Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

freddy333

Diamond Member
  • Posts

    15,775
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    187

Everything posted by freddy333

  1. Wow, that tube!!!!!!!!
  2. Chief (or anyone) - Not a big deal since most of my shooting with the 400D/Xti (which I ordered (body only) this morning) will be based on a tripod, but I was wondering if this lens has any form of anti-shake compensation? Again, not a big deal since I will be using the LX3 as my walk-about shooter. But, in my brief time with the SX10, its Image Stabilization saved my cookies on more than 1 occasion.
  3. Much obliged, Cat.
  4. Chubbchubb & Demsey - a number of the editing/posting functions (like the multi-reply option) are missing from the Full editor, but I want to thank you both (and anyone else I may have missed) for your kind words. The music is Lena Horne - Stormy Weather, which I thought was sufficiently old that its original 1940s copyright would have lapsed by now. But, since youtube clipped the soundtrack on their copy, I guess not.
  5. Ending the work week with my beater Admin - The editing functions are missing from the top of the editor. I had to write the tags manually.
  6. Keep 'em coming, Ubi
  7. Hi Bill. What brought you back? Looking for a new fix?
  8. It looks like a genuine insert, but a modern service replacement instead of an original (or vintage replacement). Similar to what I have on mine (though mine came from PMWF instead of an RSC).
  9. Yes, I came across that (& another similar mod) early on in my research & I might, at some point, give it a try. This pic was shot in a fairly dark room using the built-in flash from a distance of about 10' in Auto mode. The gray sack in the background is about 1' behind the watch. There is no way you could get such a shallow dof with a standard point-&-shoot As you can see above, there is a good deal of noise throughout the picture. This is 1 of the SX10 IS's (& G10's) Achilles heels (the other being chromatic aberrations (color fringing)). The version I originally posted (below) was run through NoiseNinja to tone down as much of the noise as I could without sacrificing too much detail N.B. both shots were made without any Photoshop filtering/tricks & without my tripod. That is, the camera was hand-held - like most of the better modern cameras, the SX10 IS has a very effective image stabilizer).
  10. Thanks, Chief. That is exactly the kind of user impression I was looking for. I found a factory refurbed XTi (body only) for $370 (year warranty). Does this seem reasonable?
  11. Definitely gen & the seller has a tremendous collection of vintage Rolex (I have used a number of his pieces as models for some of my projects)
  12. You need to unfold the links, remove or add new links as needed & then refold the original links. There is a special tool that Rolex & some watchmakers have that performs this task in a way that deformation of the unfolded links is kept to a minimum. But I do not know anyone who has the tool, so the only options are to use a pair of screwdrivers to carefully pry the links apart or take the bracelet to a watchmaker & let him handle the work (most older professional watchmakers have done this enough times that they are able to resize the bracelet without mangling the links too much).
  13. OPD today
  14. A comment for Delta (regarding his quandary over which camera to buy) & a general question (about which DSLR to buy for me) - Delta - Recently, I have been considering 2 of the 3 cameras you are (G10 vs LX3 vs Canon SX10 IS). The bottom line is that I got the SX10 & G10 & did not see that much difference, image quality wise (my primary concern). However, the 20x zoom & Super Macro feature on the SX10 made it the clear winner (between those 2 cameras) for me, especially because that nearly endless zoom (coupled with a wide open aperture) allows me to do SLR-like narrow dof (depth of field) shots with good bokeh (pleasant looking background focus), which the G10's 5x zoom cannot quite achieve. However, the SX10 (& G10) has 2 serious downsides - noise (essentially spurious speckling) & chromatic aberrations (rainbows/color fringing along edges where light areas meet dark areas (think white lume meets black dial), which, for me, pretty much counter its zoom/Super Macro benefits. And these problems occur at all ISO/aperture settings. The LX3's noise & chromatic aberrations are much less noticeable below 400ISO, which is where the majority of my shooting occurs, so it is not a problem. Also, & equally important, a crosshatch (series of intersecting vertical & horizontal lines used to test focus & image alignment (especially in the corners)) shot with the LX3 appeared more uniform & square, while both Canons exhibited noticeable bending (barrel distortion) as you move away from the center of the image. However, the LX3 has its limitations - a relatively short (2.5x) optical zoom & a separate lens cap, which probably seems like a silly thing to complain about, but, for me, to be truly useful as a point-&-shoot, you have to be able to fit the camera (comfortably) into a cargo pants pocket, switch the camera on, take the picture, switch the camera off & return it to your pocket with 1 hand (that is, without having to fiddle with a separate lens cover). Unfortunately, of the 3 cameras, only the G10 has an automatic lens cover that opens (when the camera is switched on) & closes (when the camera is switched off) automatically. That said, the LX3's image quality was so good that it trumped the inconvenience of having to deal with a manual lens cover (which is saying alot when you like to shoot from a moving motorcycle). But, in the end, I went with the LX3 (also from Dell) because I decided to supplement my point-&-shoot with either the SX10 (for close macros or long-distance zooming) or a DSLR. Which brings me to my own question......... My question - I still have the SX10, because of its phenomenal 20x zoom & Super Macro. But, even though the SX10's resolution is significantly better than my old 4MP A80, its noise & chromatic aberrations make some macros look like a significant step below the A80 (unless you shoot in black & white (which eliminates all of the color fringing), in which case, the SX10 is spectacular)). So I am considering returning the SX10 & replacing it with 1 of these 2 DSLRs - Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi Nikon D60 Anyone with direct/personal experience with BOTH of these models have an opinion as to which makes a better picture (especially in macro)?
  15. Purchased in London many years ago.
  16. Congratulations on a great find. For years, there has been heated (& ongoing) debate over the cause of the discoloration, but I would love to see the catalogs that show new Rolex watches with yellow tritium/lume. I spent some time working in a jewelry/watch repair store as a kid & I only ever saw white. Maybe the catalog has itself discolored?
  17. Thank you & yes.
  18. Just came in from a (Tuesday) night in town
  19. For those who have requested a portfolio of my watch pics, download it here (file is 15.5 megs in .wmv format) - The Luxury of Time (In case you have trouble downloading, I posted a copy on Youtube but it is next to useless because they stripped out the soundtrack) Bon Appétit.
  20. If there is 1 thing I have learned when relying on other people for help, seek & ye shall find. Have you tried ebay?
  21. Nice to see you back in action, Ziggy.
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up