magagne Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Due to some avatar that is too "explicit or "subjective" consulting this site is not appropriate in a corporate environment. Probably same problem for some that have member of family at home. Please , there's a way to be less "explicit" and be more "family" friendly gentlemen ? The primary subject of this site is about WATCH, no? Thank you for your comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omega1 Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 My controls-->options-->board settings-->board display settings-->turn off avatars-->change my account options Thank you for your comprehension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magagne Posted September 11, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 (edited) A parental control !!! that's perfect Now I'll able to read you anywhere !!! Edited September 11, 2007 by magagne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ximenes Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 could we see the inappropriate avatars please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 We also have a ruling against explicit avatars so if there is any we have missed please inform an Admin team member. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 HA HA HA yes lets see them!! One member has a one new one that really catches your eye but im not gunna rat him out becasue i like it LOL Lonnie could we see the inappropriate avatars please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 One member has a one new one that really catches your eye but im not gunna rat him out becasue i like it LOL Stephane replaced his new avatar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgegrasser Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 What about that freaken naked squirell? That offends me no end. But I kept it to myself. To be against an explicit avatar is equal to announcing that one is gay. I caution against that. Breasts are nice. They are art. Just depends on the chick in the photo. She took the time to show us. We should be at least courteous enough to take a look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corgi Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 I completely agree. I think this forum should be pornography-free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkerouac Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 To be against an explicit avatar is equal to announcing that one is gay. I caution against that. Breasts are nice. They are art. Just depends on the chick in the photo. She took the time to show us. We should be at least courteous enough to take a look. The issue is being able to browse without worrying either at the workplace or when the wife/girlfriend or kids are present. Sure, you can turn avatars off, but you might end up having to switch them on and off several times a day if you only need to be concerned about inappropriate content during a portion of your surfing day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 To be against an explicit avatar is equal to announcing that one is gay. I caution against that. At a guess, you're single and at an educated guess you have no kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgegrasser Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 I was just kidding. You don't think that post was funny? I'm still chuckling and I'm the one that wrote it. Especially the squirell part! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 You don't think that post was funny? Not really, no. Your avatar, however, is funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkerouac Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 I was just kidding. You don't think that post was funny? I'm still chuckling and I'm the one that wrote it. Especially the squirell part! I confess, I chuckled at the squirrel part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris5264 Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Well,,,there are good psychological and economic reasons one shouldn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Why should you NEVER look at pornography (even in the mildest form) at the airport newsstand before your flight takes off? Because you'll miss the flight? If you're supposed to be on a plane and are reading porn instead, you're pretty silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJo35 Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 (edited) What's with the squirrel, is he humping something? Edited September 12, 2007 by JoJo35 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris5264 Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Because you'll miss the flight? If you're supposed to be on a plane and are reading porn instead, you're pretty silly. true,,,,but I was thinking of something less obvious. Actually,,,you shouldn't even think about porn....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smilingbear Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Why should you NEVER look at pornography (even in the mildest form) at the airport newsstand before your flight takes off? Because your boss or client might be in the airport and see your lewd behavior? Because you might be left too physically stimulated and embarrass yourself on a crowded plane? Because you should never look at it, it's evil like your mom told you? (more far fetched) Because all the blood will rush to your nether regions, you will have shortness of breath, and then you'll get on a plane that is only pressurized to 10K ft. Maybe you'll pass out? OK I don't know, I hope you'll share the answer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 (more far fetched) Because all the blood will rush to your nether regions, you will have shortness of breath, and then you'll get on a plane that is only pressurized to 10K ft. Maybe you'll pass out? I assumed it was something like this, but I dismissed it due to Mile High Club evidence rendering it exceedingly unlikely to be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Because if the plane crashes you're just not going to heaven bucko , also your wife/gf wont be the one you are giving your last thoughts too. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratchpot Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 I thank everyone for their comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahchard Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 nice to learn about the settings thingy... will change them when I am at work so I can browse freely... on another note... is anyone else finding the site really slow? I get this message at the top of my page: Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name resolution in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php on line 49 Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to rwg.cc:8000 (Unknown error) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php on line 49 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 624 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 625 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 626 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 630 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 632 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/action_public/BouncyBootlegsMods/BouncyRadioCenter/Ultra/radiostats_functions.php:49) in /home/rwg/public_html/members/sources/classes/class_display.php on line 633 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgegrasser Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Yes. Very slow. Seeing that there is only five new posts showing, it must be worse for others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victoria Posted September 12, 2007 Report Share Posted September 12, 2007 Yes. Very slow. Seeing that there is only five new posts showing, it must be worse for others. I'm getting the exact same sequence of error codes; the same utter slowness; and worse, all the fonts are outsized, which always happens when there is a glitch in the system. However, it's just not been my day these past 4 hours since posting the Strap Caper! My internet fried, and the IT guys said it would take a few hours to come back online. But before that, my own computer was acting up, and I actually composed the Strap Caper TWICE (I stupidly forgot to save it, because unless I'm mistaken...Admin...Ken...someone...there is no "save post for later use" function?). Ah well. Let's hope this goes through when I press Add Reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.