rosnik

Were is 369M from?

Nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Did you thought that recessing a bit the insert ( only for TC bezel ) can solve?

It seems like Seadweller . If you like to wrist , that's nice ..

Thank you for interesting write up! About Etaswiss/ Gen 93250 , On my Sean's 16610 Case, the GEN 93250 fit without problem. I suppose it's your single case problem .

For one 7 years hold rep it's really nice. Off course, you can not get in paragon with last 1:1 build models....

IMO: No lugholes, I think Max 3/4 yeas hold .

Do your one got some measures?

My sa3135 accept Gen hands too.

Nice review and great pictures! My compliments and thank you, Martin.

It isn't 1:1 construction..........

Thank you Zeleni!

Q: Is Steve the new DW proprietary ? Is David no more In business?

Don't tell me more " MW", please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! :bangin: :bangin: :bangin:

+1 This first time that I read WM9 V3 fit without mod the 3135, Are you sure? If it is real, is not possible to get one, NOW. Wile, I received from TC some spares already, and TC was serious and economic ,( thank you TC ). What do you need more? About George: Are you sure that G. is involved with TC ? Thats only becouse he can get some 16610 (3135) cases ? Than, what can you seed about Sean ( correct person too )? I think that before to point a person, some prove would be present to support what you seed .

Guys......... I'm attuned by this 3D. Do you read the TITLE? "TC Submariner Housing Gen 3135 & Gen Parts" . So is not the way to get TC 16610 in paragon with the great products sold by BK. Bk 16610 do not accept 3135. So Is it easy..................................... They are different products for different users.

There is no way to get one correct Frankey 14060.......

Oopsss, No ending story! Now come interesting points. Virtually , if we would get one 14060, can we take 16610 case ( with lugholes) ? Can we Get there one SD gen crystal ( I suppose lower gasket ) ? Do 16610 retaining ring accept SD Gen bezel? Thank you.

I took info about, Andy is in right! http://forums.watchuseek.com/f23/difference-between-subamriner-14060-116610-a-509946.html I was in error because I sow one 14060 with SEL. One of my friend got it , but I didn't know it's modded. I'll take picture and info when I'll meet. I found info about SEL mod too, not so easy : http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=88728

Andy, sorry but I changed pictures on that tread ( in 5 minutes) only because the tread was referred to 16610 and not to 14060 that I erroneously posted. That's all.....and simply all ...........

No, I didn't write that exist the 14060 with SEL only. Are there around GEN 14060 with folding last link types too. But, ( IMO ) the types with lugholes and SEL ( like last 14060 ) and 14060M, on my opinion, are sure best. Now... I hope you can understand my writing.

http://www.rwg.cc/index.php?app=core&module=search&search_in=forums

FxrAndy :Pay attention , the 14060 case is small that 16610 one. They are different, and if you want one relly correct REP, is not possible to transform data type in No-data type. highoeyazmuhudee :About lugholes, yes of course, wile (IMO) factory made holes are sure perfect made....

yes, last one 14060M got SEL, rehaul and lugholes. 14060 last rev. pre M got lughole and SEL

I'm for PRE - Z series. Lugholes , SEL, no rehault engraving. It's best SUB Rolex ever made.