It still has that new watch smell. You know, that "this is a brilliant watch" feeling that every watch, even the bad ones has. I'll be more objective in a week, but I think I'm going to like it.
Welcome to the Speedy Club. Now you need to learn the secret battle-cry:
"Moonwards Ho!"
You shout that with your Moonie held aloft a clench-fisted wrist. Moonwards ho.
There are no villains so we try to make them. TTK, for instance, was controversial and entertaining. He was an excellent walking controversy, but in the end he sort of lost his way.
The forum is both better and worse off without him.
If we had a villain, the forum would spark back to vibrancy.
One of my most enduring posts was a controversial flame-fest. The forum discussion took it way further than was my intention, but the community turned it into a real positive move. Remember "Little white lies"?
Controversy has its place on forums, it's part of the vibrant life of a community.
One interview technique that has served me well in the past is to go into the interview assuming you've got it and that the entire interview process is to convince you that you want to work there. With that mindset, your confidence shows through and the interview will, after the formalities, pretty much turn to them trying to sell the job to you.
Good luck, and I hope they succeed in selling you the job.
No argument from me on this one.
Oh, this is hopefully the next Gen I buy, if I can find one at a decent enough price:
If someone walked up to me and said they could sell me one of those for under
Good answer.
I have several answers for historical watches, but for a modern, off-the-shelf gen, it'd probably be some cheap Seiko.
If I had to get a from-the-shop quartz cheapo, it'd be a crappy Timex like this: