Guest Sql_pl Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Great watches, highly recommended. Please enjoy the pics: SS White:
yellomen Posted March 19, 2006 Report Posted March 19, 2006 Soooo beautifull Are there flaws is this modell? I can't find anything...
Dario33 Posted March 20, 2006 Report Posted March 20, 2006 Very nice! Nice pictures too - thanks for sharing!
kdo2milger Posted March 26, 2006 Report Posted March 26, 2006 notice that all the second hands are bent ever so slightly at the tip. also i would like to see the titanium version offered with a swiss eta valjoux mov't
jsph Posted March 27, 2006 Report Posted March 27, 2006 titanium... black dial... white hands... wow!
Pugwash Posted March 27, 2006 Report Posted March 27, 2006 Sql_pl said: Titanium: Was on the wishlist until yesterday ... Expect pics at the weekend.
cwai02 Posted March 27, 2006 Report Posted March 27, 2006 Ordered one from Andrew. Will post some pictures when I receive it.
thecrow Posted March 28, 2006 Report Posted March 28, 2006 That Titanium model is sooooo sweet. It's definately my next purchase. Has anyone come up with an answer about the bent second hands? Im pretty sure they are like that with the gen also, but haven't seen a good enough picture of one to verify.
Esmarc Posted March 28, 2006 Report Posted March 28, 2006 Good to know Sql_Pl, thanks for the pointer. Makes is a lot easier for some of us to "make up our minds"... LOL Esmarc
hanswurst Posted April 4, 2006 Report Posted April 4, 2006 Beautiful watches... I have one on my list for sure. Enjoy them!
Pugwash Posted April 4, 2006 Report Posted April 4, 2006 thecrow said: Has anyone come up with an answer about the bent second hands? The bent second hand puts the point closer to the marks on the dial removing paralax inaccuracy on the sub-second chrono.
dadog13 Posted April 4, 2006 Report Posted April 4, 2006 nice pics & watches... now you miss only the gen... wear them well!
sjedwardz Posted April 6, 2006 Report Posted April 6, 2006 Excellent pics!. The WHite SS is VERY high up on my wish list. Do you have the latest movement? ALso how is the time accuracy so far?
lfovco Posted May 26, 2006 Report Posted May 26, 2006 are they all Asia movt. or is there a swiss version as well?
Pugwash Posted May 26, 2006 Report Posted May 26, 2006 lfovco said: are they all Asia movt. or is there a swiss version as well? I have not seen a swiss one. The 7750@28, with the cost of a The Zigmeister service thrown in, is as reliable as an ETA, and probably still cheaper.
steve123456789 Posted June 6, 2006 Report Posted June 6, 2006 I just purchased one also. There are several Dealers selling the same watches as there is only one Manufacturer. You know it is the same one as the serial # of all end on "649". Aspire has one for $ 199 but wants you to uses Weastern Union . I got one for $ 250 including EMS shipping. NICE watch. The watch runs a bit fast and I plan on waitin a few months and then may adjust it.
Watchmeister Posted June 25, 2006 Report Posted June 25, 2006 SQL PL- Since you own all three I was curious as to whether one version was more accurate than others as relates to dial, hands and datewheel. That titanium version looks beautiful. I assume there actually was a gen in titanium. The issue with titanium is often the basic color (yes I know it darkens over time). The gens are often lighter in the flesh. Chrono Avenger is a good example. In any case those are beautifu reps - wear them well. Thanks, Kruz
faonmyea Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 (edited) Pugwash said: The bent second hand puts the point closer to the marks on the dial removing paralax inaccuracy on the sub-second chrono. just in case some of you don't know, this is when you look at the hand from different angles. so if the true second hand time was at 00 seconds, if you view it from the right it would look like 59 seconds. from the left would look like 1 second. bending reduces this error. the IWC logo on the clasp looks rough. is it just the picture or is it really like that? Edited July 10, 2006 by faonmyea
Craytonic Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 faonmyea said: just in case some of you don't know, this is when you look at the hand from different angles. so if the true second hand time was at 00 seconds, if you view it from the right it would look like 59 seconds. from the left would look like 1 second. bending reduces this error. the IWC logo on the clasp looks rough. is it just the picture or is it really like that? crisp, but not straight.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now