guesswho Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 bah, i dont really know anything about rolexs (rolii ?? ) but there is a marker on the dial just above the 3 position which looks bold when it should not be...
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 Warm, but not quite... Keep looking...
spaghettiman Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 It's not bold. The 2 o' clock marker is upside down!
swdivad Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 copper colored rings around the subdials? The lume area in the middle of the dial indices seems very thin?
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 It's not bold. The 2 o' clock marker is upside down!
guesswho Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 It's not bold. The 2 o' clock marker is upside down! haha, how did i not see that?!?! its so obvious once you know.
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 Advertised as all original by a well known and credible collector... ...for $20k US...
Pugwash Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Check out my dial, the Swiss Made is too close to the 6 and the text is slightly off.
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 Pugs... I present to you, the perfect companion to your watch...
KB Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Pugs... I present to you, the perfect companion to your watch... OMG Where did you find that? Ken
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 I don't recall where I found that pic... But I want one!
By-Tor Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 That 2'o'clock marker is definitely upside down. And shouldn't the dial have markings T Swiss - Swiss T? Just a wild guess.
HighDef Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 This Rolllie is a genuine piece, but what the h*ll happened to that 2 o'clock marker Manufacturing defect??
sashwatch Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 sub dials are close together.. but too bad, the pic too blur to see whether the sub dial has correct marking.. but definetly the 2oclock index is SOOO WRONG!
oswald Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Pugs... I present to you, the perfect companion to your watch... PENIRAI??
Guest sub4me Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 I've never seen that before, thats funny, well unless your the owner of that piece.
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 copper colored rings around the subdials? The lume area in the middle of the dial indices seems very thin? The coffee colored/faded sub dial rings are an anomaly amongst certain serials (W, T etc.). These 'imperfections' were a result of the paint/varnish having an adverse effect to the sun, causing them to darken. Most of these dials were replaced by Rolex Service as an imperfection; very few remain with their original dials unchanged (hence making them very rare). One specific example that sold in the Mondani auction went for 44,000 CHF. That 2'o'clock marker is definitely upside down. And shouldn't the dial have markings T Swiss - Swiss T? Just a wild guess. The T SWISS MADE T dial is correct (1996 production with a T serial). Rolex didn't swith to Luminova until I believe the U or A serial range. This Rolllie is a genuine piece, but what the h*ll happened to that 2 o'clock marker Manufacturing defect?? Hard to say. The seller is well known and with a good reputation; I don't think he'd go out of his way to fake a dial. And, it's not the first time something like this has happened with regards to a flaw getting past Rolex QC either...
bkatbamna Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Well, on TZ someone bought a TOG that didn't have "Turn-O-Graph" printed on the dial so it is possible that things like that get past the qc.
ubiquitous Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 Well, on TZ someone bought a TOG that didn't have "Turn-O-Graph" printed on the dial so it is possible that things like that get past the qc. Yes.... Mistakes do happen...
jimmytim Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 From what I can see, the more mistakes the better So people will always have second thoughts about our reps are indeed reps
sssurfer Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Pugs... I present to you, the perfect companion to your watch... It's obviously a rep: it declares 'CAZZOMIR' while it clearly is a Luminor model. PENIRAI, as suggested by Oswald, would have been a much better choice. And a more international one, too, 'cazzo' being an exclusively Italian word... Exceptional finding, I too want one!
MAHLER Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 (edited) Pugs... I present to you, the perfect companion to your watch... Non ci posso credere questo è un pezzo da museo !!!! This piece is very hard to find and exclusive !!! Edited July 29, 2006 by MAHLER
lovepanerai Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 (edited) Check out my dial, the Swiss Made is too close to the 6 and the text is slightly off. good one trying to set us up? , that's funny does that say Pantier? I assume you photoshoped this? Edited July 29, 2006 by lovepanerai
HighDef Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 good one trying to set us up? , that's funny does that say Pantier? I assume you photoshoped this? I believe it is "PANTIES"
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now