard lever is also wrong as well. Cheers, Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swdivad Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 the gen 162 is anthracite (I believe)... this one seems just black... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I looked at the site and can't tell what is going on with the dial. I look forward to seeing pics from a member. if they get it right it would be great. Actually it would the first panda they got right. I posted a pic or two elsewhere of a gen 162. The dial should be black with very muted (non-metallic) sub dials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dluddy Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 This would be killer if they got it right. been waiting for this one for a long time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxman Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 aren't the subdials a little light? I really like it but i don't think they got the dial color right IMO I think the sub dials are way to light,the dial is pretty close,but those sub dials Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadtorrent Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I think the sub dials are way to light,the dial is pretty close,but those sub dials It could be photo lighting...you need to buy one and review for the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxman Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 It could be photo lighting...you need to buy one and review for the team. You make a good point,It could be the lighting,I hope so. The one that really has my attention Is the 251 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 If someone picks it up I will try and match up some shots from a gen I have to whatever pics you take so we can see. I looked at the pictures again and the dial certainly looks better than past attempts at Panda dials. Hope springs eternal. I have owned the gen for years and I still love it. If accurate this is a great rep and a little bit different from out PAM's out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverworn Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 here is a pic of my gen.. :wub: unfortunatly sold a long time ago :cry2: :cry2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esco Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Huge difference in the shade of grey... but not too bad of an attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dluddy Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I would bet they used the same material on the subs as they used for the 089 GMT dial. Looks like the lighting effect on the Perfect Clones Pic make it appear lighter Can't wait for someone to get one and post pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senator Posted September 19, 2010 Report Share Posted September 19, 2010 who cares????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmeister Posted September 19, 2010 Report Share Posted September 19, 2010 Here is another shot of a 162 in natural daylight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now