Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

No need for mods---


GFish

Recommended Posts

Hey All! A few days ago, I asked members which watch in their rep collection was the closet to the gen---right out of the box---no modifications. Especially given the recent posts about new reps getting better and better with no need for mods, I thought you might be interested in the responses. Here's the list:

Omega Seamaster (Old version)

Rolex Yachtmaster

Pan 2B (Josh)

EL V2 1950

AP JA

Omega Seamaster Pro (lots of votes!)

Omega GMT (Andrew)

Explorer 2

FM Conquistador

What do you think? Comments? Additions???

All the best---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey All! A few days ago, I asked members which watch in their rep collection was the closet to the gen---right out of the box---no modifications. Especially given the recent posts about new reps getting better and better with no need for mods, I thought you might be interested in the responses. Here's the list:

Omega Seamaster (Old version)

Rolex Yachtmaster

Pan 2B (Josh)

EL V2 1950

AP JA

Omega Seamaster Pro (lots of votes!)

Omega GMT (Andrew)

Explorer 2

FM Conquistador

What do you think? Comments? Additions???

All the best---

excellent! i'd put the FM on the top of the list though.

edit: what about IWC GST chrono? one big bad [censored]!

Edited by Hok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, none of my reps have made the list so far. :p

I'll add:

Pam GMT 029 & 063, ETA2893-2

Pam 036 w/o the canion pin issues, Joshua

Pam 111 & 111H

Pam 196, ETA 7753

Pam 183 (careful with the crown threads!)

MBW 1680

MBW 1665

MBW, James Bond

Rollie Explorer I, ETA 2836

Omega Speedmaster Broad Arrow, Venus manual copy movement

These are all terrific as well. :thumbsupsmileyanim:

Jet

Edited by Jetsons
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see a PO on your list I would have thought Neil or Andrews lastest version would have picked up a few votes.

Ken

Ditto. 4th gen PO definitely belongs to that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would nice if you could put a picture of the SMP and tell who is the dealer

Check my Omega guides. All answers are there (and more).

http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=426

http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=4509

Pic of the SMP:

47967-36776.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would nice if you could put a picture of the SMP and tell who is the dealer

The older version SMP they are talking about is hard to comeby. The new model is quite different. Just open your eyes if your are interested. They showup for sale sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the bezel pearl is horrific. Why can't the pearls be made properly?

Diver watch replicas often have "horrific" pearls... difficult to say why. But PO 4th gen has one of the best rep pearls (yep, it's still quite bad but I've seen much worse). Like the 3rd gen pearl. :lol:

You have to keep in mind that huge pics often exaggerate the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breitling Navitimer, Steelfish and Avenger are very good replicas. Vacheron Constantin Overseas, AP Royal Oak, LOTS of Omegas are very good (SMP, PO, Aqua Terra, Constellation), new TAG Link chronograph 7750, Rolex Explorer I and II, Daytonas, etc. etc.

We are spoiled.

Edited by By-Tor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breitling Navitimer, Steelfish and Avenger are very good replicas. Vacheron Constantin Overseas, AP Royal Oak, LOTS of Omegas are very good (SMP, PO, Aqua Terra, Constellation), Rolex Explorer I and II, Daytonas, etc. etc.

We are spoiled.

two questions:

the royal oak????

there is a steelfish rep?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two questions:

the royal oak????

there is a steelfish rep?

Oops, I actually meant Avenger Seawolf titanium. ;)

About the Royal Oak... where's admin when you need him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minor inaccuracies have been noted in the IWC GST. I have one, but I don't expect to be called out on it.

The Pan 192 has been called out for a few inaccuracies as well, but seeing that it was a limited edition (and Pans aren't that common to begin with), those inaccuracies seem fairly picayune and inconsequential.

I think I could hand either of those watches over to a dealer, and unless they happened to be an expert in those brands I don't think I'd be called out.

Rolexes are the most at risk from being called out, just because they are the best known and most imitated. That is one reason why I only have one, a YM, and even then I don't wear it barely as often as some of my others. Even if it had smaller or fewer flaws, it would probably be called first.

So to answer the original question about which models are most accurate and require the least mods, my answer would be that it depends-- on the circles you run in, the watch models involved, and the quality of the watch that you purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up