GMT 1675 -
don't kill me the tiny crown - the feeling - don't know - 2 weeks and it was gone
(and is now 1000s of Euros more expensive grrrrr )
on Reps :
PO 45mm, Skyland, Fiddy - i tried hard - but they are just too big and heavy ...
IWC GST : too small and light
GMT Master "Retro" - the most horrible Rep i owned - too many flaws.
cheers,
Frank
looks like the same awful construction like on mine -
what you need now is a CLARKS crystal + the ret. ring -
remove the old glass : use the force Luke
and remove the old little plastic ring inside the bezel.
then use the Clark parts and bingo
cheers,
Frank
i get your point
my opinion is that the WM9 Sub is not better than other Replica Subs form Asia -
only more expensive.
reading the crap on the WM9 website (Rolex trained watchmaker mister bla bla bla ...)
or this ridicules story about the making of a new Yachtmaster just reminds me on other scammer sides
that sell a++ grade Swiss replicas.
don't get me wrong : i like the "WM9" Subs - but im lucky that other dealer sell them also
cheers,
Frank
got mine - took some time to compare it with WM9
- absolutely the same source .... + the engravings (they are better than on the Euromariner but still not good enough - so they have to go )
btw. never read so much bulls*hit like on the WM9 website
cheers,
Frank
my Exp.:
SSD (i had 3 pieces)
gen crown : yes
gen insert : on 1 of 3 without mods
gen dial : yes
gen bezel : no
gen crystal : no
Noob GMT II (had 3)
gen crown : on 2 of 3
gen dial : yes
gen insert : no (has to be modified)
gen bezel : no
gen crystal : no
Euromariner :
gen crown : yes
gen dial : yes
gen insert : yes
gen bezel : ?
gen crystal : yes
Tudor Viet Case :
gen insert : yes
gen dial : yes
gen hands : yes
Noobmariner :
gen crown : no
gen dial : yes
gen insert : no (mods possible)
gen bezel : no
gen crystal : no
cheers,
Frank
i love DJs ! maybe im getting older but they
becomming my fav Rollies
esp. the Ref 16XX is extremly nice - i love the silver DWs and the plexi
cheers,
Frank