QueTip

Glad to be able to get back on here too. It's just the countdown that makes me curious..

Looks amazing. Wear her well!

@nanuq it could be even worse...

Wow, that looks amazing!

Oh snap, I gots to hate Apples spelling function.. Never again. I initially said 'Although, that movement does look like an SA to me.' I don't know what's so hard about that.. Maybe Apple just can't get over my scouser accent.

The dial is fantasy Mark. As for the movement, I don't think that it's an SA but a simple Miyota or ETA clone with 3135 deco. They have the 'SA3135' listed in the title of the watch if it's SA. Also that movement doesn't look like an SA to me.

Noob

I'm allowing myself to speak for @sacsah1 and say: 'that's a gen!'

I stand corrected... How didn't I see that dial... Of course, this is a 116500LN. I wasn't completely sure on the bezel, on some pictures it looked kind of funky but on the last one it looked perfect but yet, I still assumed it was aftermarket and just a good angle because the dial confused me for a second..

Lol, go from gen hands to gen hands? Nice gen mate. Only thing not gen on this thing is the bezel. It's a 116520 on an aftermarket black bezel.

@sacsah1 has the best ceramic Bluesy @someguyinfrance has the best 5 digit Bluesy

I'm feeling free to also list the flaws.. Case: the lugs are off, they should be thin and not so thick Crown: too big Crown Guards: way to thick and round, for a 16610 they should be small and short also pointy when looked at from the face side Dial: totally off.. Maxi Markers are incorrect for the LN (only done on the 5 digit LV) and dial print is also a total disaster in terms of font, placement and quality Hands: also off, they're are too fat, the minute hand is too fat and looks like it could be used for a Maxi Sub dial better than this, also they're stacked on H2 position which is also a flaw. (most high grade ETA based Reps are too but it's a flaw nonetheless) Insert: odd print and the pearl is not looking good. The surround is too wide and the pearl doesn't look good in general Bezel Ring: bezel teeth are to shallow and should be deeper. Also the steel 'ring' (the thing that is before the bezel teeth start) that is around the upper side of the insert should also be started earlier SEL: Shape looks odd, it's too recessed Bracelet: looks like solid links whereas the 16610 has hollow mid links. Also the SEL part looks super disgusting from the back. Clasp: Totally off, there shouldn't be a nail groove and the coronet is off too, clasp engravings also look ugly Rehaut: Wrong font, engraving style Markers: also totally off, mixed Maxi markers with non maxi ones.. (i.e. 6, 9) DateWheel: Wrong font, misplaced There's more to all that, that's just a simple list. Gen for reference:

Heh, can't wait to see it fully mounted. EDIT: This is a Mikey's classic DW for LWO and the spots you may see on it are just dust specs.

As some of you may have heard.. AP brought some very nice pieces to SIHH 2017. . Here they are:

+1

Oh wait, I didn't do that? ? Excuse me, must have been blind again when I posted it lmao

The left one is gen.

Really regretting selling this... I'm having a lot of regret moments lately.

+1

I feel your pain.. ducking autocorrect ? LOL! ?

Gusta

If you ask me, don't ask for others opinions but buy what ever watch you like and you can see yourself wearing! I know and have seen a LOT of women wearing regular sized watches such as Subs, GMTs, Daytonas and even APs! And let me tell you, on 9 out of 10 of these people these watches looked amazing on them. I have digged out a few pics for you to judge for yourself. Anyway, whatever you do, make sure to post it on here!

Looks great brother! I always told you Wear her in good health! I honestly prefer the black on black version over the Panda too.

Lol

Luckily these are only rumors for now. I don't feel that SD4k.. would be something different with a red print and with regular minute tracks..