Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

JoeyB's wares now appearing on VRF!


Recommended Posts

Posted

He has to call it "ugly". It's not genuine Rolex. That's in the by-laws of VRF. :whistling:

 

I don't have a 'Samu' in my records, but I have shipped more than a dozen inserts to the Hong Kong and Singapore. 

Posted (edited)

Grreeeaaaattt.   Snobbish outsiders drawing attention once again to our world, even though I know there is a gentleman's agreement of detante.  We get enough trolls around here as it is.  Can't wait for the hoards...

 

Join Date - 32 seconds ago

Posts - 2

 

"I have a Priceless John Maher PN Daytona that I need a bezel for.  Can you help me source a new one from a rep dealer?  What I would really like is an NOS gen one, but I just don't know where to get a good one that I can tell is really gen."

Edited by cjjoyce1
Posted

Yup,

They can call it whatever they wish!That GMT has seen many "battlefields" & the JoeyB insert looked dandy!It's former bakelite insert would not have the same presence for sure as it would be crazed, cracked & badly glued together as most are!....Hurray for RWG.

Best, mcotter

  • Like 1
Posted

Been there done that with the snobs on VRF, I wouldn't be surprised if many of those purists own Frankins unknowingly.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually a lot of them do own frankens... And knowingly trade in them... And buy cobbled together, other-wise unobtainable rare ones from 'respected authorities.'

Been there done that with the snobs on VRF, I wouldn't be surprised if many of those purists own Frankins unknowingly.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

This place has honestly ruined me for just accepting any Rolex as-is genuine... Knowing what I know now, having built a 5513 with a 1520 movement, owning 2 other gen's and seeing how easily replicated they are... I'm just totally over it. The idea of people being snobbish about a Rolex is silly. The idea that some of these great watches out there being purveyed, as POTR says, by revered authorities claiming that they are 110% original and genuine is foolish given Rolex's terrible service records and history of swapping parts around as well as "cobblers" getting at them over the years. 


For example:

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-VINTAGE-DAYTONA-6264-PAUL-NEWMAN-CHRONOGRAPH-1968-/151533742977?pt=Wristwatches&hash=item23481d6b81

Posted

Yes. I love how one in particular who shares a name in common with me, manages to produce, er, procure perfect, mint, unimpeachably original, investment grade, Paul Newmans on a regular basis for the purist prudes.

  • Like 1
Guest baleinedessable
Posted

Yes you are right..I have seen my self, on VRF, so many topics where tiny details were discussed during weeks about a part, a hairline brush longer than it should be.. And during the same time, really suspicous timepieces were sold on the marketplace without any words said about.. 

 

Let's say they have a great expertise, but this expertise is sometimes not focused on the right members over there..

 

And to be honest : way much more expertise and fun here around !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up