Gadget Man Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 See what you guys think but keep in mind one is a couple of years older than the other Both together Watch 'A' And now for watch 'B' Watch 'A' on the left, Watch 'B' is on the right (sorry but I couldn't find my tripod so it's not as clear as I would have liked)
Nanuq Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 "B" is the rep.... and very nicely done!
freddy333 Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 Not sure about A, but B is definitely a rep.
Gadget Man Posted September 15, 2011 Author Report Posted September 15, 2011 I find it intersting that no one has got it right yet lol... I will let you keep gussing :-)
freddy333 Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 Obviously, B must be the gen then (I think I got some of the pics confused).
Ray T Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 not sure if all the pics are labeled correctly, but b looks pretty good!
ubiquitous Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 A looks like a rep to me. B looks gen. I'll admit- This is a tricky one, but I'm looking at and comparing the crown position and hands.
rosnik Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 Can you get pictures from the crown side please? :-)
praetor Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 (edited) I guess the cat is out of the bag. Hard to tell without a profile shot. Watch A has identical rehaut and crown guards to my wm9. So there you go. while the rehaut height is perfect, wm9 is slightly less wokky than gen. side note: need to work on my trolling. of course they're not both gen, who in the right mind would buy 2 identical modern subs. Edited September 15, 2011 by praetor
Gadget Man Posted September 15, 2011 Author Report Posted September 15, 2011 See if this helps Watch 'A' and watch 'B'
www_watch Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 I'd say "B" is gen. The dial just looks so much better.
its_urabus Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 I think both are frankens. B seems to be more gen. based on case, Crown position and brushing.
woof* Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 B has good hands That's what she said.......
txrob779 Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 B I'll go out on a limp and say...PEARL gives it away. Especially the last pic of A in the first set of pics....looks like a big zit. Rob
Gadget Man Posted September 15, 2011 Author Report Posted September 15, 2011 Ok well I will let you in on the truth now then....... Watch 'A' is a BK WM9 and is my daily wearer, I've had it since September last year (I was number 24 in the BK waiting list), watch 'B' is a gen that I have bought this week. It's 2006 D serial that's had very little wear.
txrob779 Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 Darn close rep for sure...I would be VERY happy to have that example.
highoeyazmuhudee Posted September 15, 2011 Report Posted September 15, 2011 i chose B, given the awesomeness of A why did you buy B?
Gadget Man Posted September 15, 2011 Author Report Posted September 15, 2011 i chose B, given the awesomeness of A why did you buy B? I must admit watch 'A' is awsome, BK's WM9 TT was a great purchase but it's not going up in value like the real thing is it so I bought the gen as an investment and it will probably sit in the safe for a few years. To be honest, I didn't realise just how good the WM9 TT was until I put them both side by side and as I have already said, the WM9 TT is my daily wearer so it has been in swimming pools and used quite a bit, but its a dam fine watch for a rep :-)
relaxman Posted September 16, 2011 Report Posted September 16, 2011 The second pic in "watch A" is actually the gen correct ? Just put in the wrong place ?
relaxman Posted September 16, 2011 Report Posted September 16, 2011 Why is my kitty avatar not showing up? Shows in my profile.
Gadget Man Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Posted September 16, 2011 The second pic in "watch A" is actually the gen correct ? Just put in the wrong place ? No, all of the pics for watch 'A' are watch 'A' i.e. the rep, I haven't mixed up the photo's if that's what you are thinking.
slickdick Posted September 16, 2011 Report Posted September 16, 2011 Wm9 TT can be easily recognized by the end links (too long), and the nudge where the crown meets case (easy to hide in pics).
relaxman Posted September 16, 2011 Report Posted September 16, 2011 Oh, it looked liked the second pic had the smaller surrounds and fatter font on the bezel. Must be the angle.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now