munk Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 (edited) im just testing my new sony ericsson k800i. the sub looks so sharp Edited September 25, 2006 by munk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshoot Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Who did you get it from - it looks great. Have you done any mods to it or did it come like this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gioarmani Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 I'm guessing EL's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 From a quick look it looks genuine...but the gigantic winding crown and pearl are the giveaways. Excellent though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alextor Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Excellent piece... good date alignement and mag...not sure about the Cg's...they look better than other versions...probably the pearl is the giveaway...but not a flat pearl though. All in all, a great looking watch. Congratulations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolfire Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 From a quick look it looks genuine...but the gigantic winding crown and pearl are the giveaways. Excellent though. That's right... Also, the date font looks pretty off too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Got it from Paul, its the "so called perfect sub". No mod have been made yet. mite be changing the insert someday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 That's right... Also, the date font looks pretty off too... the date font looks ok to me i think the angel when i took the pic makes it looks weird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 here's another pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Padge Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Got it from Paul, its the "so called perfect sub". No mod have been made yet. mite be changing the insert someday. A lot of people have been waiting to have a good look at Pauls "Perfect" Sub. If you could get some more pictures of this watch I think it would answer a few questions as to the price difference for example when compared to other dealers........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Interesting, your sub looks the same as my TTK (Neil) sub! Same bezel insert w/ smallish pearl, same 4 on the 40 (new font for latest model subs- I've compared to the gen) Same good date mag w/ the new thinner date font Same big crown, the biggest drawback as far as I'm concerned Same crown guards- better but IMO, they could stand to be straightened up on the inside slightly And yes, it looks alot like pics of EL's. I would assume these are all coming from Guangzhou, mainly because that's where Paul is, and it's the watch capitol of the world! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 the dial printing looks so perfect just like the gen. as for the rehaut, the gen has a slightly deeper rehaut which i've compare wif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 Looks damm good to me... I think they came from same factory for some of the Dealers... Paul,TTK, etc... Rg tribal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Padge Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 It seems strange that they would put that crown on what is an otherwise VERY good watch. Why do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshoot Posted September 25, 2006 Report Share Posted September 25, 2006 I don't know about the crown looking too big. On my gen 2001, the crown looks big too. Sorry about the rough picture, it is at the local AD getting it's battle scars fixed as I write this. Munk's Sub looks to be about the right proportion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 (edited) This gen got a pretty big crown too...anyway wats the correct size for the crown? Edited September 26, 2006 by munk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Interesting, your sub looks the same as my TTK (Neil) sub! Same bezel insert w/ smallish pearl, same 4 on the 40 (new font for latest model subs- I've compared to the gen) Same good date mag w/ the new thinner date font Same big crown, the biggest drawback as far as I'm concerned Same crown guards- better but IMO, they could stand to be straightened up on the inside slightly And yes, it looks alot like pics of EL's. I would assume these are all coming from Guangzhou, mainly because that's where Paul is, and it's the watch capitol of the world! Is ur ttk sub eta? can post some pics here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshoot Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Yeah munk, I think your Sub is pretty smokin' for an off-the-shelf model. And, given the fact it is blown up to the size of a hockey puck in the pictures, it would be even harder to tell on a wrist shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonthebhoy Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 And, given the fact it is blown up to the size of a hockey puck in the pictures, it would be even harder to tell on a wrist shot. This is a very significant point. It's easy to pick out the faults when the watch is magnified ten fold. This watch watch looks great for the money that I know some dealers are selling it for. JTB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 so far im pretty happy wif the watch. timing is quite accurate. lots of my fren asking how many grant i bought this sub... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Munk, Can you post Paul's link? I want to investigate his watches. Your sub looks very good. I know every rep has flaws. I want to limit these to CG which is easy to reshape. Next is bezel insert - getting a gen insert and the work needed is quite expensive. I think mag and date font problem would be nasty. If you don't mind, please take a few more pics of the date font. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Munk, Can you post Paul's link? I want to investigate his watches. Paul is also an registered dealer here... you can find his link in his section... Click here for Pauls section Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 I think paul's site is down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted September 26, 2006 Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 Thanks for the link. I found another thread that has pics of Paul's sub, same as Munk's, I think. http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showto...462&hl=paul You can see the pearl on the bezel insert not quite correct. I don't know how to describe it, it's recessed like the gen's, but the pearl is smaller, the ring around it seems to thick. Look at ubi's gen bezel: http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=10204&hl=. The date font is definitely wrong. Sorry, Munk. Also, the second hand is too long. It's touching the minute markers. The best basis for mod may be Eddie Lee's sub if the mag is correct, http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=8192. None of the pics are actually clear enough. But the bezel pearl seems decent. If the mag is correct, all you have to do is reshape the cg. It's not gonna be a ubi franken-sub but good enough for many of us. Can somebody post some more Eddie Lee's sub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munk Posted September 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2006 (edited) i got no problem for any bad comments on my watch. its a replica anyway there's always flaws here and there everything cannot be perfect. Its pretty good have this kind of quality replica wif the amount of money i paid. im satisfied wif it. The perfect Sub would be Genuine Edited September 26, 2006 by munk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.