There are various factors which stop me being so unequivocal about this being a straightforward case of fraud.
First, it appears that the seller is itself an auction house / liquidator so it's likely that it's a company involved, with a lot to lose if they are found to be deliberately engaging in fraudulent activity. Also, they appear to have never sold any APs before on eBay (I don't know about outside eBay). The watch is described in such an amateurish and incorrect manner that the person who did the write up probably doesn't know anything about ROOs beyond what someone told him or what he found on an internet site. It just doesn't seem right that someone would go all the way to conduct this fraud and then ruin it all with such a basic, basic error in the description that no-one who knows about ROOs would ever make.
In any event, it is absolutely correct that the auction is reported, because the watch is definitely a rep.